Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 791 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Diplomat33 (243 D(B))
14 Sep 11 UTC
Help!
I need one point in order to host another game. Will anyone give it to me and will the mods help? if you do give it to me ill invite you into the game if you wish. Just one point? Anyone?
13 replies
Open
Genktarov (103 D)
13 Sep 11 UTC
Points
So, theoretically, what would happen if you lost all your points?
6 replies
Open
King Atom (100 D)
14 Sep 11 UTC
Troll Thread
Here we post comments to other threads of people who have muted us.
1 reply
Open
Fasces349 (0 DX)
14 Sep 11 UTC
Utopia
Thomas Moore's book (which I am about to start reading) represents what is in his view, a Utopian society. Given this book was written almost 500 years ago, there is no doubt that Moore's ideas are outdated and maybe in some case perceived as unethical in our society.

Sp, my question for all would be, say you were the author of Utopia, what would be the setting of your book?
6 replies
Open
KalelChase (1494 D(G))
14 Sep 11 UTC
Not bragging - game of chaos, but fun ending
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=66655

2 replies
Open
Tettleton's Chew (0 DX)
08 Sep 11 UTC
9-11 Truthers demolised in Slate Article
If you are one of those total nutjobs that is so far out of touch with any molecule of reality that you are a 9-11 truther then I would recommend you not clicking on the link I provide because the article totally demolishes your fantasies.
68 replies
Open
diplomancer83 (123 D)
13 Sep 11 UTC
I just want to say...
this is the best place for reasonable and balanced political debate. Thank you.
5 replies
Open
Diplomat33 (243 D(B))
13 Sep 11 UTC
How to make and keep alliances
I am wondering what people feel are the best ways to make and keep alliances. Seeing as they are almost necessary to win, i want to know some experienced players' advice and tips on them.
21 replies
Open
King Atom (100 D)
11 Sep 11 UTC
Iceland...
Iceland is not in its proper position on the WebDiplomacy map (meaning that it is not that close to England in actuality), so why would it even be included on the map if it serves no other purpose. WHY IS IT THERE?
44 replies
Open
Yonni (136 D(S))
13 Sep 11 UTC
A game for everyone who just cancelled that last game (and anyone else who wants to join)
So, hear is the replacement game. Starts soon so join up.
gameID=67740
8 replies
Open
Lando Calrissian (100 D(S))
13 Sep 11 UTC
36 hour goonbat
Join up http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=67806
5 replies
Open
Scmoo472 (1933 D)
13 Sep 11 UTC
Game Overview. Simply State Input Please
gameID=67781
I was Italy, I failed on when the game started, and went to dinner, and came in in 1903. Can you tell me how I did. (I would like to start to try and improve my game to increase my Win %)
Thanks.
11 replies
Open
Crazyter (1335 D(G))
12 Sep 11 UTC
Taking a break
I want to thank everyone for a wonderful fun-filled experience on this site. When my last 2 games end, I'll be taking a break.
24 replies
Open
Diplomat33 (243 D(B))
12 Sep 11 UTC
Annoying Player Help
A friend of mine playing web diplomacy told me he had a player called King Atom in his game, but feels the player is very annoying and wants help dealing with the problem. Is there any way to kick a player out of a game or block them from joining a public game for future reference.
60 replies
Open
Mickie (394 D)
12 Sep 11 UTC
Games paused?
I may have missed the thread on this, but is there any way for a mod to now unpause the games that have been put on pause since the glitch has happened at least 24 hours ago? In world games where there are a fair few who have already CDed, it would be great to get moving!
5 replies
Open
Mickie (394 D)
12 Sep 11 UTC
Muting
Sorry to post twice at once, but I keep hearing of this "muting" function but I have no idea what it is - can someone explain? ;)
4 replies
Open
insane (173 D)
13 Sep 11 UTC
livegame
join http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=67800
3 replies
Open
FirstApple (100 D(B))
12 Sep 11 UTC
Trading points
Is it possible at all for one player to give another player points in order to get into a game or is that just completely impossible?
14 replies
Open
Fasces349 (0 DX)
11 Sep 11 UTC
9/11
Happy 9/11 everyone. Let us celebrate the day Al Qaeda smashed the Yankees.
92 replies
Open
abgemacht (1076 D(G))
12 Sep 11 UTC
I swear I run a shelter for battered kittens IRL
A lot of people who are asshats online use the excuse that IRL they are real good people. Why is this considered a valid excuse? Is it because of the perceived anonymity of the web, like road rage? If you wouldn't call someone a faggot IRL, why would you do it here?
39 replies
Open
abgemacht (1076 D(G))
12 Sep 11 UTC
Sins of a Solar Empire
This could be the best RTS I've ever played. It's like a wonderful mix of Ascendancy, EVE, Homeworld, and Supreme Commander. Still need to play some more to see if it's my number one, but it looks promising. Anyone else play this?
54 replies
Open
ulytau (541 D)
13 Sep 11 UTC
Guessing game
So I got home from one social event, few beers were unlucky enough to meet my stomach and so on. Then I got hungry and fried me 7 late-night eggs. The problem was I forgot I wasn't supposed to feed the whole family as usually but only myself, yet I used the same amount of oil and butter. The eggs literally swam in grease. Of course I ate them, I'm a pig/scrooge, but what will my intestines say? To find out whether there is any consensus on this complicated subject, I propose a guessing game.
13 replies
Open
centurion1 (1478 D)
13 Sep 11 UTC
everything wrong with internet diplomacy
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=67788

