I've got a call GM in, I'm headed to bed now and I assume it'll be answered when I wake up. Might talk more then depending on what happensSquigs44 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 7:47 amHey Ike, can you actually play the game now? You've posted a couple things on Vapor being scum, but your argument is weak and your vote looks forced. Can you either give a more succinct and solid case on Vapor or do some solid scumhunting elsewhere? This Durga thing is a distraction, so ignore it for the time being.
MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
-
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:35 pm
- Location: Locked in Bo_Sox's Basement
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
This post also makes comments without implications. Can you follow through with your comments and give us conclusions, or ask questions to players to further development your read?thamrick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 4:47 amVapor/Attorney interaction early on (~p. 13-15) seems very unlikely to be scum/scum to me.
I don't like Percy's vote for Vapor at the top of 16 (For ref). It looks like a joke vote, but it's at a period where people actually were scumreading Vapor and he was the center of the recent discussion. Seems like a vote to keep momentum going, but in a format that would allow him to absolve himself later, claiming it was just a joke.
damo seems like he's just commenting to comment. Taking things out of context and not really making implications from his comments.
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
Also just FYI, I wont be on at EOD, probs for the last 4-5 hours cause of work will check tomorrow morning and read as much as I can
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
The stream of consciousness here is good, but it would be more helpful if you drew stronger conclusions emc. Emc is my top townread behind Xorxes rn.e.m.c^42 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 2:56 amboth vecna and neph have tried to give thoughts based on nonmech, but I have a feeling that people are waiting for vecna catching up tomorrow lol (before establishing more of an opinion)
since a good amount happened after he left.
Neph/Vapor/Xorxes so far seem okay, they've each made somewhat individual points and poked them. the latter two have been significantly different from the only reference I have, last game, which is making me feel like it's a good thing so far. Neph is Neph, don't think it's been long enough for him to shine.
Attorney seems to be fulfilling the secondary lulz role, which is causing some people to dislike him a bit? (haven't referenced, so margin of error is large)
Haven't really seen anything too serious yet, but at least he's semiactive. Going to wait and see if he actually tries to produce anything.
Squigs I seem to only recall math...and more math xD (is he usually a maths guy?)
and mech, but more recently he's commented reads, just spread out among posts. And @Squigs to reply why brain is in noncon, I'm just going to move him whenever is changes lol--all I did was digitize something I already had on paper to help me try to follow along.
Also, I'm a math major, so yes, I math a lot.
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
So you want him to explain his thought process for each of his posts in the game? Well, maybe not that in-depth, but for each of his reads?
-
- Posts: 14336
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
In none of the previous games have you ever raised this, seems a little weird for you to pull it out especially when I've been right both times before.
Seems a little weird to suddenly change tack, unless there's something else you wanna add?
-
- Posts: 14336
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
I do not know what you are referring to in previous games, but it just seemed like you were setting yourself up to be "correct" with a scum read of Ezio.Nephthys wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:24 amIn none of the previous games have you ever raised this, seems a little weird for you to pull it out especially when I've been right both times before.
Seems a little weird to suddenly change tack, unless there's something else you wanna add?
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
The previous games just gave me confidence to make this slightly more obvious that I have previously.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:27 amI do not know what you are referring to in previous games, but it just seemed like you were setting yourself up to be "correct" with a scum read of Ezio.
Should you wish to check in;
M41 I got darg D1
Last game I got Vapor D1
Both scenarios no one was really reading them.
Here I just made mine slightly more obvious. That being said I don't think he is the right lynch here, probably D2/3
-
- Posts: 14336
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
This first post by thamrick seemed suspicious to me, because I did not see any reason to feel "great" about Foxcastle, Durga, or Ezio by page 8.thamrick wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 4:31 amChecking in to say that I admittedly haven’t read the setup close enough to comment on the benefit of xorxes’ plan. I don’t have a big issue with claiming conservative/non-conservative but I’ll wait until I’ve had a chance to consider it.
I worked closing shift tonight and I open tomorrow so I won’t be on until later tomorrow.
Initially, feeling great about Foxcastle, Durga, Ezio
Feeling weird about Vapor
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
Following bozo's post above I had a look.Foxcastle wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 2:09 amOkay, I do not hate Xorxes proposals.
Vaporware gets some side-eye. The thing where he votes Xorxes, then Durga comments "yikes" and then he turns around and votes Durga could be a thing? But the rest of Durga looks pretty okay to me.
Can someone summarize vaporware's play in (I guess it would be) the last game, since I wasn't in it?
I do not like Bad Cop Squigs. The last time I was in a game with Bad Cop Squigs, I was scum and trying to get him lynched for it, but the truth I was using to do that was that Squigs hates rolling scum and believes he has too many tells, so he has motive to fake a persona.
Claimed conservative: Brainbomb, Xorxes, Durga.,
Claimed not-conservative: Squigs.
Why is it net negative for town? And do you think it's a bad idea, or a scum-motivated idea?
This is pretty much the only post he had (one other small post)
Most of this stuff is NAI tbh
-
- Posts: 14336
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
OK.Nephthys wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:30 amThe previous games just gave me confidence to make this slightly more obvious that I have previously.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:27 amI do not know what you are referring to in previous games, but it just seemed like you were setting yourself up to be "correct" with a scum read of Ezio.
Should you wish to check in;
M41 I got darg D1
Last game I got Vapor D1
Both scenarios no one was really reading them.
Here I just made mine slightly more obvious. That being said I don't think he is the right lynch here, probably D2/3
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
Durga only agreed with xorx's plan and then said squiggs looked good.
This is pretty much the opposite of what Fox said
This is pretty much the opposite of what Fox said
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
Ezio actually had purely mechanic stuff, and I suppose I can somewhat forgive Vapor for liking this initially???
Despite this he was anti the post the both Durga and Fox had put some sort of backing too.
There really are a lot of direct inconsistencies in this logic.
@Vapor please explain what made these three good.
To give you some encouragement ##vote Vapor
Despite this he was anti the post the both Durga and Fox had put some sort of backing too.
There really are a lot of direct inconsistencies in this logic.
@Vapor please explain what made these three good.
To give you some encouragement ##vote Vapor
-
- Posts: 14336
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
It seems you were responding to my post about thamrick, not Vaporwave.Nephthys wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:46 amEzio actually had purely mechanic stuff, and I suppose I can somewhat forgive Vapor for liking this initially???
Despite this he was anti the post the both Durga and Fox had put some sort of backing too.
There really are a lot of direct inconsistencies in this logic.
@Vapor please explain what made these three good.
To give you some encouragement ##vote Vapor
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
Rip lolbozotheclown wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:49 amIt seems you were responding to my post about thamrick, not Vaporwave.Nephthys wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:46 amEzio actually had purely mechanic stuff, and I suppose I can somewhat forgive Vapor for liking this initially???
Despite this he was anti the post the both Durga and Fox had put some sort of backing too.
There really are a lot of direct inconsistencies in this logic.
@Vapor please explain what made these three good.
To give you some encouragement ##vote Vapor
Same as above except @tham
##vote thamrick
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
Can you lay out a case? I'm off to sleep but would love to read one when I wake up.
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
It sparked Xorxes' GM call (unanswered as yet)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, DimensionDoors, Ernst_Brenner, Hominidae, Spartaculous, Thomas Choii