Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
honestly you are such a pleasant person that the fact that you're edgy and annoyed and throwing shade like that is sus in itself.
Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
I've been getting weird shade from you for days now!
And I don't need to convince you I'm town. You know it already, don't you...
Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
Oh, this is neither edgy nor annoyed. This is actually me having fun.
Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
i'm literally voting you. idk what to tell you
Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
Another way the judge power is anti-town: vote analysis for D2 is crap.
Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
Considering a theory is not the same thing as scumreading people. Lateral thinking helps you imagine possibilities. If you see value in having a diverse set of perspectives on solving a problem, it's really helpful for coming up with a sound solution we can have a consensus on. If you'd rather I just tunnelled someone into the ground myopicallyDurga wrote: ↑Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:32 pmHe continuously distracts town and scum reads people with no real basis. That's what makes Teacon so hard to read because he wastes time as town too.peterlund wrote: ↑Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:31 pmYou were distracting town at that time with this ludicrous theory. This kind of distraction is very anti-town unless you have really good reasons to present that kind of theories. My feeling reading you is that you all game has been more interested in presenting odd theories, and not cared much how this possibly would negatively affect/distract town.teacon7 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 13, 2019 5:59 pm
c) I was not shading rdriv. I was trying to solve the game. I considered an alternate possibility to explain the events we knew. I showed my work, and explained my final conclusion: having considered it all, it is most probable that rdrivera was town and telling the truth.
If someone says:
That's not scumreading X. that's giving a gigantic if(); then(); statement and seeing where it leads.what if X is scum? that would mean X's actions towards Y can be explained this way. But Z happened, so it's not likely that X is scum.
I did this sort of speculative thing last game too, remember? When xorx and I got into a huge fight and I speculated he bussed the gf day one? By the end I thought (and was telling people) that it was TvT. Lateral thinking.
The notion of "what if rdriv is lying" was a similar sort of thought experiment. As balki just demonstrated, we shouldn't take uncc'd claims at face value. Recall that at the end of it I didn't push rdriv or any of the claimants. Why would scum!teacon try to shade rdriv d3, only to kill him n3? Do the thought experiment yourself... it doesn't make any sense.
Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
aight
p sure fox is scum so i feel good about this. he also refused to answer why connor over damo, which is sus and probably he doesn't want to accidentally provide us with too much info since he's going to flip.
i think damo is also scum. not sure why a scum lurker like connor who hasn't been getting any heat would fake a cc here.
p sure fox is scum so i feel good about this. he also refused to answer why connor over damo, which is sus and probably he doesn't want to accidentally provide us with too much info since he's going to flip.
i think damo is also scum. not sure why a scum lurker like connor who hasn't been getting any heat would fake a cc here.
Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
I understand.connorcompton wrote: ↑Thu Jun 13, 2019 4:39 pmBecause if there wasn't a possibility, then why would you be asking the question?
Or if you're going the other way, I do think there is a chance damo is Mafia.
@conner - why did you wait until NOW to claim?
Were you aware that damo had claimed when you claimed?
Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
on that - what do you mean there's a CHANCE? one of you is lying. the other one should 100% know that the other person is scum.teacon7 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:53 pmI understand.connorcompton wrote: ↑Thu Jun 13, 2019 4:39 pmBecause if there wasn't a possibility, then why would you be asking the question?
Or if you're going the other way, I do think there is a chance damo is Mafia.
@conner - why did you wait until NOW to claim?
Were you aware that damo had claimed when you claimed?
Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
What I mean is that you've been clearly indicating you think I'm scum, rather than you don't townread me.Durga wrote: ↑Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:32 pmI don't understand this. Is it supposed to be contradictory?Foxcastle wrote: ↑Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:30 pmWeak, and recycled anyway. The lurking thing is utter nonsense.Durga wrote: ↑Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:25 pm
1. Anchored and lurked
2. I haven't seen you give input on who you scum read and why and haven't read anything that strikes me as particularly townie from you.