cd's and then not stopping games after them.
5 replies
Open
lionhearted (503 D)
12 Sep 11 UTC
How common is soloing without backstabbing?
I've been in the endgame a few times with a strong position, but I hate the idea of turning on someone I've been working with since turn 1. It just... it's a terrible bad vibe, y'know? You have a good time playing together for a couple hours, coordinating, etc, I don't want to stab after that.

Other players might make poor tactical moves or fight at bad times, but how common is solo-winning based on that? Are people who try to not stab their allies consigned to lots of draws?
33 replies
Open
Agent K (0 DX)
13 Sep 11 UTC
Linear Algebra Basics
Taking Cross-Section Econometrics but have never taken a Linear algebra course. Trying to make sure i understand the basics.
13 replies
Open
Marti the Bruce (100 D)
12 Sep 11 UTC
First Solo
Just wanted everybody to know i have just won my first game here. I'm happy and was actually thinking of doing an AAR, but perhaps that is going just a tad too far? I don't know, is that the done thing? You tell me.
Oh, game ID#66745.
Was a close run thing for a little while, bugger England hit me hard, but luckily didn't land the knock-out punch. He's licking his wounds now.
8 replies
Open
King Atom (100 D)
13 Sep 11 UTC
Hilarious!
Took me until the end to realize what it was...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODc8PeQ66MU
6 replies
Open
micahbales (1397 D)
12 Sep 11 UTC
WebDiplo Rankings
Can someone please explain how ranking works on WebDiplomacy? Is it based on points? Wins vs losses? I'm interested in understanding both the numerical rankings as well as the "political puppet," etc. rankings. Thanks in advance!
7 replies
Open
Diplomat33 (243 D(B))
13 Sep 11 UTC
low points game, need players
interested in playing a low risk game that costs only 5 D to join. its called Low Stake 7 and the password is password. please join and play the game without worry of loosing points.
2 replies
Open
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
03 Sep 11 UTC
Am I Alone In Defying this?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/why-men-dont-fancy-funny-women-525001.html

If I EVER were to fall for a woman, it'd HAVE to be the smartest, wittiest, most unique gal I could find...even if she had a beard or third eye.
Just curious, since we have a lot of married me--careful what you say!--and bachelors...am I the only one who'd put brain-size over...?
Page 2 of 5
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
Tom Bombadil (4023 D(G))
04 Sep 11 UTC
+1 zultar.

This thread is so full of win.

@Yellowjacket: I'm on my way! I don't know where you are so I'm just going to wander around and ask every person I see if they are Yellowjacket. I'm that desperate!!!
Tom Bombadil (4023 D(G))
04 Sep 11 UTC
Just to be clear, that +1 was for the KA comment, not the in-laws comment
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
@obi, I also think you are wrong. I just spent most of the night talking to an incredibly witty, smart, and unique "gal". We are best friends and get each other great, but there is no physical spark for either of us, so that is all we are, best friends.

