ricky used to ask lucy to 'splain things all of the time

Lucy! You got some splain' to do ...
https://www.pinterest.com/whimsicaldreams/lucy-you-got-some-splain-to-do/

Thank you for mansplaining this stuff for me guys

Mansplaining typically involve unasked for or unneeded explanations. Like when a man at a party find out the woman he is talking to works in some biology field (can't remember the details of this story), and then tells her all about this new theory which he read about in a book... She says things like 'yeah, i know, i wrote a book about it' but he insists that she has to read this newly publishes theory and explains at length.

When you're talking to the author of the book you're trying to explain, and you don't realise they know more about the subject than you. That is mansplaining.

And it typically happens when a man assumes he is superior and talks over women as a matter of normal conversation. Research seems to indicate that talking over, at least, is very common, and men tend to assume they are experts, or project some confidence which women tend to hide even when they are experts.

Look at twitter, there are endless examples in the hashtag #mansplaining

brainbomb lies about seeking advice.

orathaic is right.

And the Urban Dictionary is just plain ugly. Really sad to see.

I had no idea biologists have parties

I like orange juice.

Apple Juice is better, #teamapple

I created Orange Juice

A better term would be manfusing, if not for the unfortunate homoerotic double entendre

See also: manspreading and manterupting.

Mansplaining is a rhetorical device that uses feminists' sexist opinions about men to stifle criticism so that the user of the device doesn't have to resolve the criticism of the argument or position being presented. I would advise you to ignore anyone who accuses you of it, because there is always a way to present that exact criticism to you without trying to weaponize your sex against you, which means that person does not have both of your interests at heart.

Someone has probably been accused of mansplaining...

i want to manually manipulate in a manner that manufactures a mandatory mandate manifested in a manner creating a manifesto in which the manslaugher of mannequins utilizing mangos in mangroves while drinking mangria with mangrille seed and eating mandrill monkeyheads in mangrit with mandy in manhattan after a manhunt through manchester. oh man!

Okay so can anyone explain to me what manwiching is?

It's when you insert a bomb between the two hemispheres in your brain.

Basicllay the " new youger generation " attach a lable to anything that has been a part of the humna condition for milenia . then say its a newly discovered thing.

The paraphrase smarter folk than any of us " There is nothing new under the sun"

and " the youth today are rude, drunards, stupid,lazy and the world will fall into choas when they inherit it " - Socrates i think.

manwich isn't that something that campbell soup sells?

@Smokey, i think labeling thinks is very useful, so even if men have been mansplaining for hundreds of years (ie assuming they knew better and talked over women/ignored their expertise), now that feminists have invented a word for it, they can use that word to very explain the problematic behaviour - and hopefully correct it.

Makes you wonder about "manipulate"
Dare I ask anyone to explain the term "Femtruthspeak" ?

Mansplaining is when a man talks to an impressionable woman. If you’re a such a woman, you can hear other woman speak in the same tones and use the same jargon in speaking down to you and that’s that. When it’s a man, and you’re silly, it is mansplaining.

When a woman speaks down to a man in the same way, which happens just as often, it’s just what it is.

Feminist bend the rules to fit their narrative and their best trick is to hide completely mundane actions that everyone of every gender and sex makes behind sexual exclusions at the expense of men.

In fact, feminism is talking down and treating down to men. It really is nothing but codified sexism against masculinity and for people that want to believe nothing but narrative.

All the sexists are coming out of the closet.

Yes, you’re sexist if you disagree with feminist dogma. Great logic.

If you’re a woman and you disagree with feminism it’s internalised patriarchy or misogyny. No one is allowed their own opinions. By all means, call everyone that disagrees or calls bullshit a sexist. That is your blind spot.

shigzeo: Don't kid yourself. You're not disagreeing with feminism, but rather only a straw man (pardon the pun).

Please explain my straw man that would also not explain mansplaining in the same terms? I should add that this entire thread is speaking down. I’d anyone here identifies as a woman, technically they could cry mansplaining.

It is a joke term.

What about man-ipulating?

Look at these femsplainers.