I deduce the scum team by finding town and ruling them out as scum. I've seen no indication that you're town.![]()
And then contradictory. You've been shading me as scum the whole game, and now you're trying to pivot to claiming you haven't seen anything townie from me as the basis?
Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
Durga, let's engage:
What is your explanation for why were you and Balki so consistent and similar in your low-level scum push on me without ever actually making a case? I recall that you both would know from previous games this can be a successful method against me.
What is your explanation for why were you and Balki so consistent and similar in your low-level scum push on me without ever actually making a case? I recall that you both would know from previous games this can be a successful method against me.
Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
Balki was so obviously buddying me dude.Foxcastle wrote: ↑Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:56 pmDurga, let's engage:
What is your explanation for why were you and Balki so consistent and similar in your low-level scum push on me without ever actually making a case? I recall that you both would know from previous games this can be a successful method against me.
Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
I already hard claimed scum. Stop this nonsense. Stop avoiding my question about damo/connor. It's so goddamn scummy.
Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
First of all, "I hardclaimed scum" is silly. Stop it. You're obviously not serious about it, and it's not actually the basis for any conversation going forward or subsequent analysis.
Second of all, I'm just guessing. I don't have a great reason for it, other than that Damo seems more likely, so it's probably connor. I haven't reread either of them, but that's definitely a thing to do before tomorrow.
Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
Also I often indulge into this kind of theory making, but I mostly do those in private. Only when I feel I have enough of evidence, I make such theories public. Otherwise I know I will be ridiculed and not taken seriously (and that I am getting anyhow even when I hold back for a while)peterlund wrote: ↑Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:31 pmYou were distracting town at that time with this ludicrous theory. This kind of distraction is very anti-town unless you have really good reasons to present that kind of theories. My feeling reading you is that you all game has been more interested in presenting odd theories, and not cared much how this possibly would negatively affect/distract town.teacon7 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 13, 2019 5:59 pmc) I was not shading rdriv. I was trying to solve the game. I considered an alternate possibility to explain the events we knew. I showed my work, and explained my final conclusion: having considered it all, it is most probable that rdrivera was town and telling the truth.

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
They'd be hunting for the BA, of course, to save Balki from getting shot. Once they knew who the BA was, they could roleblock him to the endgame, and balki would just make up stuff about using his scan.
I can't imagine why anyone would fakeclaim rb. Maybe damo thought connor was going to get modkilled? or that he wasn't caught up enough to post anything useful?
Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
I'm currently of the theory that both damo and Connor are scum who forgot to coordinate a RB claim. Only problem with that is that would mean they holstered the RB with the BA-lki situation. Definitely would lean damo over Connor though
Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
I know why the roleblock was used lmao. I don't know why anyone would fake claim it.teacon7 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 13, 2019 7:04 pmThey'd be hunting for the BA, of course, to save Balki from getting shot. Once they knew who the BA was, they could roleblock him to the endgame, and balki would just make up stuff about using his scan.
I can't imagine why anyone would fakeclaim rb. Maybe damo thought connor was going to get modkilled? or that he wasn't caught up enough to post anything useful?
Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
WOW. that... that's WOW. if that happened we'd probably lose the game.
Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
Squigs44 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 2:08 amDurga has said herself that she hates playing as scum because she can't pretend to solve. She likes when there are third parties though since she can still try to solve for who the third party is, so this point is a bit muted by that.damo666 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:37 amWhat?Squigs44 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:21 amI'm not going to be as detailed with my iso of Durga because she has more posts so I can't go through them all one by one, and because I townread Durga.
The main take away I have from Durga is that she is playing with emotion. She seems genuine in her views and each of her posts seems to have a purpose or clear stance. As scum she finds it difficult to solve, but I don't see that frustration here, she is putting in some decent solving. Her opinions and progression wrt Flav and Chippe match my own and seem natural.
@Durga - Thoughts on Tom and Xorxes?
Squigs, what do you think of the above contradiction?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]