A good (but modest) start, at least.

You're applauding this act of civil disobedience for the undocumented? I'm completely confused.

No, I'm applauding the arrest of high-level government parasites.

I should have figured. Libertarians siding with the police, as usual.

I'm applauding the civil disobedience

It's better than the police killing people indiscriminately like they did in the old Soviet Union.

"Libertarians siding with the police, as usual."

This is the first time I can remember siding with the police (if you want to call it that) in years.

He was being sarcastic...

Putin33 thinks libertarians want to re-criminalize sodomy, so he's got a pretty flawed understanding of the group to begin with.

Libertarian support for brute force by the police is a longstanding tradition.

http://articles.latimes.com/1991-03-10/opinion/op-178_1_safe-streets

Invictus understands precisely nothing about nothing. I doubt Tolstoy would concede that the Fortune Teller from Illinois's milquetoast variant of libertarianism is authentic.

"Invictus understands precisely nothing about nothing."

Why does every debate with you boil down to a line like this?

Lew Rockwell sucks lel

"Why does every debate with you boil down to a line like this?"

You're joking and don't read your own posts.

Way to prove my point.

You lose your shit over discussions about the Mariners, spare me.

This is all you need to know about your supreme ruler, bro:

http://images.smh.com.au/2013/06/07/4471056/putin169.jpg

So we can assume your lame whining about tonality is just empty posturing from a frequently belligerent name-caller, right?

I'm glad people approve of Botox's spamming of other threads with irrelevant nonsense.

That picture actually makes me like Putin more tbh

IJS

Putin has eight of the last 20 posts in this thread and complains about someone else spamming. No one can make a fool look more foolish than the fool himself.

"Libertarian support for brute force by the police is a longstanding tradition. "

Meh. Rockwell and Rothbard both had their right-wing phase in the early nineties, but it didn't last long, and very certainly and obviously does not represent Rockwell's views today. Even if it did, this brief period in the lives of two Libertarian figures certainly doesn't describe or define the movement as a whole any more than Perestroika defined Soviet Communism.

"It's better than the police killing people indiscriminately like they did in the old Soviet Union." – Emac

I had to laugh when I read that sentence. :-) What an entirely irrelevant comment that entirely ignore the issue at stake.
'You murdered my father in cold blood!' – bo_sox48
'Oh yeah? Hitler killed millions in cold blood!' – Emac

And his irrelevant comment is not even accurate. Pre-Stalin, Soviet citizens had more to worry about than the 'police'. Post-Stalin, the police didn't 'kill people indiscriminately'.

ignored

JECE, the communist Soviet Union killed 20 million of its own citizens in peacetime. This is from the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS). Please enlighten the board with your source of the 20 million killed by the Czars in a 70 year period. There is no explaining why a dumb ass like you would laugh at the facts, but hey who knows why a dumb ass like you does anything.

ignored.

That's how you do it right JECE? Post something and then one minute later claim you've been ignored. Are all the in-denial-proponents-of-communism like you on this board incapable of not make fools of themselves?

"What an entirely irrelevant comment that entirely ignore the issue at stake." was not a grammatically correct sentence, spam-happy fool.

And what you have said neither explains how your quoted comment was in any way relevant to the arrests on the Mall nor provide even remote evidence for the comment.

I appreciate that you abandoned your "it's not even accurate" bullshit. You do have some common sense after all. You forgot to post "ignored" a minute after you posted this time though.