We are not evolving toward any specific target. The standard 'natural selection' merely re-enforces evolution toward survival (to child rearing age) and this influence affects us on a social as well as genetic level - we are 'evolving' on a social level as well - without genes passing on information it is easier to change the info faster - but too much mutation tends to result in ideas failing and becoming tainted with their failure (like certain economic systems)

It is not biological evolution, but we are mutating on a genetic level, affected by viruses which add themselves to our dna, many social pressures which alter of gen pool... not toward anything - because we have mosstly made survival very easy y altering our enviroment - but increasing our own genetic diversity (which is better than is happening in the genes of show dogs - breeding programmes which have encouraged specific traits to be encouraged beyond the point where they are healthy for the animals...

but it is still going through the mechanisms of evolution - we may soon be able to predict the effects of a genetic illness waay before birth and thus abort potentially unhealthy foetuses. We are currently able to show partners whether they have dissimilar HLA genes (which have a large effect in the immune system - HLA dissimilar couples tend to have better sex lives, cheat less often and produce offspring with more robust immune systems - that said Women have been show to be able to pick HLA dissimilar men based on smell - so that effect is probably already effecting choice of partner)