All unclear's interactions with Espi, up to pg17 (if I die, somebody please finish this)
DL:
“This game's format is very similar to Mafia 11. That means we can town-clear me, ND, Yoyo, Guak, Espi, and Meme as we were all town in that game.” -pg1
“@Espi - last game is far different from this game in that there's no mafia roleblocker and only one power role.” -pg1
“Was Espi this buddy-y last game?” -pg1
“BTW Espi, what changed your mind regarding cop fakeclaims from M11?” -pg3
“Espi, pg3: “(to Wjessop and ND) I am really reading you both as Town right now and don't want to approach this as a 1 person vs everyone sort of thing.”
A weird thing is that you immediately correct yourself (“As a note about my above post, I have no intentions to stop looking into your actions to see if either of you is actually scum, but I think working together is in our best interests. Neither do I think that either of you should ever fully town read me, from your perspective, just as from mine, we can not tell who anyone is aside from our self”) which feels scummy to me.
“Ahh now I see it. That REST statement was just a phrase, although if you wish for me to try and assign deeper meaning to I, I could try? I honestly have no idea, I probably got in the habit of saying it during live games, or I could be wrong again so I will stick with the no idea.” -Espi, pg3
This is just awkward. On pg4 Espi also sort of mischaracterizes Ghug’s accusation as “ I used a word that you wouldn't have used. That is what happened.” -pg11
Yoyo:
“-Espi's hyperactivity” -pg5
“@Espi
I don't know. I didn't pick up any substantial scum tells from him when we were scum together, he seems the same as every game. I'll do have a few rules of thumb that I'll be looking out for.” -pg7
“ND, Yoyo, and Espi, are the main point of discussion now, none of which are particularly scummy.” -pg9
“Buddy Espi is buddy.
@@VOTE Espi” -pg10
Maniac:
“@@VOTE ESPI Obvious scum is scum. I only wish that Ghug hadn't highlighted everyone to what I consider to be a scumslip so early. (The use of the word 'rest'). Highlighting it means that his scum mates will surely bus him, which makes analysising the D1 vote hard.” -pg5
“I think on the evidence presented so far, town should be looking to lynch espi and as I've already stated mafia would probably be looking to bus him. Whilst that makes analysis of d1 difficult, I'd take that any day if our prize is lynching scum. “ -pg6
“Espi - I'm not sure if you have a bizarre writing style or you're scum. Comments like "I am also a bit worried your bus statement might have scared mafia away from voting for me, but I could be wrong." - Why would townie be scared that some comments are scaring mafia away from voting for them? I just don't get it. If you are scum, I'm not concerned that you only have three votes so far - it's still early.” -pg8
“@Bo - our votes aren't useless if we unanimously lynch Espi, but it does make the votes harder to analyse. As I've already stated, if Espi is scum, I'd take lynching him and not gaining too much info about others.” -pg16
“I think both Bo and Espi are scum and they are trying to find another target to divert lynch away from Espi. It is straight out of the mafia playbook that when attacked, try to find another candidate and it is too easy for scum to go for the ‘let’s lynch a LURKER’ play. If I’m right about Espi and Bo’s preoccupation with LURKERS, then it soft clears our traditional lurkers, CaptJeff and Guak as I don’t think mafia Espi and mafia Bo would play the ‘let’s lynch a LURKER’ card if CaptJeff or guak are the third scum.” -pg16
Guak:
“From initial read I agree that Espi is scummy as hell. Interesting scumslip for sure. Wonder what Espi has to say for himself?” -pg5
“@Espi: how exactly do you intend to find two mafia on D1? Have you ever played this game before? I know I have played games where you were playing, but did you even notice what was going on around you? *votes Espi” -pg9
Bo:
“@Espi … why do you seem so convinced that you can find all three scum on day 1? FYI, you can't. No one can.” -pg5
“@Maniac ... If you would bus Espi as mafia, then what would you do as town? Your vote rests on him, so are you saying that, regardless of his flip, your vote is meaningless?” -pg6
“I don't feel that Espi is a good D1 target (though he will be a great lynch target on D2) because, if he's scum, we'll be able to get a lot more out of him in time than we have. We should go for a lurker who won't give us that treasure trove of intel.” -pg11
“"Town questioning people is normal, hell I have been questioning things that didn't seem right for a while, but people voting for Scum just off of that is not normal. You are too confidant wjessop, waaay too confidant and I don't know if it is an act or real."
Can you explain how town is supposed to vote in your mind? Can you also explain where you think wjessop is too confident?
"My response is that I am playing poorly damnit."
This seems as forced as anything else you have said.
"I saw ND scum read a lot of town before for making mistakes, so I am more willing to believe that the slips ND is catching are slips of genuine town, being one of his reads also makes me more likely to town reason the people he scum reads, I will be keeping a close eye on everyone, but that is my gut reaction."
That doesn't answer my question. There are 9 townies and 3 mafia. Mathematically speaking, isn't it more likely than not that townies will target townies? You don't have to be confident in his reads, but to assume that everyone who ND calls out for slipping is actually town is ludicrous. If someone slipped and someone else called them out, would they still be scummy or would they be town then too?
If you're reading both Yoyo and wj as scum, what do you think the motivation is for them to get into such a heated back-and-forth like they did, and why would Yoyo in particular get so angry and frustrated, as you have, knowing he was being interrogated by his partner as opposed to someone that was simply onto him?
I will vote for whoever out of the 7 that I listed, including Vecna, Maniac, and yourself, is a) the most scummy at the end of the day, and b) whose lynch is unlikely to provide us substantially more information if we put it off until later. Lurkers tend to fall into that latter category, whereas more active scum that are under a lot of pressure will often provide a truckload of information if their death is put off for a short while. In my proposition, I said that we should go after those who we believe are active scum, as I do you, on day 2, but not day 1. It's an extra 72 hours of interrogation, more than doubling what we would have if we lynched an active scum player today.
“ -pg11
“why do you trust ghug, myself, and maybe Yoyo? I recall this same discussion coming up in another game, was it M11? You shouldn't blindly trust anyone, especially halfway through D1. If you trust us, explain why.” -pg11
“You're dancing on hypocrisy; you have been all game.” -pg12
Vecna:
“Also did I just potentially save Espi by starting a new thing?” -pg6
“ND OR Espi - I'm quite certain one of these two is scum by the way they've been trying to profile themselves. The hiding in plain sight tactic at work while trying to focus attention on another person. ND has been doing this a lot more than Espi, but he actually raised some decent reads. Will be interesting to see if he's right if Espi does get lynched (which would mean ND townie for life in my book)” -pg8
“Espi sure does seem like a good candidate but its all based on ND just posting a full list of Espi's weird comments together and applying a ton of pressure together with the band wagon. I said earlier I liked his reads but reading them again im not so convinced anymore. Especially now that he also launches a similair case against Wjessop. He posts a lot of stuff, and applies some "analysis" but the conclusions just dont seem to have much merit to me.” -pg16