MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 30761
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#801 Post by Jamiet99uk » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:09 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:04 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:01 pm
See, @Xorxes, @Bozozo, @Tom?

We have two people, at least, who explicitly will not claim their PR / NonPR status until Xorxes verifies his role.

Xorxes is now actively preventing a full massclaim.
That is exactly the kind of thing you would want get out of a reaction test.

We already have 9 PR claims, we should just lynch those refusing to claim, regardless of their reason.
I'm just as happy to lynch the person who chose to claim the only GM-verifiable role, and who is refusing to have the GM verify him. It's very anti-town.

BunnyGo
Posts: 14498
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#802 Post by BunnyGo » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:09 pm

Tom Bombadil wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:05 pm
##vote BunnyGo
Why?

bozotheclown
Posts: 12913
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#803 Post by bozotheclown » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:10 pm

Tom Bombadil wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:05 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:05 pm
Tom Bombadil wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 5:36 pm
##vote goldfinger
Why?
I am voting people who are not claiming
We should consolidate on one non-claimer.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 30761
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#804 Post by Jamiet99uk » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:10 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:09 pm
Tom Bombadil wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:05 pm
##vote BunnyGo
Why?
He is voting people who will not claim.

Tom Bombadil
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 2927
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2017 1:52 pm
Location: Detroit, MI
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#805 Post by Tom Bombadil » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:10 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:09 pm
Tom Bombadil wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:05 pm
##vote BunnyGo
Why?
Because you haven't claimed

ND
Posts: 3187
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:49 pm
Location: America
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#806 Post by ND » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:11 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:09 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:04 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:01 pm
See, @Xorxes, @Bozozo, @Tom?

We have two people, at least, who explicitly will not claim their PR / NonPR status until Xorxes verifies his role.

Xorxes is now actively preventing a full massclaim.
That is exactly the kind of thing you would want get out of a reaction test.

We already have 9 PR claims, we should just lynch those refusing to claim, regardless of their reason.
I'm just as happy to lynch the person who chose to claim the only GM-verifiable role, and who is refusing to have the GM verify him. It's very anti-town.
exactly

Tom Bombadil
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 2927
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2017 1:52 pm
Location: Detroit, MI
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#807 Post by Tom Bombadil » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:12 pm

ND wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:11 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:09 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:04 pm


That is exactly the kind of thing you would want get out of a reaction test.

We already have 9 PR claims, we should just lynch those refusing to claim, regardless of their reason.
I'm just as happy to lynch the person who chose to claim the only GM-verifiable role, and who is refusing to have the GM verify him. It's very anti-town.
exactly
There is a clear reason xorx is not claming. And it is not anti-town.

Tom Bombadil
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 2927
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2017 1:52 pm
Location: Detroit, MI
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#808 Post by Tom Bombadil » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:12 pm

Tom Bombadil wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:12 pm
ND wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:11 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:09 pm


I'm just as happy to lynch the person who chose to claim the only GM-verifiable role, and who is refusing to have the GM verify him. It's very anti-town.
exactly
There is a clear reason xorx is not claming. And it is not anti-town.
Clear reason xorx is not *confirming*

BunnyGo
Posts: 14498
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#809 Post by BunnyGo » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:13 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:09 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:02 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 5:09 pm


Five players have reacted in an anti-town way by voting for an uncced PR instead of someone likely to be scum.
If he’d claimed any other role then this would be an “unCCd claim” but his claim is designed to be mechanically confirmable. tiānxiǎode why he hasn’t cleared this up yet. The longer it drags, the more I think this is all a trap.
It is still uncced because if he was not the Captain, there would be a real Captain out there who could claim. On the off chance that xorxes is not the Captain, he is already caught, so why is it necessary to force the reveal today? Also, why should it affect anyone's willingness to claim?
BECAUSE CLAIMING IS ANTI-TOWN IN THIS SETUP YOU liú kǒushuǐ de biǎozǐ hé hóuzǐ de bèn érzǐ。We as a group never agreed it wasn’t. Hell by the time the claiming started we were barely past joke phase and a half dozen players hasn’t posted more than “hello”.

