@Invictus: I'm trying to learn something, sort of playing devil's advocate. I don't mind you thinking I'm a moron, just note that I'm working on it, wether true or not.
@Putin33: If your point is merely that they have strong(er) ties to Africa/slave trade, sure. But that's origin (I don't want to get to the technical part of that word, you know what I mean).
The problem with that to me is that by directly associating colour to race, people start, for example, bleaching their skins, to change their race. I think talking about race rather than colour is in fact discrimination, not as much in the offensive way, but more in the sneaky way making it normal, provoking people to hide their 'race'. It's indeed a social construction, meaning we can change it (well, in this context). It has to be accepted as just a social construction though, not an actual, definable difference. What I'm talking about is that if you want to judge race by colour, what are you going to call (native) Africans who are more white than me? Black? Can you imagine not everyone would agree to calling white people black? Could you imagine that people who don't want to be associated with the black 'race' become white just because we call the 'race' 'black'?
I know I'm rambling a bit here but I'm sure it serves the purpose.
Krellin: When I posted the thread I was trolling, but I got more serious with every post. It's the kind of format I found to work best here. If you start out serious, you'll meet the trolls...
There has been little trolling here.