If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below. You may also attach files by dragging and dropping them in the message box.
by captainmeme » Thu Jun 13, 2019 1:43 pm
by captainmeme » Thu Jun 13, 2019 1:40 pm
CptMike wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2019 5:58 am The final results are here: For FvA showdown For GvI showdown
by captainmeme » Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:58 pm
by captainmeme » Wed Jun 12, 2019 11:55 am
jmo1121109 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2019 3:03 am I don't suppose anyone has a master list of all the games in these tournaments available? Or a common naming convention that would differ from previous versions of this tournament? edit captainmeme does and is adding this tournament to the finished tournaments page with the new tournament tools. You can see the last 10 rounds there already as well as the winners.
by CptMike » Wed Jun 12, 2019 5:58 am
by jmo1121109 » Wed Jun 12, 2019 3:03 am
by MadMarx » Wed Jun 12, 2019 2:32 am
by CptMike » Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:50 am
RoganJosh wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 6:56 am I think it would be more fair to compare what year the game ended, than the number of centers at the end of the game. Either way, it doesn't really fix the problem, as ties are still possible.
by RoganJosh » Tue Jun 11, 2019 6:56 am
RoganJosh wrote: ↑Wed Jun 20, 2018 11:41 pm I stumbled across this topic on github: https://github.com/kestasjk/webDiplomacy/issues/326 Is this "fully deterministic" algorithm used also for the FvA and IvG variants? That might be a problem for tournament tiebreakers, which usually are supposed to be random. I tried to look through the old forum thread but couldn't see any relevant comments.
by MadMarx » Tue Jun 11, 2019 5:59 am
CptMike wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 1:14 am I don't think it is easily feasible
by CptMike » Tue Jun 11, 2019 1:14 am
MadMarx wrote: ↑Mon Jun 10, 2019 6:44 pm Would we see a German play to 1920 in an attempt to literally eliminate Italy, to insure the German’s performance as Italy would be better? How much would play be stifled by not wanting to risk a 1920 elimination?
by goldfinger0303 » Tue Jun 11, 2019 1:09 am
by MadMarx » Mon Jun 10, 2019 6:44 pm
by breaca » Mon Jun 10, 2019 6:23 pm
CptMike wrote: ↑Mon Jun 10, 2019 5:25 pm 1v1 - new rule proposal in case of tie Most players are conviced that : - in FvA : A is a little bit stronger than F - in GvI : G is quite stronger than I. That's an issue because in case of tie, the player who get A (resp. G) is advantaged. I suggest the following new principle in case of tie. --- In case of each side wins a game, the winner is the player with the highest number of centers controlled by the country he has lost with. --- - That's fully equilibrated. - Another advantage is that tournaments will run faster... - An option could be that the centers of both countries played are combined but that may make the games longer. The winner's interest is to go as fast as possible. What is your mind ?
by CptMike » Mon Jun 10, 2019 5:25 pm
by jmo1121109 » Sun Jun 09, 2019 10:12 pm
by goldfinger0303 » Sun Jun 09, 2019 10:04 pm
by SpaceDip » Sun Jun 09, 2019 9:46 pm
by jmo1121109 » Sun Jun 09, 2019 9:42 pm
by zultar » Sun Jun 09, 2019 9:39 pm
Top