I see literally no dumb players on the bozo wagon. Care to explain?
Why don't you want to kill a lurker all of a sudden?
#1361 Post by Carl Tuckerson » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:11 pm
I see literally no dumb players on the bozo wagon. Care to explain?
#1362 Post by ChippeRock » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:11 pm
I can say the same for my wagon. They might not be the dumbest players, but they are playing the dumbest.
#1363 Post by FlaviusAetius » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:12 pm
This is literally just how Teacon plays, you saying this doesnt help anyone no one is going to go on that wagonBalki Bartokomous wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 9:28 pmAnd let me expand a bit more on my views on teacon. This quote left a serious impression:It is a question that seems to reflect a desire to look solvey, more than an intention to solve. Somebody else identified Bozo and Moscow as the two lurkers so far. And so teacon asks Bozo what he thinks of the lurker policy, like it's some kind of riddle where you have to ask the guy who always lies "what would the other guy say" about the guy who always tells the truth to avoid walking down the path with the tiger at the end. Anyone know the reference here? It's somewhere deep in my memory files.teacon7 wrote:@bozo - what do you think of a lurker policy? Would you lynch moscow with us?
Anyway, it doesn't really matter what Bozo thinks of a lynch the lurker policy. The answer is not illuminating and I cannot imagine that teacon cares about the answer to that question, but I feel like the question is posed as a sort of performance art. "Look at me! I'm asking a clever question! I'm town guys! Guys! I'm town guys!"
#1364 Post by Squigs44 » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:12 pm
If this were the case the game would be broken as I explained, which Worcej said it was not broken. You're trying to game the mechanics in a way similar to Chippe.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:07 pmI never said I thought he would be modkilled, only that he would be breaking a rule, and the GM responded to someone's question saying he had not broken any rules. The game is setup so that ChippeRock can't prove he is VT, that does not mean that ChippeRock can't prove he is not VT by making fake claims.Squigs44 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:03 pmbozotheclown wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 5:59 pm
That is very vague, can you tell me exactly where you think my argument is flawed?Squigs44 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 5:55 pm
He thinks if Chippe were VT he would be modkilled, therefore Chippe cannot possibly be VT. This is just as flawed as Chippe thinking he could prove he was VT. You can't prove you someone is not VT for the same reason you can't prove you are VT.
If I was modkilled for posting my own role and not for posting others, I could mechanically confirm my own role by posting all of the other roles that aren't mine.
#1365 Post by connorcompton » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:12 pm
I fully accept I may.TrPrado wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:07 pmNah, he fits my definition of new. You'll thank me later.connorcompton wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:06 pmThis is what I mean. He'll drop the predominantly scholarly* tone and move straight to opinions when he's sure to himself that he needs to pretend someone's scum.TrPrado wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 5:54 pm
CruaaderReynauld:
This one should be a slam dunk. Mark this down as me being right once again. He comes in with the intention to abstain. When he's told he can't he wants to vote no lynch. He says that scum are probably the people who "seem confident about their vote" and says he wants to "see how people see him" so it's "best to not talk too much" which I'm going to break down piece by piece.
This mindset is one of scum. A new scum player, which I define as someone playing their first game on the site and draws scum in said game. Sure new town can be scared too. Sure new town can post less. But those aren't factors I'm looking at when I determine where he falls in how he falls in the criterion of Confidence in their early posts.
Does this player defer to the opinion of more experienced players?
Does this player think that it is better to take a back seat and allow more experienced players to drive the whole of discussion?
If the answer to both of the above is yes, then we've reeled in a player who behaves the way a new scum player does. And for Cruaader the answer to both of the above is yes.
The second criterion is...
Something the rest of town forgot and isn't yet something to look for so I'm keeping it close to my chest.
I'm not convinced your scum, TrPrado, but stuff like this doesn't help. I know Cruaader has said he's not new, but being COMPLETELY CONVINCED that who you believed to be a new player is clearly scum is unacceptable.
#1366 Post by Foxcastle » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:12 pm
Same question as for Durga: which are scum?ChippeRock wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:11 pmI can say the same for my wagon. They might not be the dumbest players, but they are playing the dumbest.
#1367 Post by Durga » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:12 pm
go ahead and read why i think he's scum. i even posted reasons this time!!! all his posts are forcedCarl Tuckerson wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:11 pmI see literally no dumb players on the bozo wagon. Care to explain?
Why don't you want to kill a lurker all of a sudden?
#1368 Post by ChippeRock » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:12 pm
If you want people to lynch other people, you should probably to provide a detailed justification on why that person is scum.
#1369 Post by Squigs44 » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:13 pm
Nephs playing? You could possibly persuade me. What's the case, just that he's a lurker?