@supersteve, ROFL
WardenDresden (239 D(B))
04 Sep 11 UTC
Well, I'll be the first to admit, I have yet to find any girls that have the spark of real attraction with me, but I've been on enough dates to know what I don't like.
Of course, I'm also an amateur fiction critic/writer, and I've always been very picky so....
Forever Alone.
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
"there is no physical spark for either of us, so that is all we are, best friends."

That's "all" you are?

As if there's more?

My friends have mainly been English, Poly-Sci, and Theatre people...so, naturally, THEY, through the years, have shacked up many times, and broken up many times...and MOST of those times I called, could tell from the start how it was going to end, and that's just it:

They ALWAYS end.

But MY best friend and I have had knock-down, drag-out fights, bickered for a sport, spent three months not talking to one another thanks to the fallout from our biggest fight ever...but she's had three boyfriends in the time I've known her...

I've out-lasted #1 and #2, and #3's no problem, either.



To me, there is NOTHING higher-up in connecting with someone than a Holmes-Watson, Kirk-Spock-McCoy, Kate-Petruccio sort of a bond.

"Dating" is either a best friend with benefits, or the means to an end that--let's be honest--you don't need a friend for so much as an open wallet, if that particular end is that pleasing.

Best Friends are the pinnacle...physical attraction's just a nice, gaudy attraction.

The deepest connection is when I talk to my best friend, pose her with a personal question, and we each know what the other will say, and respond in kind knowing which buttons we each can push on the other to try and win the argument, and to go all out there, pour our heart and soul into that, expose mentally and emotionally what could only be shown superficially physically, shout, get angry, even come to blows...

And be able to laugh it off as a typical meeting and grab a drink together.

Best Friends are...the best.

All gay jokes aside--at the end of the day, it's not a woman--not even Irene Adler--Holmes needs at his side, but Watson.

They're connected in a way no physical connection can ever approach.

THAT, if anything, is as close to an intrinsic "meaning" to life as anything else...everyone having their own Watson, or Spock, or Kate, or whomever.
zephyris (1316 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
I'm curious, to all you guys, if you would ever date a girl who happened to be transgender/transsexual. And if you had already been dating, and they tell you a bit later, would you stop seeing her? Even if they were like the girl you are attracted to, but they just happened to be born with the wrong parts.

I don't mean to troll or whatever the word is.. If anything, I may be provoking my own emotions based on responses.
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
I don't date and never have, so maybe I'm not someone who should respond to that...

But no--if she was the one who connected with my mind and whatever emotions this cold bastard might have...

I could care less if she had three dicks and a claw down there, to be honest--

She'd still be the One.
Yellowjacket (835 D(B))
04 Sep 11 UTC
LOL I can respond to Zultar's comment and Zephyris question at the same time.

KA wouldn't dare to displease me, he lives to slavishly serve my desires. Unfortunately, the only desire I have for overly emotional teenage boys is watching them discover new and inventive methods of self-murder.
Yellowjacket (835 D(B))
04 Sep 11 UTC
oh, and Obiwan there are people in this world who are comfortable with the asexual lifestyle, so it's worth exploring, but most people find the bond is expressed most powerfully while plunging organs into orifices.

I don't know what it is, they just do.
I've never dated a girl twice if I couldn't hold an intelligent conversation with her. I always thought I was in a minority in that, until now...

Oh, and it's Sunday morning here, not Saturday night. ;-)
SuperSteve+100.
Yellowjacket (835 D(B))
04 Sep 11 UTC
I don't think anybody here (well, not most) denies that intelligence is important. I just think that for most people to get everything a relationship has to offer you need attraction to accompany it. Attraction without compatibility is a shallow thing. Compatibility without attraction is just friendship.
Putin33 (111 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
I thought "dating" died with the internet and non-stop eating out. You people actually "date"? What counts as a date these days?

Glad I'm married and don't have to deal with this bs anymore. I can stay in on Saturday night and not get ridiculed by oversexed drunken single people. Namely because I don't have any single friends anymore.
King Atom (100 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
This is all just ridiculous. Women don't need a brain, they just need to be good cooks....

