Cogito ergo cogito. Cogito.
MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
@Attorney
Brain not Brian
GM will no doubt accept but not won't. Please recast your vote.
-
- Gold Donator
- Posts: 7753
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
- Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
- Contact:
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
I am having problems catching up with the game because of my real life activities. I tried last night and just felt asleep. Readed the last pages now.
I think bb meltdown with Durga isn't alignment indicative, he is probably really offended, specially because of the prior interactions with Durga, I hope this don't derail the game. The retracting on the claim is the problematic thing. Brain is fully capable of fake claiming as town, and a no-con claiming con isn't bad as Xorxes already pointed as it gives cover to the cop . But why retract? This just seems bb trying to muddy the waters like last game or maybe trying to signal something to the Mafia team.
##vote brainbomb for now while I try to re-read a bit.
I think bb meltdown with Durga isn't alignment indicative, he is probably really offended, specially because of the prior interactions with Durga, I hope this don't derail the game. The retracting on the claim is the problematic thing. Brain is fully capable of fake claiming as town, and a no-con claiming con isn't bad as Xorxes already pointed as it gives cover to the cop . But why retract? This just seems bb trying to muddy the waters like last game or maybe trying to signal something to the Mafia team.
##vote brainbomb for now while I try to re-read a bit.
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
I don't remember Vapor posting so much contentless shit as scum, but I was scum with him so maybe I just wasn't paying attention. In any case, I want to lynch a conservative today so he has a pass for now, but we need more substance.Vaporwave wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 2:08 ammy nicks for some peeps with longish usernames:
attorney - noah or atto
bozotheclown - bozo
Foxcatle- Fox
Nephthys - Neph (although his username sounds so royal, so majestic I feel like trash trying to shorten it)
RagingIke - Rag? or RI
speak now if you have an issue with this or forever keep silent
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
Do you think that's scum-indicative?RagingIke297 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 2:17 amVaporwave is posting way to much stuff that is irrelevant, talking about last game, Jamie's age ect....
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
And what was the conclusion from your experiment?RagingIke297 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 2:24 amI voted Durga with no explaination because she has been pretty composed so far this game and I wanted to see how thick her skin was
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
I feel like theres competing focus, like xorxes wants to catch walleye, attorney wants to start a law firm, Squiggs is like Pat Robertson this game, and what is the deal with moscow?
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
The problem with this post is that while all the reads are probably accurate, the reasons for them are all wrong.RagingIke297 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 2:47 amI don't normally have opinions on day 1, at least not very many. Here's what I got:
Xorxes I read town, he came up with the claim idea and it seems beneficial to town
Brain I read scum, there's no reason for a conservative townie to not claim it, he claimed it, flipped to the other side and then when questioned flipped back, doesn't add up...
Durga I read scum, but that's just wishful thinking
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
Note: thamrick reappears but doesn't address the conservative question. I still have a few pages to read though.thamrick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 4:47 amVapor/Attorney interaction early on (~p. 13-15) seems very unlikely to be scum/scum to me.
I don't like Percy's vote for Vapor at the top of 16 (For ref). It looks like a joke vote, but it's at a period where people actually were scumreading Vapor and he was the center of the recent discussion. Seems like a vote to keep momentum going, but in a format that would allow him to absolve himself later, claiming it was just a joke.
damo seems like he's just commenting to comment. Taking things out of context and not really making implications from his comments.
I agree Vapor/Attorney unlikely to be scum/scum. My take at the moment is town/town.
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
This, OTOH, I can easily read as scum/scum.
Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD
Percy gets points for this. Not necessarily townie points, just points.Percy Williams wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 5:17 amAren't they called goals, not touchdowns in Football? I'm not a sports expert, but I think you're not describing football, especially as "taking the football" sounds like you're picking it up.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Hominidae