I would kill Benjamin Netanyahu, and I would publicly declare exactly why: he is a despot, carrying out an actual act of genocide in Gaza.

Guess:

Arturo Ambrosio

TheMadMonarch wrote: ↑

Sat May 25, 2024 11:06 am

This looks very fun. I am just not sure that I have enough free time to engage with it. It took me 3 days to even read the thread after BB and darg asked me to play

Well, yes, but....

Brainbomb is a GM and not a player, so that will reduce the number of pages each day.

CALL QM,

You missed two:

Hominidae wrote: ↑

Fri May 24, 2024 9:32 pm

Primarily famous for something related to politics or arts?

CALL QM,

You missed one:

DreamTrawler wrote: ↑

Fri May 24, 2024 9:25 pm

Born in Europe?

Either: An odd, but not divisible by three, number of the conditions below apply? OR A number of the conditions below apply that is divisible by four? White Royalty (but not Nobility) Famous for being a general/other Military leader Born 1850 or later Born 1900 or later Died before the age of 29 No...

All this is pretty much certain. Add variables like a Trump victory, a revived Tory opposition led by the exciting young Badenoch, grim news from Ukraine, and whatever the next unexpected global disaster will be, and Kier may well be wishing he never got the job. But you never know... He may get lu...

When does the game start?

DiplomacyandWarfare wrote: ↑

Fri May 24, 2024 1:08 am

Let's play Dragonchess!
1. d4

2. Ankara Crescent.

MajorMitchell, you seem rather over-stimulated.

Perhaps you should go and have a little sit down and a nice cool glass of milk.

A question on the Tadpole:

I assume that if a Town player receives the Tadpole and is deciding whether to accept or destroy it, they are allowed to ignore the usual rule about playing to their win condition while they are making that choice. Right?

damo666 wrote: ↑

Thu May 23, 2024 2:22 pm

I hope this Rune stuff won't occur in actual game thread.

I demand that the GM post flavour posts exclusively in Elder Futhark.

1. ᚲᚺᚨᚲᚨ 2. ᚲᛁᛜᛟᚠᚦᛖᛈᛁᚱᚨᛏᛖᛊ 3. ᛃᚢᛊᛏᚨᚷᚢᛁᚾᚨᛗᛖᛞᚹᛁᛚᛚ 4. ᛃᚨᛗᛁᛖᛏ99ᚢᚲ 5. ᛒᛟᚾᚨ 6. ᛞᚨᛗᛟ666 7. ᚺᚨᛗᛁᛚᛏᛟᚾ ᛒᚱᛟᚨᚾ 8. ᛞᛟᚢᛊᛁᛜ 9. ᚠᛟᛟᛞᚲᛟᚨᛏᛊ 10. ᛒᚢᚾᚾᛁᚷᛟ 11. ᚷᚺᚢᚷ 12. ᛖᛉᛟ 13. ᚠᛚᚨᚢᛁᚢᛊᚨᛖᛏᛁᚢᛊ 14. ᛞᛁᛈᛚᛟᛗᚨᚲᛁᚨᚾᛞᚹᚨᚱᚠᚨᚱᛖ 15. ᚲᚨᚲᚨᚱᚱᛟᛏᛟ 16. ᚹᛟᚱᚲᛖᛃ 17. ᛚᚠᛁᛊᚲᚺᛚ 18. ᚢᛖᚲᚾᚨ 19. ᚠᛟᚲᛊᚲᚨᛊᛏᛚᛖ 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. ᛊᚢᛒᛊ

ᚺᛖ ᚹᚨᛊ ᚨᚾ ᛟᛚᛞ ᛗᚨᚾ ᚹᚺᛟ ᚠᛁᛊᚺᛖᛞ ᚨᛚᛟᚾᛖ ᛁᚾ ᚨ ᛊᚲᛁᚠᚠ ᛁᚾ ᚦᛖ ᚷᚢᛚᚠ ᛊᛏᚱᛖᛗ ᚨᚾᛞ ᚺᛖ ᚺᚨᛞ ᚷᛟᚾᛖ ᛖᛁᚷᚺᛏᛁ-ᚠᛟᚢᚱ ᛞᚨᛁᛊ ᚾᛟᚹ ᚹᛁᚦᛟᚢᛏ ᛏᚨᚲᛁᛜ ᚨ ᚠᛁᛊᚺ. ᛁᚾ ᚦᛖ ᚠᛁᚱᛊᛏ ᚠᛟᚱᛏᛁ ᛞᚨᛁᛊ ᚨ ᛒᛟᛁ ᚺᚨᛞ ᛒᛖᛖᚾ ᚹᛁᚦ ᚺᛁᛗ. ᛒᚢᛏ ᚨᚠᛏᛖᚱ ᚠᛟᚱᛏᛁ ᛞᚨᛁᛊ ᚹᛁᚦᛟᚢᛏ ᚨ ᚠᛁᛊᚺ ᚦᛖ ᛒᛟᛁ×ᛊ ᛈᚨᚱᛖᚾᛏᛊ ᚺᚨᛞ ᛏᛟᛚᛞ ᚺᛁᛗ ᚦᚨᛏ ᚦᛖ ᛟᛚᛞ ᛗᚨᚾ ᚹᚨᛊ ᚾᛟᚹ ᛞᛖᚠᛁᚾᛁᛏᛖᛚᛁ ᚨᚾᛞ ᚠᛁᚾᚨᛚᛚᛁ ᛊᚨᛚᚨᛟ, ᚹᚺᛁᚲᚺ ᛁᛊ ᚦᛖ ᚹᛟ...

if a gm wants to run a game where they hand pick roles and there is no RNG that should absolutely be allowed if its part of the games theme. like an all stars game or something unique. Or a role madness or a upick. I think if you force a must always be 100% RNG rule you eliminate tons of game conce...

Iatrophobe: May not be protected from nightkills, may not be saved, attacks on latrophobe may not be redirected. Tadpole recruitment will fail automatically. ##Call GM This appears to be an extremely negative-utility role. Is that intentional or am I missing some advantage provided by this ultra-we...

Player List:
1. chaqa
2. kingofthepirates
3. JustAGuyNamedWill
4. Jamiet99uk
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.

Subs:

Iatrophobe: May not be protected from nightkills, may not be saved, attacks on latrophobe may not be redirected. Tadpole recruitment will fail automatically. ##Call GM This appears to be an extremely negative-utility role. Is that intentional or am I missing some advantage provided by this ultra-we...

Hominidae wrote: ↑

Tue May 21, 2024 2:15 am

DiplomacyandWarfare wrote: ↑

Tue May 21, 2024 1:49 am

Is there a Wikipedia page (under the domain wikipedia.org, in English) about this person?

Yes, but I would avoid asking this question in the future because the answer is almost always guaranteed to be "yes".

Mostly, but not always (see game 117).

What are the rules about this anyways? It seems like there is a consensus that GMs handpicking players for roles is bad, and randomization is good. "Rerolling" randomized roles is sometimes acceptable. Is there a rule or Kouncil decision that GMs cannot handpick players for roles? I've seen (and re...