#1370 Post by Durga » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:13 pm
i don't know tbh, but they are dumb and their reasons for voting bozo are dumbFoxcastle wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:12 pmSame question as for Durga: which are scum?ChippeRock wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:11 pmI can say the same for my wagon. They might not be the dumbest players, but they are playing the dumbest.
#1371 Post by Carl Tuckerson » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:13 pm
I'm impressed that you're committing to this enough not to vote in self-defense and think this is a strong reason to townread you.FlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:08 pmYes but this is DAY ONE, we shouldn't kill lurkers DAY ONESquigs44 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:07 pmWhy do people keep using the "they have played too bad to be scum" or "they have put in too little effort to be scum" arguments? That just gives an incentive for everyone to play anti-town. Scum can and will lurk, play dumb, and play disinterested, especially if this is how we treat those kinds of people.
#1372 Post by FlaviusAetius » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:13 pm
If bozo is a lurker(im on page 42, so I dont know yet) then why are YOU voting for him??Carl Tuckerson wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:11 pmI see literally no dumb players on the bozo wagon. Care to explain?
Why don't you want to kill a lurker all of a sudden?
#1373 Post by bozotheclown » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:13 pm
Those all say the same thing I am currently saying, that ChippeRock is scum and was claiming to be able prove he is VT as a scum ploy.et wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:09 pmI already pointed.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:03 pmPlease point out where you think I have "obviously lied"?
bozotheclown
Day-1 28:09
page 30 / orig
↑Foxcastle: "And Bozo is back! We're all* very** curious** about your vote, Bozo.
[* Those of us interested in the game, anyway]
[*..."
What ChippeRock is doing seems like a scum ploy.
bozotheclown
Day-1 22:13
page 39 / orig
↑rdrivera2005: "Bozo, you are usually better then this. Could you present what is the scum motivation for Chippe to do this? Or do you b..."
I am sure his motivation was to look like a VT, but it really does not matter, since his own claims have confirmed him as scum.
Please tell me why did you post these.
#1374 Post by ChippeRock » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:14 pm
Vague and unspecific as always Durga.Durga wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:13 pmi don't know tbh, but they are dumb and their reasons for voting bozo are dumbFoxcastle wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:12 pmSame question as for Durga: which are scum?ChippeRock wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:11 pm
I can say the same for my wagon. They might not be the dumbest players, but they are playing the dumbest.
you're being way too moderate and it's making me sus foxy
#1375 Post by Durga » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:14 pm
no, i posted why a few pages back. empty posts that say garbage with the intent of trying to provide something. fake reasons to scum read someone, drops a vote on teacon and dips, has been lurking for like the past hour and hasn't posted. this is really our best bet tbh
#1376 Post by Carl Tuckerson » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:15 pm
Because you are presently going to die if I don't.FlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:13 pmIf bozo is a lurker(im on page 42, so I dont know yet) then why are YOU voting for him??Carl Tuckerson wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:11 pmI see literally no dumb players on the bozo wagon. Care to explain?
Why don't you want to kill a lurker all of a sudden?
Do you think lurkers are bad to kill Day one?
Come back to TrPrado we can still kill him I have no clue why you keep jumping off
#1377 Post by Tom Bombadil » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:15 pm
Are you reading the thread Chippe? Cuz she did, this just makes it look like you want to throw shade for the sake of casting doubtsChippeRock wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:12 pmIf you want people to lynch other people, you should probably to provide a detailed justification on why that person is scum.
#1378 Post by Foxcastle » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:15 pm
Ironic. I forgot who said that I was being too aggressive (based on my GM flavor)Durga wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:13 pmi don't know tbh, but they are dumb and their reasons for voting bozo are dumbFoxcastle wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:12 pmSame question as for Durga: which are scum?ChippeRock wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:11 pm
I can say the same for my wagon. They might not be the dumbest players, but they are playing the dumbest.
you're being way too moderate and it's making me sus foxy
#1379 Post by FlaviusAetius » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:16 pm
This explains everything of why we shouldnt be going after bozo.teacon7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 9:51 pmreally what's worth looking for is people who are posting just enough to avoid the lurker label, but not really committing anything in terms of behavior (i.e., hunting) or opinions (i.e., reads when we get to that stage of the game). the problem with a huge game like this is that there's so much room to lurk that it's hard to find.
#1380 Post by FlaviusAetius » Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:16 pm
Ok but we still have time, this is more than enough time, we can still change wagonsCarl Tuckerson wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:15 pmBecause you are presently going to die if I don't.FlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:13 pmIf bozo is a lurker(im on page 42, so I dont know yet) then why are YOU voting for him??Carl Tuckerson wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:11 pm
I see literally no dumb players on the bozo wagon. Care to explain?
Why don't you want to kill a lurker all of a sudden?
Do you think lurkers are bad to kill Day one?
Come back to TrPrado we can still kill him I have no clue why you keep jumping off
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, Bing [Bot], DiplomacyandWarfare, Google [Bot], Spartaculous