@Krellin
I will admit, as I have before that he does not always follow the law exactly, and sometimes not fairly either. Note that following the law exactly and following it fairly are often inconsistent with each other, and very hard. I can't think of any executive body that manages it well. Good, that's out of the way.
You make a valid point, to a certain extent in your second paragraph. I agree that there is equal protection from the law for citizens. Of course, we are dealing with corporations here, which are tricky. They pay taxes and have income, but are not citizens. If they become citizens, sure. I don't think they should be able to. As citizens they would gain a vote, and the vote would be in the control of someone who already has a vote. We have a specific code of laws for citizens, corporations, and their interactions. I think, as the ACA is currently law, and as there is no reason for corporations to have payment delayed, they should start paying for it with everyone else.
Now, one thing I don't understand, that I would like explained. What is the basis for opposition to universal federal health care? Perhaps if I understand your position, our argument will start to actually help us.