Why?????????
Jealous?

#2881 Post by flash2015 » Mon Jul 22, 2019 8:50 pm
#2882 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Jul 22, 2019 8:52 pm
#2883 Post by Vaporwave » Mon Jul 22, 2019 8:53 pm
#2884 Post by brainbomb » Mon Jul 22, 2019 8:54 pm
I mean we fucked that one time.
#2885 Post by brainbomb » Mon Jul 22, 2019 8:57 pm
#2886 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Jul 22, 2019 8:57 pm
Remind me never to get that drunk again. Your Patrick Swayze get-up was very convincing after the 13th beer.
#2887 Post by xorxes » Mon Jul 22, 2019 8:59 pm
No it doesn't. Percy's, damo's and Chaqa's roles are not among the directly provable. They have no bearing on what I'm saying.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 12:30 pmThat depends on whether Percy, damo, Chaqa, or you are scum using fake claims to avoid getting lynched.xorxes wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:54 am
You are restating the same benefits I stated above. Of the six roles that could be disproven (masons, vig, votestealer, inno child, bulletproof), five have already been claimed: two are proved town, two will soon be proved town, one will have to wait but I know is town, and the last one can no longer be proven, and they will have to make a good case on why they didn't try to prove themselves if they ever claim.
So the upside of your plan, given what we now know, would have been very low.
The downside of your plan would have been that we would not have the hope of benefitting from the few remaining roles that could still be useful (doctor, tracker, commuter, oracle, absorber).
So the way the roles were actually distributed, with town having most of the provable roles, your plan would have been a major disaster, don't you agree?
#2888 Post by xorxes » Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:03 pm
If Jamiet is scum, Divine Presence is one of their fake claims.damo666 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 12:33 pmSeriously?Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 12:05 pmOh, I see.EspressoPatronum wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 3:13 amI'll start the smokescreen reveal.
If I'm Divine Presence, I targeted damo.
If I'm Divine Presence, I targeted myself.
#2889 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:06 pm
You use your powers in your way, and I'll use my powers in mine. Stop being so negative. You've done enough damage in this game already.xorxes wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:03 pmIf Jamiet is scum, Divine Presence is one of their fake claims.
If Jamiet is town, he is being anti-town by ruining EP's test (which also has its downside but I will get into that later).
If Jamiet is town *and* the Divine Presence, he is a complete idiot.
#2890 Post by xorxes » Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:06 pm
Removing a townie's power is not a complete waste, it may help to prove that you really are the DP and not fakeclaiming DP.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 12:36 pmYes. Exactly what I would do. The DP's only power is to turn its target Vanilla. The DP is *forced* to act N1. On N1 I frankly had few hard scumreads and there would be at least as much risk of disabling a useful town PR as hitting a scum.
The problem with town powers that have to be used early is that they have a high risk of harming town. Just look at Rdr's gunshot.
#2891 Post by xorxes » Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:11 pm
Unless I'm missing something, there are two roles left that match damo's claims.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 12:44 pmdamo: claimed to avoid getting shot
Percy: claimed to avoid getting lynched
Chaqa: claimed to avoid getting lynched
xorxes: claimed in case he was janitored
There is only one role left that matches damo's claims, and it is unverifiable. Percy's claim can only be verified D6 if the roleblocker is gone.
Chaqa's claim is unverifiable.
xorxes could be verified D7.
Unless something changes, we have 2 mislynches left, so we could lose the game by D5.
#2892 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:13 pm
There are, but you claimed one of them.
#2893 Post by Chaqa » Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:15 pm
But they have to post at the same time.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 8:22 pmThere are fairly easy ways to verify the masons. For example, have brainbomb post a long series of numbers and/or letters. Then tell the masons to pick a group of 20 or so from the middle, and have one post the sequence and the other post the sequence in reverse order at the same time.Chaqa wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 7:36 pmI hadn't put much thought into the Masons proving themselves, but is there any way we can realistically ever believe them? Like, we need something they would HAVE to talk about separately, but we would also need to know the true answer...
I think Fox and Hosuke are the masons, but how can we ever know for sure?
#2894 Post by xorxes » Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:15 pm
Interesting point. I hadn't thought of that.damo666 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 12:59 pmBozo your comment about me implies you have information than I do. This is not AI of itself but more likely scum than town. Did you townslip, scumslip or make a mistake.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 12:44 pmdamo: claimed to avoid getting shot
Percy: claimed to avoid getting lynched
Chaqa: claimed to avoid getting lynched
xorxes: claimed in case he was janitored
There is only one role left that matches damo's claims, and it is unverifiable. Percy's claim can only be verified D6 if the roleblocker is gone.
Chaqa's claim is unverifiable.
xorxes could be verified D7.
Unless something changes, we have 2 mislynches left, so we could lose the game by D5.
#2895 Post by xorxes » Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:18 pm
I can't make heads or tails of this post.dargorygel wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 1:00 pmI actually amnot fully on board with the mason-claims.
Try this on:
Itso claims by accident (responding, he says, to the massclaim thing.) It's a mistake, and his nervousness shows in his subsequent posts.
The scum team meats later... and decides to make use of it. First, to save Itso, and next to draw out the real mafia.
Why draw out the real mafia? Because they have a checklist of who they think is who. Real Mafia claimants can be checked off their list.
So they decide to offer up Foxy. No real Mason claimants have crumbed. (I don't know why Foxy, yet... it's the weakest part of my theory, atm) He claims to be the other mason.
They paint a picture of missed appointments, time zones, and struggles to connect. THIS is what red flags, for me. It's a QT. They don't have to 'meet up.' You write, "Hi..."
STILL no claimants (which is good, btw... if you, too, are a mason claimant, do NOT claim.) So they are pressed to come up with a plan during D3.
They do.
But it doesn't really prove it. It, too, can be crumbed, hinted, figured out...
And maybe the horse will learn to sing.
If this tinfoil hat is correct, it developed because itso slipped... and the scumteam tried to salvage and maybe draw out some more claims.
#2896 Post by xorxes » Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:24 pm
That would be cheating, wouldn't it? We all play here on the assumption that nobody cheats.brainbomb wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 1:21 pmif rivera dies instead of me I will of course comply with whatever the procedure is that allegedly clears them. just know that I will take whatever looks like a conclusion with a grain of salt. what youre describing sounds like you could easily just set up a discord with each other and fake the whole thing without anyone being able to prove it
#2897 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:27 pm
What is Dargorygel talking about here?dargorygel wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 1:00 pmI actually amnot fully on board with the mason-claims.
<snip>
The scum team meats later... and decides to make use of it. First, to save Itso, and next to draw out the real mafia.
Why draw out the real mafia? Because they have a checklist of who they think is who. Real Mafia claimants can be checked off their list.
#2898 Post by xorxes » Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:30 pm
What could it mean other than "some time after the current phase"?bozotheclown wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 1:49 pmI suppose it could be 2 depending on your interpretation of what counts as "later in the game".
#2899 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:37 pm
#2900 Post by dargorygel » Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:37 pm