Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5081 Post by Durga » Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:44 pm

honestly you are such a pleasant person that the fact that you're edgy and annoyed and throwing shade like that is sus in itself.

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5082 Post by Foxcastle » Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:46 pm

Durga wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:43 pm
foxy you are really not doing a good job of convincing me that you are anything but scum when you attack me like that. at least engage with what i'm saying rather than just throw weird shade.
I've been getting weird shade from you for days now!

And I don't need to convince you I'm town. You know it already, don't you...

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5083 Post by Foxcastle » Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:46 pm

Durga wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:44 pm
honestly you are such a pleasant person that the fact that you're edgy and annoyed and throwing shade like that is sus in itself.
Oh, this is neither edgy nor annoyed. This is actually me having fun.

Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5084 Post by Durga » Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:48 pm

Foxcastle wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:46 pm
Durga wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:43 pm
foxy you are really not doing a good job of convincing me that you are anything but scum when you attack me like that. at least engage with what i'm saying rather than just throw weird shade.
I've been getting weird shade from you for days now!

And I don't need to convince you I'm town. You know it already, don't you...
i'm literally voting you. idk what to tell you

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5085 Post by Foxcastle » Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:49 pm

Another way the judge power is anti-town: vote analysis for D2 is crap.

teacon7
Posts: 1253
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 7:48 pm
Location: Midwestern USA
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5086 Post by teacon7 » Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:50 pm

Durga wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:32 pm
peterlund wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:31 pm
teacon7 wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 5:59 pm

c) I was not shading rdriv. I was trying to solve the game. I considered an alternate possibility to explain the events we knew. I showed my work, and explained my final conclusion: having considered it all, it is most probable that rdrivera was town and telling the truth.
You were distracting town at that time with this ludicrous theory. This kind of distraction is very anti-town unless you have really good reasons to present that kind of theories. My feeling reading you is that you all game has been more interested in presenting odd theories, and not cared much how this possibly would negatively affect/distract town.
He continuously distracts town and scum reads people with no real basis. That's what makes Teacon so hard to read because he wastes time as town too.
Considering a theory is not the same thing as scumreading people. Lateral thinking helps you imagine possibilities. If you see value in having a diverse set of perspectives on solving a problem, it's really helpful for coming up with a sound solution we can have a consensus on. If you'd rather I just tunnelled someone into the ground myopically

If someone says:
what if X is scum? that would mean X's actions towards Y can be explained this way. But Z happened, so it's not likely that X is scum.
That's not scumreading X. that's giving a gigantic if(); then(); statement and seeing where it leads.

I did this sort of speculative thing last game too, remember? When xorx and I got into a huge fight and I speculated he bussed the gf day one? By the end I thought (and was telling people) that it was TvT. Lateral thinking.

The notion of "what if rdriv is lying" was a similar sort of thought experiment. As balki just demonstrated, we shouldn't take uncc'd claims at face value. Recall that at the end of it I didn't push rdriv or any of the claimants. Why would scum!teacon try to shade rdriv d3, only to kill him n3? Do the thought experiment yourself... it doesn't make any sense.

Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5087 Post by Durga » Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:50 pm

aight

p sure fox is scum so i feel good about this. he also refused to answer why connor over damo, which is sus and probably he doesn't want to accidentally provide us with too much info since he's going to flip.

i think damo is also scum. not sure why a scum lurker like connor who hasn't been getting any heat would fake a cc here.

teacon7
Posts: 1253
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 7:48 pm
Location: Midwestern USA
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5088 Post by teacon7 » Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:53 pm

connorcompton wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 4:39 pm
Because if there wasn't a possibility, then why would you be asking the question?
Or if you're going the other way, I do think there is a chance damo is Mafia.
I understand.

@conner - why did you wait until NOW to claim?
Were you aware that damo had claimed when you claimed?

Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5089 Post by Durga » Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:55 pm

teacon7 wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:53 pm
connorcompton wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 4:39 pm
Because if there wasn't a possibility, then why would you be asking the question?
Or if you're going the other way, I do think there is a chance damo is Mafia.
I understand.

@conner - why did you wait until NOW to claim?
Were you aware that damo had claimed when you claimed?
on that - what do you mean there's a CHANCE? one of you is lying. the other one should 100% know that the other person is scum.

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5090 Post by Foxcastle » Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:56 pm

Durga wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:32 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:30 pm
Durga wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:25 pm


1. Anchored and lurked
2. I haven't seen you give input on who you scum read and why and haven't read anything that strikes me as particularly townie from you.

I deduce the scum team by finding town and ruling them out as scum. I've seen no indication that you're town.
Weak, and recycled anyway. The lurking thing is utter nonsense. :eyeroll:

And then contradictory. You've been shading me as scum the whole game, and now you're trying to pivot to claiming you haven't seen anything townie from me as the basis?
I don't understand this. Is it supposed to be contradictory?
What I mean is that you've been clearly indicating you think I'm scum, rather than you don't townread me.

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5091 Post by Foxcastle » Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:56 pm

Durga, let's engage:

What is your explanation for why were you and Balki so consistent and similar in your low-level scum push on me without ever actually making a case? I recall that you both would know from previous games this can be a successful method against me.

Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5092 Post by Durga » Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:57 pm

Foxcastle wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:56 pm
Durga, let's engage:

What is your explanation for why were you and Balki so consistent and similar in your low-level scum push on me without ever actually making a case? I recall that you both would know from previous games this can be a successful method against me.
Balki was so obviously buddying me dude.

Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5093 Post by Durga » Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:58 pm

I already hard claimed scum. Stop this nonsense. Stop avoiding my question about damo/connor. It's so goddamn scummy.

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5094 Post by Foxcastle » Thu Jun 13, 2019 7:03 pm

Durga wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:58 pm
I already hard claimed scum. Stop this nonsense. Stop avoiding my question about damo/connor. It's so goddamn scummy.
First of all, "I hardclaimed scum" is silly. Stop it. You're obviously not serious about it, and it's not actually the basis for any conversation going forward or subsequent analysis.

Second of all, I'm just guessing. I don't have a great reason for it, other than that Damo seems more likely, so it's probably connor. I haven't reread either of them, but that's definitely a thing to do before tomorrow.

peterlund
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 1047
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:52 pm
Location: Sverige
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5095 Post by peterlund » Thu Jun 13, 2019 7:03 pm

peterlund wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:31 pm
teacon7 wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 5:59 pm
c) I was not shading rdriv. I was trying to solve the game. I considered an alternate possibility to explain the events we knew. I showed my work, and explained my final conclusion: having considered it all, it is most probable that rdrivera was town and telling the truth.
You were distracting town at that time with this ludicrous theory. This kind of distraction is very anti-town unless you have really good reasons to present that kind of theories. My feeling reading you is that you all game has been more interested in presenting odd theories, and not cared much how this possibly would negatively affect/distract town.
Also I often indulge into this kind of theory making, but I mostly do those in private. Only when I feel I have enough of evidence, I make such theories public. Otherwise I know I will be ridiculed and not taken seriously (and that I am getting anyhow even when I hold back for a while) :shock:

teacon7
Posts: 1253
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 7:48 pm
Location: Midwestern USA
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5096 Post by teacon7 » Thu Jun 13, 2019 7:04 pm

Durga wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:07 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:04 pm
Durga wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:00 pm
Wait wtf we have two roleblock claims??
???

What??
Next time there's a judge, they just need to holster. That power is ridiculously anti-town.
That's what I said. I didn't even want him to use it, and I needed to hear the rb claim first.

I'm like 70 percent damo is scum and Connor was the real rb target. I can't fathom why they would ever rb damo.
They'd be hunting for the BA, of course, to save Balki from getting shot. Once they knew who the BA was, they could roleblock him to the endgame, and balki would just make up stuff about using his scan.

I can't imagine why anyone would fakeclaim rb. Maybe damo thought connor was going to get modkilled? or that he wasn't caught up enough to post anything useful?

Squigs44
Developer
Developer
Posts: 4342
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5097 Post by Squigs44 » Thu Jun 13, 2019 7:06 pm

I'm currently of the theory that both damo and Connor are scum who forgot to coordinate a RB claim. Only problem with that is that would mean they holstered the RB with the BA-lki situation. Definitely would lean damo over Connor though

Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5098 Post by Durga » Thu Jun 13, 2019 7:07 pm

teacon7 wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 7:04 pm
Durga wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:07 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:04 pm


Next time there's a judge, they just need to holster. That power is ridiculously anti-town.
That's what I said. I didn't even want him to use it, and I needed to hear the rb claim first.

I'm like 70 percent damo is scum and Connor was the real rb target. I can't fathom why they would ever rb damo.
They'd be hunting for the BA, of course, to save Balki from getting shot. Once they knew who the BA was, they could roleblock him to the endgame, and balki would just make up stuff about using his scan.

I can't imagine why anyone would fakeclaim rb. Maybe damo thought connor was going to get modkilled? or that he wasn't caught up enough to post anything useful?
I know why the roleblock was used lmao. I don't know why anyone would fake claim it.

Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5099 Post by Durga » Thu Jun 13, 2019 7:08 pm

Squigs44 wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 7:06 pm
I'm currently of the theory that both damo and Connor are scum who forgot to coordinate a RB claim. Only problem with that is that would mean they holstered the RB with the BA-lki situation. Definitely would lean damo over Connor though
WOW. that... that's WOW. if that happened we'd probably lose the game.

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#5100 Post by Foxcastle » Thu Jun 13, 2019 7:09 pm

Squigs44 wrote:
Wed Jun 05, 2019 2:08 am
damo666 wrote:
Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:37 am
Squigs44 wrote:
Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:21 am
I'm not going to be as detailed with my iso of Durga because she has more posts so I can't go through them all one by one, and because I townread Durga.

The main take away I have from Durga is that she is playing with emotion. She seems genuine in her views and each of her posts seems to have a purpose or clear stance. As scum she finds it difficult to solve, but I don't see that frustration here, she is putting in some decent solving. Her opinions and progression wrt Flav and Chippe match my own and seem natural.

@Durga - Thoughts on Tom and Xorxes?
What?
Durga has said herself that she hates playing as scum because she can't pretend to solve. She likes when there are third parties though since she can still try to solve for who the third party is, so this point is a bit muted by that.
Durga wrote:
Wed Jun 05, 2019 4:12 pm
i probably can't properly read anyone in this game because everyone is scum hunting - 3rd party is scum hunting mafia and mafia is scum hunting 3rd party.

damn it i hate 3rd parties
Squigs, what do you think of the above contradiction?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]