You can take your gǒushǐ policy vote, Tom, and put it back where it came from.

BunnyGo
Posts: 14498
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#810 Post by BunnyGo » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:13 pm

Tom Bombadil wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:12 pm
ND wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:11 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:09 pm


I'm just as happy to lynch the person who chose to claim the only GM-verifiable role, and who is refusing to have the GM verify him. It's very anti-town.
exactly
There is a clear reason xorx is not claming. And it is not anti-town.
Oh? He doesn’t want extra votes today? He doesn’t want several of us to claim?

Tom Bombadil
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 2927
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2017 1:52 pm
Location: Detroit, MI
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#811 Post by Tom Bombadil » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:15 pm

"BECAUSE CLAIMING IS ANTI-TOWN IN THIS SETUP YOU "

incorrect. It forces scum to commit to lies and creates town clears. Nothing about it anti-town and Im glad xorx is forcing everyone to do it.

bozotheclown
Posts: 12913
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#812 Post by bozotheclown » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:16 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:13 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:09 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:02 pm


If he’d claimed any other role then this would be an “unCCd claim” but his claim is designed to be mechanically confirmable. tiānxiǎode why he hasn’t cleared this up yet. The longer it drags, the more I think this is all a trap.
It is still uncced because if he was not the Captain, there would be a real Captain out there who could claim. On the off chance that xorxes is not the Captain, he is already caught, so why is it necessary to force the reveal today? Also, why should it affect anyone's willingness to claim?
BECAUSE CLAIMING IS ANTI-TOWN IN THIS SETUP YOU liú kǒushuǐ de biǎozǐ hé hóuzǐ de bèn érzǐ。We as a group never agreed it wasn’t. Hell by the time the claiming started we were barely past joke phase and a half dozen players hasn’t posted more than “hello”.

You can take your gǒushǐ policy vote, Tom, and put it back where it came from.
Can you explain to me why claiming is anti-town in this setup? I see little down side to getting 10 town clears when there are only 15 town.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#813 Post by xorxes » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:16 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:13 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:09 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:02 pm


If he’d claimed any other role then this would be an “unCCd claim” but his claim is designed to be mechanically confirmable. tiānxiǎode why he hasn’t cleared this up yet. The longer it drags, the more I think this is all a trap.
It is still uncced because if he was not the Captain, there would be a real Captain out there who could claim. On the off chance that xorxes is not the Captain, he is already caught, so why is it necessary to force the reveal today? Also, why should it affect anyone's willingness to claim?
BECAUSE CLAIMING IS ANTI-TOWN IN THIS SETUP YOU liú kǒushuǐ de biǎozǐ hé hóuzǐ de bèn érzǐ。We as a group never agreed it wasn’t. Hell by the time the claiming started we were barely past joke phase and a half dozen players hasn’t posted more than “hello”.

You can take your gǒushǐ policy vote, Tom, and put it back where it came from.
If you think claiming is anti-town, why are you saying that you will claim if I reveal? Why would my reveal cause you to act in an anti-town manner?

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 30761
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#814 Post by Jamiet99uk » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:17 pm

Tom Bombadil wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:12 pm
There is a clear reason xorx is not confirming. And it is not anti-town.
And just what is that?

Educate us, O Mighty and Learned Tombo.

BunnyGo
Posts: 14498
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#815 Post by BunnyGo » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:18 pm

xorxes wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:16 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:13 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:09 pm


It is still uncced because if he was not the Captain, there would be a real Captain out there who could claim. On the off chance that xorxes is not the Captain, he is already caught, so why is it necessary to force the reveal today? Also, why should it affect anyone's willingness to claim?
BECAUSE CLAIMING IS ANTI-TOWN IN THIS SETUP YOU liú kǒushuǐ de biǎozǐ hé hóuzǐ de bèn érzǐ。We as a group never agreed it wasn’t. Hell by the time the claiming started we were barely past joke phase and a half dozen players hasn’t posted more than “hello”.

