By participating in the context that I originally outlined, kgray does think scum me would use RL as a shield to live longer.ghug wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:23 pmYeah but it's he scum?kgray wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:22 pmworcej is badworcej wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:02 pmDo me a favor - work 95 hours a week for two weeks straight with no days off and in the middle of it have to rotate to graveyards and tell me how much effort you would put into a fucking forum game.
I am fucking over your ‘all you did was start drama’ because I asked you why you are being overly deflective on a certain topic. Your damn right your emotions are in the way.
Also - if you think I would be scum and hide behind RL shit to ‘survive’ longer, then please just simplify it be saying ‘worcej is bad’ and lets move on.
MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
It's not guaranteed that nobody would know about him getting a gun.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Why are you trying not to compare to meta?
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Damo seems off with his involvement today. I’d have expected more involvement around the gun, but I see more effort directed at darg.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Mafia could have held the RB and one of them could be fake claiming. Brain already suggested this.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Scum usually aren't so bold as to waste political capital pushing someone they know is a PR.kgray wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:25 pmI thought you scumread Hamilton because you thought he was acting fake?rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:07 pmI don´t see much to expand. I was scumreading you on D1 because you seem to be just floating, I don´t have this feeling today so you are down my scumlist.Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 6:15 pm
I felt like you were implying it, and if I put words in your mouth, then I'll retract.
Are there any reads you can expand on?
Damo I already explained and I don´t like the way he seems to be preparing to jump into any easy wagon today.
Maniac is my current vote mostly because of the gun, I don´t have a feel for Worcej being the target.
I was scumreading Ghug but Dargo scan granted him at least some time.
I am starting to consider Jamiet as possibly scum, but I don´t know if scum Jamiet will push Dargo this way if Dargo is town.
On the town side, I still feel good about Brain, Kgray, Chaqa and Food.
Why don't you think scum!Jamie would push town!darg like this? It seems reasonable to me.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I believe you're swamped in IRL, but I don't think that has anything to do with your alignment.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Hey. I'm Rivera's spokesperson, you don't get to answer for him.ghug wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:30 pmScum usually aren't so bold as to waste political capital pushing someone they know is a PR.kgray wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:25 pmI thought you scumread Hamilton because you thought he was acting fake?rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:07 pm
I don´t see much to expand. I was scumreading you on D1 because you seem to be just floating, I don´t have this feeling today so you are down my scumlist.
Damo I already explained and I don´t like the way he seems to be preparing to jump into any easy wagon today.
Maniac is my current vote mostly because of the gun, I don´t have a feel for Worcej being the target.
I was scumreading Ghug but Dargo scan granted him at least some time.
I am starting to consider Jamiet as possibly scum, but I don´t know if scum Jamiet will push Dargo this way if Dargo is town.
On the town side, I still feel good about Brain, Kgray, Chaqa and Food.
Why don't you think scum!Jamie would push town!darg like this? It seems reasonable to me.
Also I think that depends very much on who is scum, and I think Jamie could easily do it.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Because the meta I am avoiding is the quantity of posting. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt on posting less at certain times in their life. My usual scum vibes come from when someone posts a lot more than normal.kgray wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:28 pmWhy are you trying not to compare to meta?
Jamie’s posts and tone fit what I would expect, he just isn’t posting as much as I would expect. This catches my eye as interesting, but not scummy.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
And we’ve already established you didn’t like me asking you questions about how you’re playing, thus I must be scum because I am starting ‘drama’ and not contributing.
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 7753
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
- Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Maybe floating isn´t the right term. It´s not fake either. It´s like he want to look like he is making an effort. Today he looks a lot more organic, maybe because we interacted a lot more.kgray wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:25 pmI thought you scumread Hamilton because you thought he was acting fake?rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:07 pmI don´t see much to expand. I was scumreading you on D1 because you seem to be just floating, I don´t have this feeling today so you are down my scumlist.Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 6:15 pm
I felt like you were implying it, and if I put words in your mouth, then I'll retract.
Are there any reads you can expand on?
Damo I already explained and I don´t like the way he seems to be preparing to jump into any easy wagon today.
Maniac is my current vote mostly because of the gun, I don´t have a feel for Worcej being the target.
I was scumreading Ghug but Dargo scan granted him at least some time.
I am starting to consider Jamiet as possibly scum, but I don´t know if scum Jamiet will push Dargo this way if Dargo is town.
On the town side, I still feel good about Brain, Kgray, Chaqa and Food.
