What exactly is that supposed to mean?
MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
-
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33937
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Early Chinese construction workers were noted for the small size of their fingernails.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I don’t really want to argue about this with the Snide Remarks Gang, butkgray wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:12 pmI especially disliked his pre-emptive dismissal of people calling it out for being trite.Vecna wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:12 pmI wanted to respond to the first post myself with a "feeling daring today are we"foodcoats wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 5:03 pm
At first this looked not very compelling to me, but I really like your point that "I'd say there's at least 1 scum/wolf in the above group." I'm sure someone else will swoop in and say that's trite or whatever but I actually think that's a fair point worthy of consideration, especially on D1.
Two players haven't posted at all, but I would tend to agree that in the block of "blasé participation" there is probably at least one enemy. I have my personal thoughts about the players in your list but as a heuristic for town to look at today, it's a good starting point.
....but then food swoops in here and starts drooling over "how good a p oint it is"?
wtf?
he listed 9 players. How is it at all interesting to assume theres -at least- 1 scum in there? Thats half the bloody playerlist
1. It’s not a random group of 9 players, it’s a selection based on analysis
2. “At least” means “a minimum of”
3. It says things about HB
I don’t understand the edgy snark, either. Are you 14?
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Hmm, I’m not so sure. This feels like the kind of thing damo would catch as either alignment...yavuzovic wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:32 pmHe pointed out that brain missed the fact that mafia already knows the setup. That was a careful observation and makes sense so +1 point. He townread brain for this. I'm not sure if this makes brain more scummy but damo townread him which means damo truly believed that brain townslipped and it was genuine. I don't think so.
brain and damo are both scum.
I personally don’t think this is a fake townslip from scumbrain, either, but that’s probably more based on his whole iso.
Both damo and brain are in townlean for me right now.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I'm just being self-aware. Bo can't do that.Vecna wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:51 pmimo youre starting to sound more and more like bo_soxghug wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:39 pmWhen we disagree I ignore his opinions.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:29 pm
What happens when you are wrong?
Does Vecna only agree with you when you are right? Surely this would imply that Vecna is the one displaying cleverness and judgement while you just thrash around wildly.
That being the case, why are you buddying Vecna so hard?
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
This post makes brain less scummy in my eyes and makes me suspicious about Bona. Like Bone, I townread Vecna too but he assumed that Vecna is town when writing this. Does Bona know who's mafia and who's not? We have the werewolf though. It's still suspicious and I'm fine with switching my vote to Bona. I just need to catch up so I can see the thread clearer.brainbomb wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 1:27 pmthis implies you think Vecna is town, and an authority over public opinion.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 1:23 pmIt's an early d1 offhand comment. You can't read anything into it.
Do you fear Vecna will sway the game his way?
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Yesfoodcoats wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 11:08 pmI don’t really want to argue about this with the Snide Remarks Gang, butkgray wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:12 pmI especially disliked his pre-emptive dismissal of people calling it out for being trite.Vecna wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:12 pm
I wanted to respond to the first post myself with a "feeling daring today are we"
....but then food swoops in here and starts drooling over "how good a p oint it is"?
wtf?
he listed 9 players. How is it at all interesting to assume theres -at least- 1 scum in there? Thats half the bloody playerlist
1. It’s not a random group of 9 players, it’s a selection based on analysis
2. “At least” means “a minimum of”
3. It says things about HB
I don’t understand the edgy snark, either. Are you 14?
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
You’re working really hard to say not much of anything, RHK... I remember in the last game I played with you, I figured you were too scummy to be scum, and then you WERE scum. I don’t think I can give that pass this time.DemonRHK wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:16 pmYou've never heard of Get this bread?
Obtain this grain?
Receive thus wheat?
Finagle this bagel?
Bone this scone?
Collect this baguette?
Take this cake?
Yeet this yeast?
Elope this loaf?
Wrestle this pretzel?
Solicit this biscuit?
(It really just means getting down to business tbh)
RHK, who are your top 3 scumreads?
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
is belcav the only person this applies too?Maniac wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 10:41 pmAh it’s started. I’ve missed having a reason to waste time playing forum games.
A big hello and how are you to the new players. Or players that I haven’t played with before. If you haven’t played with me before, what’s your experience of Mafia?
##vote Jamie - because I know it annoys him.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I dont think I am ever a little wolfish. Im usually quite scummy when scum.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
what about kakarrotto has been fun so far?
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
thats now two people who have defended kak, stating he was fun, or wacky, or both
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
And the large size of their constructed wallsJamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 11:03 pmEarly Chinese construction workers were noted for the small size of their fingernails.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33937
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I don't know about fun but he's been pretty wacky
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I think the list of wacky people is pretty substantial.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
this is completely untrue. and if anything this is the reason why scum mess up most often. alot of players hit submit without rereading. and it bites them in the ass as scum. not everyone is careful. this has never been true.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 2:20 pmScum players are always (or should always be) self-aware of what their posts look like.brainbomb wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 2:15 pmThis assumes that a scum player (macca) was self aware during a stream of consciousness post that they were being their ordinary self and went and self edited. Im not even sure how this refutes my point that they added faked enthuisiasm at the end to look towny. again this post was from M64 and not this game.Bonatogether wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 2:13 pm
People can edit their words once they're typed brain. I don't buy this.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
how is it possible you liked what we put down when you clearly have absolutely no idea what our debate was actually about?Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 3:03 pmQuick hot take (caveat emptor) but I like what brain, chaqa, and bona are putting down. The caveat is that it could be so much attention paid to meta and the logic or relying/not relying on such that it's a clear distraction from hunting. I don't know, but I don't think I'd put a vote on any of them this early on.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I don't have solid arguements for the following people but I got some impressions by reading the old pages:
Town leaning reads:
ghug
kgray
jamiet99uk
celaph
Scum leaning reads:
Bonatogether
Also Hamilton Brian 's posts sound like a novice mafia. I think I will vote for him. ##vote Hamilton Brian
Town leaning reads:
ghug
kgray
jamiet99uk
celaph
Scum leaning reads:
Bonatogether
Also Hamilton Brian 's posts sound like a novice mafia. I think I will vote for him. ##vote Hamilton Brian
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10409
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Thank you for you opinion. It has not been noted.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I completely agree with that. NAI for DemonRHK but foodcoats can be added to my scum list in the last messageDemonRHK wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 5:11 pm"There is at least one scum in this half of the game" Is not an earthshattering take.foodcoats wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 5:03 pmAt first this looked not very compelling to me, but I really like your point that "I'd say there's at least 1 scum/wolf in the above group." I'm sure someone else will swoop in and say that's trite or whatever but I actually think that's a fair point worthy of consideration, especially on D1.Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 4:58 pmManiac's post...meh, not significant to conclude town/not town.
Damo? Meh, but points some fingers at brain and Chaqa.
Kakarotto? Hmm.
RDR. Not the typical entrance I feel like I remember from them.
Macca: that opening was weird, strangely enthusiastic, but then descends into book discourse.
Demon: not sure how I feel about the opening. Points finger at Bona but then seems to double down on the set-up.
yavu: interesting start. kind of synonymous with Demon.
celaph: is that some early pocketing happening?
ghug: ambivalent about their start. The vote seems to be nothing more than a placeholder until the temperature gets colder.
The remaining 8 players have posted much more so it'll be a longer read from me, but I'd say there's at least 1 scum/wolf in the above group.
Two players haven't posted at all, but I would tend to agree that in the block of "blasé participation" there is probably at least one enemy. I have my personal thoughts about the players in your list but as a heuristic for town to look at today, it's a good starting point.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, brainbomb, Spartaculous