50 jobs. Your headline is about a company locating 50 jobs in Tulsa.
The Bay Area creates twice that EVERY DAY, on average.
Well, when Oklahoma turns into an enlightened blue beast and triples its investment in education and in twenty years has a decent base of educated people in their twenties and thirties, I'm sure it will be very impressive. In the meantime, you keep reelecting James Inhofe. I've been hearing how the south and the west were going to wake up and become the "New South" for about thirty five years now. And it's kind of sort of halfway happened. We're not in the 1950s when Oklahoma's poverty rate was 40%, it's true, but it's difficult ot imagine how far you have to go to catch up and how much of California's cash its going to take to get there.
Oh, and your article is pretty interesting, because it shows how wrong you actually are. In fact, it talks about how the poverty rate is 14% if you base it on Fresno rents, but misses the fact taht most of the people with poverty level incomes in fact live in Fresno. The reason Bay Area rents are high is because most people have high incomes. The official poverty rate in San Mateo County. take a look at where the people with low absolute incomes live: In Fresno and Tulare counties:
http://calbudgetcenter.org/blog/a-county-by-county-look-at-poverty-in-california/
In other words, the "adjustment" needs to be done on a county by county basis for it to make any sense. Because if you live in the Bay Area, rents are higher, by pay is a lot higher too.