You can take your gǒushǐ policy vote, Tom, and put it back where it came from.
If you think claiming is anti-town, why are you saying that you will claim if I reveal? Why would my reveal cause you to act in an anti-town manner?
Because we are past the point of no return. Not claiming at all was not anti-town. Not participating is also anti-town. But the reaver is really a deterrent to claiming. A strong one that I don’t think people appreciated enough.

goldfinger0303
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 1669
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:17 pm
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#816 Post by goldfinger0303 » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:19 pm

Also, I did mention yesterday that I would give xorxes some more time to do his reaction hunting. But we're approaching End of Day now, and I think everyone would benefit immensely from having his role confirmed.

Also, there's this
xorxes wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 12:22 am
worcej wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 12:09 am
xorxes wrote:
Tue Dec 31, 2019 11:33 pm


My reveal has zero relevance to the claims. People who make it contingent on that are looking for excuses.
Likewise, what is the danger in you revealing your claim now? You can prove it and alleviate any possible concerns, yet choose not to?
No danger. I just think forcing people to read me instead of bludgeoning them with a GM reveal is much more informative.
You admit there's no danger to getting GM verification. You have your reads on people. Its time to claim. How would you feel about a different town PR who voluntarily chose not to use their powers? A claimed Doc who didn't save anyone? A claimed cop who didn't scan anyone? You're in the same boat. I want your extra votes today, where it counts.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#817 Post by xorxes » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:20 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:13 pm
Tom Bombadil wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:12 pm
ND wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:11 pm


exactly
There is a clear reason xorx is not claming. And it is not anti-town.
Oh? He doesn’t want extra votes today? He doesn’t want several of us to claim?
I don't want the extra votes.
I don't want to be a mechanical clear yet.
I want the freedom to use the reveal to prove I have not been recruited (this was not one of my original reasons, but the way the roleblock works it might actually be useful to have this way of proving I was not recruited available).


BunnyGo
Posts: 14498
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#819 Post by BunnyGo » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:21 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:18 pm
xorxes wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:16 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:13 pm


BECAUSE CLAIMING IS ANTI-TOWN IN THIS SETUP YOU liú kǒushuǐ de biǎozǐ hé hóuzǐ de bèn érzǐ。We as a group never agreed it wasn’t. Hell by the time the claiming started we were barely past joke phase and a half dozen players hasn’t posted more than “hello”.

You can take your gǒushǐ policy vote, Tom, and put it back where it came from.
If you think claiming is anti-town, why are you saying that you will claim if I reveal? Why would my reveal cause you to act in an anti-town manner?
Because we are past the point of no return. Not claiming at all was not anti-town. Not participating is also anti-town. But the reaver is really a deterrent to claiming. A strong one that I don’t think people appreciated enough.
I’m on my phone so hard to say much. It to summarize the following are all anti-town actions;

1) mass claiming (because of reaver this does help against alliance)
2) starting mass claim by ones self
3) not clearing PRs that are clearable
4) not participating in a mass claim once it’s going (then the alliance doesn’t get caught even if we’re helping reavers...might as well get something)

BunnyGo
Posts: 14498
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#820 Post by BunnyGo » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:24 pm

xorxes wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:20 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:13 pm
Tom Bombadil wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:12 pm


There is a clear reason xorx is not claming. And it is not anti-town.
Oh? He doesn’t want extra votes today? He doesn’t want several of us to claim?
I don't want the extra votes.
I don't want to be a mechanical clear yet.
I want the freedom to use the reveal to prove I have not been recruited (this was not one of my original reasons, but the way the roleblock works it might actually be useful to have this way of proving I was not recruited available).
If alliance roleblocked you then all the other more useful PRs are clear to work. And if it messes us up deciding if you’re a reaver, oh well. I’m sure there are several ways to be pretty sure you aren’t turned in the first few nights. Reveal.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, foodcoats, Vecna