MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
RagingIke297
Posts: 2282
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:35 pm
Location: Locked in Bo_Sox's Basement
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#801 Post by RagingIke297 » Sun Mar 03, 2019 7:55 am

Squigs44 wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 7:47 am
Hey Ike, can you actually play the game now? You've posted a couple things on Vapor being scum, but your argument is weak and your vote looks forced. Can you either give a more succinct and solid case on Vapor or do some solid scumhunting elsewhere? This Durga thing is a distraction, so ignore it for the time being.
I've got a call GM in, I'm headed to bed now and I assume it'll be answered when I wake up. Might talk more then depending on what happens

Squigs44
Developer
Developer
Posts: 4342
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#802 Post by Squigs44 » Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:01 am

thamrick wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 4:47 am
Vapor/Attorney interaction early on (~p. 13-15) seems very unlikely to be scum/scum to me.

I don't like Percy's vote for Vapor at the top of 16 (For ref). It looks like a joke vote, but it's at a period where people actually were scumreading Vapor and he was the center of the recent discussion. Seems like a vote to keep momentum going, but in a format that would allow him to absolve himself later, claiming it was just a joke.

damo seems like he's just commenting to comment. Taking things out of context and not really making implications from his comments.
This post also makes comments without implications. Can you follow through with your comments and give us conclusions, or ask questions to players to further development your read?

Nephthys
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:47 am
Location: Not a GM
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#803 Post by Nephthys » Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:10 am

Also just FYI, I wont be on at EOD, probs for the last 4-5 hours cause of work will check tomorrow morning and read as much as I can

Squigs44
Developer
Developer
Posts: 4342
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#804 Post by Squigs44 » Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:10 am

e.m.c^42 wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 2:56 am
both vecna and neph have tried to give thoughts based on nonmech, but I have a feeling that people are waiting for vecna catching up tomorrow lol (before establishing more of an opinion)
since a good amount happened after he left.

Neph/Vapor/Xorxes so far seem okay, they've each made somewhat individual points and poked them. the latter two have been significantly different from the only reference I have, last game, which is making me feel like it's a good thing so far. Neph is Neph, don't think it's been long enough for him to shine.

Attorney seems to be fulfilling the secondary lulz role, which is causing some people to dislike him a bit? (haven't referenced, so margin of error is large)

Haven't really seen anything too serious yet, but at least he's semiactive. Going to wait and see if he actually tries to produce anything.

Squigs I seem to only recall math...and more math xD (is he usually a maths guy?)
and mech, but more recently he's commented reads, just spread out among posts. And @Squigs to reply why brain is in noncon, I'm just going to move him whenever is changes lol--all I did was digitize something I already had on paper to help me try to follow along.
The stream of consciousness here is good, but it would be more helpful if you drew stronger conclusions emc. Emc is my top townread behind Xorxes rn.

Also, I'm a math major, so yes, I math a lot.

Squigs44
Developer
Developer
Posts: 4342
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#805 Post by Squigs44 » Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:13 am

Nephthys wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 7:55 am
Squigs44 wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 7:51 am
Nephthys wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 7:47 am


I like this and want to bring it back as I don't think it has been answered

@Attorney please answer.
What do you like about this? The logic procession thing? What does logic procession even mean here?
I feel as though this is a weird post to bring up...

I want attorney to post his logic so far in this game because, as brain pointed out, most of this game rests on him at the moment.
So you want him to explain his thought process for each of his posts in the game? Well, maybe not that in-depth, but for each of his reads?

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#806 Post by bozotheclown » Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:20 am

Nephthys wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 7:32 am
brainbomb wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 7:26 am
##Vote Ezio
Thoughts on my post against Ezio?
It made me suspect that you were bussing Ezio.

Squigs44
Developer
Developer
Posts: 4342
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#807 Post by Squigs44 » Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:21 am

damo666 wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 1:29 am
brainbomb wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 1:17 am
Kevin Brennan MP (Labour Backbencher)

is my real flavour
Is this true or did you just pick one at random with the 95% chance Jamie hadn't included in game?
How is this question useful in any way?

Nephthys
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:47 am
Location: Not a GM
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#808 Post by Nephthys » Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:24 am

bozotheclown wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:20 am
Nephthys wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 7:32 am
brainbomb wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 7:26 am
##Vote Ezio
Thoughts on my post against Ezio?
It made me suspect that you were bussing Ezio.
In none of the previous games have you ever raised this, seems a little weird for you to pull it out especially when I've been right both times before.

Seems a little weird to suddenly change tack, unless there's something else you wanna add?

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#809 Post by bozotheclown » Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:27 am

Nephthys wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:24 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:20 am
Nephthys wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 7:32 am


Thoughts on my post against Ezio?
It made me suspect that you were bussing Ezio.
In none of the previous games have you ever raised this, seems a little weird for you to pull it out especially when I've been right both times before.

Seems a little weird to suddenly change tack, unless there's something else you wanna add?
I do not know what you are referring to in previous games, but it just seemed like you were setting yourself up to be "correct" with a scum read of Ezio.

Nephthys
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:47 am
Location: Not a GM
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#810 Post by Nephthys » Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:30 am

bozotheclown wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:27 am
Nephthys wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:24 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:20 am


It made me suspect that you were bussing Ezio.
In none of the previous games have you ever raised this, seems a little weird for you to pull it out especially when I've been right both times before.

Seems a little weird to suddenly change tack, unless there's something else you wanna add?
I do not know what you are referring to in previous games, but it just seemed like you were setting yourself up to be "correct" with a scum read of Ezio.
The previous games just gave me confidence to make this slightly more obvious that I have previously.

