Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

[ChippeRock]

Which scum would never be stupid enough to all vote onto 1 wagon. 4-2 is probably the worst case scenario.

Not the point. EP said he thought all scum on him so you would expect et voters to be his townreads. The actual split is totally irrelevant. I'm just pointing out that Squigs post doesn't really say much.

"most - if not all" is what I wrote.

4-2 is most. 5-1 is most. 6-0 is all.

The way you phrase it, you seem to make it sound like it's 5-1 or 6-0. 4-2 is pretty close to 3-3, and was not the "most" the way you were referring to it. You don't reference 4-2 and 6-0 in the same sentence with "most, if not all". There's a huge difference between those two vote counts, one is pretty close to being evenly split, the other is completely lopsided.

[damo666]

Which scum would never be stupid enough to all vote onto 1 wagon. 4-2 is probably the worst case scenario.

Not the point. EP said he thought all scum on him so you would expect et voters to be his townreads. The actual split is totally irrelevant. I'm just pointing out that Squigs post doesn't really say much.

"most - if not all" is what I wrote.

4-2 is most. 5-1 is most. 6-0 is all.

Whatever, doesn't invalidate my point.

[EspressoPatronum]

@Espresso, what’s your Tom read again? Give me as much detail as possible.

"Tom Bombadil - His playstyle reminds me a bit of Balki’s, but Tom’s is more critical and doesn’t give as much back. Seems like something I would do if I was trying to mimic my playstyle while also trying to say as little as possible."

The reason I said his gameplay is like yours is because his interactions with me feel the same. I keep confusing you two in my head whenever I read posts from you, and I'm pretty sure the reason for that is the similarity of styles.

HOWEVER, the big difference is that your posts have more critical thought and substance. This isn't a dig at Tom btw... I just think that avoiding giving a lot of detail and critical thought is something scum do.

Maybe he's just too skeptical for his own good. There's a line between being a skeptic and a scum, and I think he's crossed it.

[teacon7]

I'm checking in from lunch at the airport. What's going on and why isn't my vote valid?

[Durga]

I am pretty sure mafia wants EP dead now. And it doesn't make sense to want the "VT" dead. I thought for sure more people would take advantage of the ambiguity of et's position. This is weird.

[ChippeRock]

The first 12 pages of this game was mostly part of the joke stage!! You can't come up with a read based on mostly the joke stage!

WTF are you talking about. yes you can! you can come up with a read in ONE page. jfc

Yes, one page that is not part of the damn joke stage! Jokes aren't viable things to read.

Teacon maybe made a couple one sentence serious posts (maybe at most 4), you can't make a read off of that!!

[ND]

Why post this huge analysis with like less than hour before EOD?

[damo666]

That’s a dangerous assumption I’ve made before, it’s not always true. Particularity when there are only two allowable wagons

What assumption?

About the mafia splitting their vote as least 4-2

Ah that. Ok.

[ChippeRock]

I'm checking in from lunch at the airport. What's going on and why isn't my vote valid?

Vote Espresso vs et. Judge used his power.

[teacon7]

Jamie said my vote isn't valid. Did the judge use his power?

[TrPrado]

I'm checking in from lunch at the airport. What's going on and why isn't my vote valid?

Judge used power. You have to vote for et or Espresso

[teacon7]

Shoot I can't repeat what the gm said. Sorry.

[et]

I'm checking in from lunch at the airport. What's going on and why isn't my vote valid?

Judge used his Role power. You have to vote me or Espresso.

[peterlund]

Ok got it that Judge forces us to vote EP or et.

##vote et

[teacon7]

Cross post.

I don't scumread either et or espresso. Hm.

[ChippeRock]

Why post this huge analysis with like less than hour before EOD?

Didn't mean to. I was trying to finish up my detailed reads on several other people I was planning to make before the Judge used his power before starting my detailed reads on et & Espresso.

[EspressoPatronum]

Not the point. EP said he thought all scum on him so you would expect et voters to be his townreads. The actual split is totally irrelevant. I'm just pointing out that Squigs post doesn't really say much.

"most - if not all" is what I wrote.

4-2 is most. 5-1 is most. 6-0 is all.

The way you phrase it, you seem to make it sound like it's 5-1 or 6-0. 4-2 is pretty close to 3-3, and was not the "most" the way you were referring to it. You don't reference 4-2 and 6-0 in the same sentence with "most, if not all". There's a huge difference between those two vote counts, one is pretty close to being evenly split, the other is completely lopsided.

Some, most, many, all have specific meanings. By saying most - if not all, I am conveying a range of >50-100%. Hence 4-2, 5-1, 6-0

[damo666]

Penny's dropped. 'sideloped' = lopsided?

[Durga]

et if you're a pr you have to claim now

[ChippeRock]

"most - if not all" is what I wrote.

4-2 is most. 5-1 is most. 6-0 is all.

The way you phrase it, you seem to make it sound like it's 5-1 or 6-0. 4-2 is pretty close to 3-3, and was not the "most" the way you were referring to it. You don't reference 4-2 and 6-0 in the same sentence with "most, if not all". There's a huge difference between those two vote counts, one is pretty close to being evenly split, the other is completely lopsided.

Some, most, many, all have specific meanings. By saying most - if not all, I am conveying a range of >50-100%. Hence 4-2, 5-1, 6-0

That's a *bold* assumption. Scum is almost always never going to go past the 4-2 range because it just gets awfully suspicious after that if all 6 of them are associated together.