Why don't you think scum!Jamie would push town!darg like this? It seems reasonable to me.
If Dargo is the cop, end hammering him will attract a lot of attention and not the good type (it has already atracted).
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Who do you know who actually posts a lot more as scum?worcej wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:34 pmBecause the meta I am avoiding is the quantity of posting. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt on posting less at certain times in their life. My usual scum vibes come from when someone posts a lot more than normal.
Jamie’s posts and tone fit what I would expect, he just isn’t posting as much as I would expect. This catches my eye as interesting, but not scummy.
I think lack in quantity can be made up for if people actually have reads and original thoughts. When normally-active people don't have those things, it's suspicious.
- Bonatogether
- Posts: 10409
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I just got out of school. I'm not going to make a big post during chemistry.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Why are you trying to take my opinions and stir them in a direction not intended by the context?kgray wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:38 pmWho do you know who actually posts a lot more as scum?worcej wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:34 pmBecause the meta I am avoiding is the quantity of posting. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt on posting less at certain times in their life. My usual scum vibes come from when someone posts a lot more than normal.
Jamie’s posts and tone fit what I would expect, he just isn’t posting as much as I would expect. This catches my eye as interesting, but not scummy.
I think lack in quantity can be made up for if people actually have reads and original thoughts. When normally-active people don't have those things, it's suspicious.
What is defined as an original thought versus not?
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
That's not true worcej. I don't like you continuing to berate me for saying I'm bad at the game, especially when I haven't recently been saying I'm bad at the game. It's just noise.worcej wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:35 pmAnd we’ve already established you didn’t like me asking you questions about how you’re playing, thus I must be scum because I am starting ‘drama’ and not contributing.
If you have questions about anything I'm doing that are both a) things that actually happened and b) alignment indicative, then go for it.
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 7753
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
- Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Ghug is tryng to get your job.kgray wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:34 pmHey. I'm Rivera's spokesperson, you don't get to answer for him.
Also I think that depends very much on who is scum, and I think Jamie could easily do it.
I think Jamiet could do it but not do it this game. I can see him doing it if he was all around the thread as a power wolf, but not in this game were his presence isn´t memorable at all.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Thoughts on damo endhammering then?rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:38 pmMaybe floating isn´t the right term. It´s not fake either. It´s like he want to look like he is making an effort. Today he looks a lot more organic, maybe because we interacted a lot more.kgray wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:25 pmI thought you scumread Hamilton because you thought he was acting fake?rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:07 pm
I don´t see much to expand. I was scumreading you on D1 because you seem to be just floating, I don´t have this feeling today so you are down my scumlist.
Damo I already explained and I don´t like the way he seems to be preparing to jump into any easy wagon today.
Maniac is my current vote mostly because of the gun, I don´t have a feel for Worcej being the target.
I was scumreading Ghug but Dargo scan granted him at least some time.
I am starting to consider Jamiet as possibly scum, but I don´t know if scum Jamiet will push Dargo this way if Dargo is town.
On the town side, I still feel good about Brain, Kgray, Chaqa and Food.
Why don't you think scum!Jamie would push town!darg like this? It seems reasonable to me.
If Dargo is the cop, end hammering him will attract a lot of attention and not the good type (it has already atracted).
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
Catch up. I have already asked you this.kgray wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:41 pmThat's not true worcej. I don't like you continuing to berate me for saying I'm bad at the game, especially when I haven't recently been saying I'm bad at the game. It's just noise.
If you have questions about anything I'm doing that are both a) things that actually happened and b) alignment indicative, then go for it.
Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]
I honestly have no idea what you're talking about with me trying to mischaracterize what you're saying.worcej wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:41 pmWhy are you trying to take my opinions and stir them in a direction not intended by the context?kgray wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:38 pmWho do you know who actually posts a lot more as scum?worcej wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:34 pmBecause the meta I am avoiding is the quantity of posting. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt on posting less at certain times in their life. My usual scum vibes come from when someone posts a lot more than normal.
Jamie’s posts and tone fit what I would expect, he just isn’t posting as much as I would expect. This catches my eye as interesting, but not scummy.
I think lack in quantity can be made up for if people actually have reads and original thoughts. When normally-active people don't have those things, it's suspicious.
What is defined as an original thought versus not?
And I can't believe you're asking me to define the word "original" when my point was clearly that people who are normally very present and active but are not contributing (in *content* not just in number of posts) is suspicious.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]