Finished: 07 PM Mon 28 Sep 15 UTC
Private Fair is foul and foul is fair . . .
1 day /phase
Pot: 200 D - Autumn, 2001, Finished
Modern Diplomacy II, Anonymous players, Survivors-Win Scoring
1 excused missed turn
Game won by Dragu (388D)

< Return

Chat archive

1
...
Country:


01 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1994: What happens if france misses a 2nd turn and is booted? Do his pieces stay and just not move?
01 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1994: I think so. The FB group is deciding whether to cancel or play on.
01 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1994: Why not just vote here?
01 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1994: Turkey says play on.
01 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1994: As do i
01 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1994: we're really not far enough in for me to be fully invested, so I could go either way.
01 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1994: I defer to five nations. Poland, Ukraine, Russia, Turkey, and Egypt, because those five nations don't benefit from the French not showing up.
02 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1994: I am on the fence as well. If he gets booted I'd lean toward scribing this match.
02 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1994: I wont be benefiting much at all from france quitting. If anything, my immediate neighbors will now be bigger than me. I just hate the idea of quitting every time something doesn't go the way we want it to. I've already put in quite a good amount of time/effort in this and would hate to see it all be for nothing.
14 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1997: Let it be known that Italy just violated our NAP. He is a stabber.
14 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1997: How petty. Some people are just bad losers.
14 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1997: Let it also be known that Germany violated ours exactly one turn before that.
14 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1997: So if we want to talk about stabbers...
14 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1997: Haha, great point. Also, i had no NAP with Germany AND i told him outright i would be attacking him.
14 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1997: Check the log, Poland - our NAP had expired.
14 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1997: ~Wed 2 Sep Autumn, 1994: Sounds good. NAP expires at the beginning of 1998.
~Wed 2 Sep Autumn, 1994: Agreed. I assume SAX, PRU, and SIL remain DMZs?
14 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1997: that log?
14 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1997: Yes, the one you violated first in 1997 (check the Order log below) when you failed in your attempt to move CZE to SAX. ;)
14 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1997: Germany to Italy: "Autumn, 1996: Yes. However, I am willing to extend it another three years (end of 2000), should you be similarly inclined.

Italy to Germany: ~Wed 09 AM Autumn, 1996: I am as I have no desire to fight you"
14 Sep 15 UTC Autumn, 1997: Then this exchange:

Germany to Italy: "let's return to my point: if you attack me prior to the Build phase of 2000, you will be a stabber. As I said - scroll up a bit - I am not attacking YOU.

You did agree to the NAP. The "but" only questioned why I would do it, not that you were not agreeing. So, if you attack me before 2000, you are a stabber and NOT a man of your word."

1
...