Obi's List:
10. Marne I/II (Arguably the most intense and important battles of WWI)
9. Stalingrad (The “Battle of Britain” on the Eastern Front…arguably Russia’s Finest Hour)
8. Waterloo (Napoleon’s, England’s glory-era proceeds full-swing, France has never recaptured the magic)
7. Trenton (Washington Crosses the Delaware, Saves the Revolution, will allow America to continue on)
6. Zama (A Waterloo for Hannibal, Carthage falls, and Rome’s subsequent dominance impacts the West immensely)
5. Marathon (The Greeks repelling the Persian invasion “saved” Western/Greek civilization in its infancy)
4. Tours (A French loss, and the Arabic/Muslim influence spread over Europe, changing cultural/political history)
3. Cortez vs. Aztecs (The Beginning of the End for a great empire, the rise of another…and the Worlds collide)
2. Normandy (The largest landing invasion of all-time, and one of the biggest in terms of size and stakes)
1. Battle of Britain (An English loss, and we may have well had a VERY different Europe…and world)
5 Honorable Mentions:
-Trafalgar
-Israeli War for Independence/Agression (depending on who you side with there…you know which side I back)
-Thermopylae
-Iwo Jima
-Hastings
And 5 Notes on the Ratings:
-BoB wins out for me just because I’m not so sure the Allies would have won WWII if that battle had been lost…even if the USA entered and fought with the USSR and whatever was left of England and France, Hitler may have had enough time, resources, and momentum to sue for peace, or even win out.
-Normandy and Stalingrad are lower as I don’t think either of them could’ve been war-losers by themselves, whereas it’s hard not to see an English loss in the BoB as a war-loser…Normandy was an offensive, so a loss there would’ve hurt severely, but not destroyed the Allied effort…and while Stalingrad is maybe the grittiest, nastiest battle on the list, I don’t think Hitler could have won on two fronts anyway, and so I think the USSR would’ve prevailed/outlasted Hitler with the West pushing even if Stalingrad fell…maybe I’m wrong, but hey, so much of this is based on “what-ifs” and opinion.
-I included both Marne battles as they occurred on the same site, were equally important, and bookend WWI nicely
-The lasting historical ramifications of each battle played a large part in deciding their place; as a result, older battles for independence such as Marathon and Tours were placed over Marne I/II, Waterloo, and so on…those battles arguably never happen if Marathon and/or Tours are lost.
-Finally, the reverse-outcome-potential (ie, if the other side won) played the biggest factor for me…hence Trenton’s being included and being ranked over Waterloo—a Napoleon win at Waterloo still gives him a long road ahead and England may well have won, but a Washington loss at Trenton and the Revolution likely dies in 1776’s Valley Forge cold, and no USA impacts the next two centuries immensely) and the BoB winning the top slot—I still hold if that goes the other way and Hitler wins, Europe might be different, what is now the “free” world might be under imperial, totalitarian regimes, and some of us—ahem—might not be sitting here typing this list out.