@ Draugnar, why don't we ban all the things that could stop you from being identified? Tinted car windows, for example. I'm for that.
And before any of you say that it'd be restricted your "freedoms", guess what? You can't do whatever you feel like anyway. You may have freedom of speech, but you can't verbally threaten someone. You may have freedoms, but they are limited. Some people (such as myself) believe that we've started favouring the rights of the individual more than the rights of the group. And that's what this debate comes down to. Do you believe in the right of an individual to cover their face if they want, or do you believe that everyone else has a right to security? I'm not saying that "security" has not been used to take away fundimental rights in the past (that would be naive), but I don't think that just because something has been used poorly in the past we should never use it (that would rule out great things like democracy, money, or trials).
I believe that democratic governments are not out to be dictatorships, but to serve their own interests. The great thing about democracy is that the current leader's main interest to remain in power and the only way to do that is to please the majority more than the other guys (or girls). I have read 1984 (and enjoyed it), but a situation like that is far far off and unattainable, but many of you seem to fear being controlled so much that your fear is starting to control you and your opinions