But I completely agree obi, any woman who is not smarter than me is not worth my time. Granted that she's also very attractive and a good cook.....
Also, Putin, how is that true? Us church people have this wonderfully boring thing called 'courting' where eventually everyone loses interest except the two in love and then whatever they've been doing becomes a date.

And what's this with me and Yellowjackoff? I'd rather not get into another conversation about homosexuality....or into (I think a brand new topic...) pediophilia.
Putin33 (111 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
I know you church people. You get married at age 19 because you're forced to remain chaste until marriage but you can't even wait that long http://chattahbox.com/us/2009/09/18/states-with-most-born-again-christians-have-highest-teen-pregnancy-rates/

You hold these teen church camps or ministry camps where everybody impregnates someone or gets pregnant and then gets married a year later.
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
Oh God...something wicked this way comes (namely, a God-Church fight with Putin and KA involved...)
Putin33 (111 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
I don't see how best friendships can work if one best friend is in a relationship. At that point you're #2 for her and she's #1 for you. In all likelihood her boyfriend serves most of the functions you serve, unless it's purely physical between them. Even if you're lucky that she has an understanding boyfriend who doesn't mind another male companion around all the time, you end up being 3rd wheel way too often. If you find yourself doing too many favors for her while she can never be counted on then it's time to exit the friendship.

Since you can't "love" more than one person, a 3-way with one platonic friendship is not a recipe for long term success, imo. Some exclusivity is needed.
Yellowjacket (835 D(B))
04 Sep 11 UTC
Yeah, religion correlates with LOTS of desirable attributes... desirable if you're trying to spread a virus :P

http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/religion_vs_iq.html
mapleleaf (0 DX)
04 Sep 11 UTC
obi-rainman posted,...."am I the only one who'd put brain-size over...?"
#################################################################
But of course you are, you pompous (not)fucking cunt. The rest of us are mindless cattle. You are SUPERMAN, you ball-less wonder.
#################################################################
"I'm as asexual a creature as you can get, so physical attractiveness.."
#################################################################
You, more than likely, have a mild strain of Autism. This, in and of itself, is not a bad thing. Your mock-incomprehension of why you are different from others is getting more than a little tiresome, however.
#################################################################
"As usual, I think Shakespeare has a handle on this"
#################################################################
So do I. He married at the age of 18, and his first child was born SIX MONTHS LATER(Please. One of you patient people explain to obi-eunuch what the significance of this is). By most accounts he fathered three children, and was something of a hound dog.

In other words he was kind of normal, unlike you.
#################################################################
""there is no physical spark for either of us, so that is all we are, best friends."

That's "all" you are?

As if there's more?"
#################################################################
I pity you.

You seem to think that you lead some sort of evolved existence.

You're over-compensating.

These cerebral relationships, which you admire, are NOT mutually exclusive from physical relationships. They are part of a whole.

Your brain is MISSING a part, and you KNOW it.

Frankly, it's nothing more than sour grapes.
#################################################################
"They ALWAYS end" "
#################################################################
Simplistic, and just plain wrong.
#################################################################
"Best Friends are the pinnacle...physical attraction's just a nice, gaudy attraction...Best Friends are...the best...All gay jokes aside--at the end of the day, it's not a woman--not even Irene Adler--Holmes needs at his side, but Watson...
They're connected in a way no physical connection can ever approach"
#################################################################
How ON EARTH could you know, you sad freak?

mapleleaf (0 DX)
04 Sep 11 UTC
Sorry for this double post.

obi......the fact that you need to lean on characters from a STORY to support your simplistic views on physical attraction is telling.

Grow up.
Yakoska (496 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
Really interesting thread. Maple, that could have been an excellent post (In my opinion) if you'd left off the name calling.

"All we are is best friends" is the knife edge here. Few people ever really get to have a best friend in the truest sense of the word. It does demean the experience to say "All we are". That said, "An open wallet" gets you sex, not love or romance. And is as well, a telling statement.

Shakespeare's Sonnet basically says "I want you, even if you aren't poetry personified." And that doesn't mean physical attractiveness isn't important. It means, I'm still physically attracted to you anyway.