Should you wish to check in;
M41 I got darg D1
Last game I got Vapor D1
Both scenarios no one was really reading them.

Here I just made mine slightly more obvious. That being said I don't think he is the right lynch here, probably D2/3

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#811 Post by bozotheclown » Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:31 am

thamrick wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 4:31 am
Checking in to say that I admittedly haven’t read the setup close enough to comment on the benefit of xorxes’ plan. I don’t have a big issue with claiming conservative/non-conservative but I’ll wait until I’ve had a chance to consider it.

I worked closing shift tonight and I open tomorrow so I won’t be on until later tomorrow.

Initially, feeling great about Foxcastle, Durga, Ezio
Feeling weird about Vapor
This first post by thamrick seemed suspicious to me, because I did not see any reason to feel "great" about Foxcastle, Durga, or Ezio by page 8.

Nephthys
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:47 am
Location: Not a GM
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#812 Post by Nephthys » Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:39 am

Foxcastle wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 2:09 am
Okay, I do not hate Xorxes proposals.

Vaporware gets some side-eye. The thing where he votes Xorxes, then Durga comments "yikes" and then he turns around and votes Durga could be a thing? But the rest of Durga looks pretty okay to me.

Can someone summarize vaporware's play in (I guess it would be) the last game, since I wasn't in it?

I do not like Bad Cop Squigs. The last time I was in a game with Bad Cop Squigs, I was scum and trying to get him lynched for it, but the truth I was using to do that was that Squigs hates rolling scum and believes he has too many tells, so he has motive to fake a persona.

Claimed conservative: Brainbomb, Xorxes, Durga.,

Claimed not-conservative: Squigs.
Ezio wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:48 am
Xorxes second plan is shit. Nobody else claim conservative or not.
Why is it net negative for town? And do you think it's a bad idea, or a scum-motivated idea?
Following bozo's post above I had a look.

This is pretty much the only post he had (one other small post)

Most of this stuff is NAI tbh

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#813 Post by bozotheclown » Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:41 am

Nephthys wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:30 am
bozotheclown wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:27 am
Nephthys wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:24 am


In none of the previous games have you ever raised this, seems a little weird for you to pull it out especially when I've been right both times before.

Seems a little weird to suddenly change tack, unless there's something else you wanna add?
I do not know what you are referring to in previous games, but it just seemed like you were setting yourself up to be "correct" with a scum read of Ezio.
The previous games just gave me confidence to make this slightly more obvious that I have previously.

Should you wish to check in;
M41 I got darg D1
Last game I got Vapor D1
Both scenarios no one was really reading them.

Here I just made mine slightly more obvious. That being said I don't think he is the right lynch here, probably D2/3
OK.

Nephthys
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:47 am
Location: Not a GM
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#814 Post by Nephthys » Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:42 am

Durga only agreed with xorx's plan and then said squiggs looked good.

This is pretty much the opposite of what Fox said

Nephthys
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:47 am
Location: Not a GM
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#815 Post by Nephthys » Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:46 am

Ezio actually had purely mechanic stuff, and I suppose I can somewhat forgive Vapor for liking this initially???

Despite this he was anti the post the both Durga and Fox had put some sort of backing too.

There really are a lot of direct inconsistencies in this logic.

@Vapor please explain what made these three good.

To give you some encouragement ##vote Vapor

bozotheclown
Posts: 14336
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#816 Post by bozotheclown » Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:49 am

Nephthys wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:46 am
Ezio actually had purely mechanic stuff, and I suppose I can somewhat forgive Vapor for liking this initially???

Despite this he was anti the post the both Durga and Fox had put some sort of backing too.

There really are a lot of direct inconsistencies in this logic.

@Vapor please explain what made these three good.

To give you some encouragement ##vote Vapor
It seems you were responding to my post about thamrick, not Vaporwave.

Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#817 Post by Durga » Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:49 am

Nephthys wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:42 am
Durga only agreed with xorx's plan and then said squiggs looked good.

This is pretty much the opposite of what Fox said
I think I still think Squigs looks good. Foxy, not so good.

Nephthys
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:47 am
Location: Not a GM
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#818 Post by Nephthys » Sun Mar 03, 2019 9:23 am

bozotheclown wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:49 am
Nephthys wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:46 am
Ezio actually had purely mechanic stuff, and I suppose I can somewhat forgive Vapor for liking this initially???

Despite this he was anti the post the both Durga and Fox had put some sort of backing too.

There really are a lot of direct inconsistencies in this logic.

@Vapor please explain what made these three good.

To give you some encouragement ##vote Vapor
It seems you were responding to my post about thamrick, not Vaporwave.
Rip lol


Same as above except @tham

##vote thamrick

Nephthys
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:47 am
Location: Not a GM
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#819 Post by Nephthys » Sun Mar 03, 2019 9:24 am

Durga wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:49 am
Nephthys wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:42 am
Durga only agreed with xorx's plan and then said squiggs looked good.

This is pretty much the opposite of what Fox said
I think I still think Squigs looks good. Foxy, not so good.
Can you lay out a case? I'm off to sleep but would love to read one when I wake up.

damo666
Posts: 20269
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#820 Post by damo666 » Sun Mar 03, 2019 9:51 am

Squigs44 wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:21 am
damo666 wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 1:29 am
brainbomb wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 1:17 am
Kevin Brennan MP (Labour Backbencher)

is my real flavour
Is this true or did you just pick one at random with the 95% chance Jamie hadn't included in game?
How is this question useful in any way?
It sparked Xorxes' GM call (unanswered as yet)

Post Reply