"Girlfriend and you go to the bar, come back to the room, watching a movie, she starts snuggling up to you and kissing your neck, so in the heat of the moment you squeeze a boob without asking for permission and suddenly your conservative christian girlfriend - who ONLY wanted to kiss - has just made you a sex offender."
A murky case, since though going strictly by the rules set in the email SHE would have sexually assaulted HIM first with her snuggling and kissing I doubt they would ever be interpreted that way.
"And yes, if you have a conservative christian girlfriend who has expressed that she isn't interested in sex, and you violate her wishes, you've probably done something wrong. "
Her not giving consent and expressing she is not interested in sex are two different things. One is inaction, the other is action.
"It's all fucking context, and you have to be an idiot to be guilty of something. Don't you people get to know women before you try and spread their legs open? If you go around having sex indiscriminately, this kind of shit happens."
That's the problem, there's nothing about context in the email. Legs don't need to be parted for sexual contact to happen, and two people knowing each other does not mean one of them cannot sexually assault the other.
)
Keep putting webdiplomacy on the map
)
)
)
)