Most partners don't have to be Tens, they have to be attractive enough. They don't have to be geniuses, they have to be smart enough. They don't have to drink dos equis (be the most interesting person in the world) they just have to be interesting enough. Same for funny, same for anything. There is something magical feeling about when you meet someone who is all that to you. It fills you up with hope, promise and glory. It makes even true friendship pale by comparison. There is simply no other feeling on earth like it. We call it love, but then we use that word for a lot less as well.

Then, there is the feeling you get when THEY feel that about you. And you realize that the feelings you had about them... were insignificant.

Is there something even greater? I haven't felt it yet. But I hope so. Probably having kids, now that I've had a moment to think about it. Yikes, scary thought.

That doesn't mean having a true friendship is Nothing. Its not. Its amazing. Few people get that chance. But its not the acme.

What you are guilty of, Obi, in my opinion, is being afraid of the possibilities. But don't worry, you're certainly not alone there.
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
mapleleaf +1 You spared me the trouble of trying to explain to obi why his responses are so sad/depressing.
zephyris (1316 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
Well, everything else aside, I think what Obi wrote in response to my post is a great way to think. It's even kind of romantic, almost in a tsundere kind of way, maybe..

Anyway, thank you Obi, for replying to my question.
fiedler (1293 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
jmo1121109 you are so sad/depressing.
SacredDigits (102 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
Sorry I couldn't respond on Saturday night, I was at a sex party.

I find that I need a minimal level of physical attractiveness, but the mind is what I'm really interested in. I mean, I won't go for ugly chicks, but average looking women who are smart and funny are alright by me. As for the question about MTF trans...I think I'd have to seriously think about it if it ever became an issue. I want to look enlightened and say it wouldn't matter, but when push comes to shove(ing something in an orifice) I think it might. I dated an amputee until we had sex, and I was all "It doesn't matter" until I got that up close look.
King Atom (100 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?

@Putin: I know full well that Christians can make mistakes. That's why I wear pants. And that whole 'best friend' thing...I have no idea what you or obi are trying to say. Perhaps someone could clarify what each of your posts mean.

@Yellowjacket: What the fuck? You do realize that there are only 39 D on that scatter-plot and about half of them are under an IQ of 85 which is borderline retardation. So if this plot isn't pure cherry-picking...I don't know what is. Also, you can't ask a person about their religous values, because that could range from cults to Catholicism. And any Christian who doesn't list "Religion" as 100% important, obviously has no real pastoral education. And if you've ever heard of Pascal, you'll know that a complete Atheist could sat religion is a 100. That argument is completely flawed.
King Atom (100 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
*39 D...this can really get annoying sometimes.
Mafialligator (239 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
"But I completely agree obi, any woman who is not smarter than me is not worth my time." - The category "Women smarter than KA" doesn't really narrow things down much does it?

I have to say, everyone says things like this, "Oh I don't care about attractiveness, all that matters is intelligence." but then, I mean, it's not as though this article is proven wrong, because a bunch of anonymous people over the internet claim that they don't really care about looks in dating. It's not as though anyone else on the diplomacy forums is in a position to contradict you.

Also this kinda came up in a conversation I was having with a friend the other day. We were kinda discussing our unusually attractive extended social circle, and we noticed that while a lot of the women in said circle really are very very attractive, most of the guys are only average, but seem so much better looking because they're charming, intelligent and charismatic. It's an interesting double standard I think.
Mafialligator (239 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
(Yes my friend and I were being shallow and petty, so sue us.)
zephyris (1316 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
@SacredDigits: Thanks for your reply. So it sounds like you wouldn't completely dismiss dating her, until sex becomes relevant? What if she already had genital surgery?
King Atom (100 D)
04 Sep 11 UTC
"Granted that she's also very attractive"
Yes, I can confirm that Mafialligator is an idiot. And if you have anything to say about my intelligence, you obviously have never met me...obviously!
I don't understand why I, a superior being, recieve the most ridicule...NEW THREAD POSTING!

Page 2 of 5
FirstPreviousNextLast
 

135 replies
Page 791 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top