MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25699
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#481 Post by brainbomb » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:31 pm

Vaporwave wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:31 pm
Squigs44 wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:28 pm
flash2015 wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 12:36 pm
##VOTE Attorney
Was this an OMGUS vote Flash, or do you actually have good reasons to vote him?
it seems that according to your buddy Attorney, asking for reasons for vote is a scum-tell

thus you're scum
##Vote Squiggs

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#482 Post by xorxes » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:32 pm

Nephthys wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:21 pm
xorxes wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:19 pm
Nephthys wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 7:52 pm

Town - Fox, Xorx
Weak town - Squigs
Null - Brain - Durga
Weak Scum - EMC
Scum - V/A, Percy, Ezio
Why is Fox town again?

Are you conservative or not?
I have reasons based on what I've observed, considering he hasn't stated the logic I want to respect that and not out him.

Although I will say my logic is a little WIFOM although it seemed too bold to be scum and I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt rn
Alright, and the second question?

Squigs44
Developer
Developer
Posts: 4342
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#483 Post by Squigs44 » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:32 pm

Attorney wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:06 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:04 pm
Attorney wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:02 pm
do y'all think we should do the end hammer soon or no
imo the game is moving slow and we need a flip sometime soon
Settle in, it's gonna be a long game...
true lol
what are your thoughts on flash also
This exchange looks bad for Attorney

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25699
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#484 Post by brainbomb » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:32 pm

domald trumps hair bitch

Nephthys
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:47 am
Location: Not a GM
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#485 Post by Nephthys » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:34 pm

xorxes wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:32 pm
Nephthys wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:21 pm
xorxes wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:19 pm


Why is Fox town again?

Are you conservative or not?
I have reasons based on what I've observed, considering he hasn't stated the logic I want to respect that and not out him.

Although I will say my logic is a little WIFOM although it seemed too bold to be scum and I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt rn
Alright, and the second question?
You've legit posted about my claim already... I claimed conservative

Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#486 Post by Durga » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:34 pm

Squigs44 wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:32 pm
Attorney wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:06 pm
Foxcastle wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:04 pm


Settle in, it's gonna be a long game...
true lol
what are your thoughts on flash also
This exchange looks bad for Attorney
Not really? Why?

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25699
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#487 Post by brainbomb » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:35 pm

nothing can be gleaned from vecnas entry to the game. his catchups never actually culminate in real ideas. its his way of fulfilling empty content quota

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#488 Post by xorxes » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:36 pm

Nephthys wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:34 pm
xorxes wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:32 pm
Nephthys wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:21 pm


I have reasons based on what I've observed, considering he hasn't stated the logic I want to respect that and not out him.

Although I will say my logic is a little WIFOM although it seemed too bold to be scum and I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt rn
Alright, and the second question?
You've legit posted about my claim already... I claimed conservative
Oops, you're right.

So Moscow, thamrick and Vecna, are any of you conservatives?


Squigs44
Developer
Developer
Posts: 4342
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#490 Post by Squigs44 » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:38 pm

Durga wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:34 pm
Squigs44 wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:32 pm
Attorney wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:06 pm


true lol
what are your thoughts on flash also
This exchange looks bad for Attorney
Not really? Why?
The first post was really awkward, asking for direction but not wanting to seem like a leader at all. Also, majority hammering this soon is just bad.
Then, when he gets the slightest hint of resistance, he abandons it and switches topics, asking someone about the guy voting for him.
He is being reactive rather than active, which is typically more scum-behavior than town.

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25699
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#491 Post by brainbomb » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:39 pm

xorxes doesnt seem like he actually put much thought into using his conjob claim idea. Hes just sort of nonchalantly encouraged it and its actually squiggs who put all the forced desperation into its groundwork.

xorxes reminds me of tom from last game. which is good for xorxes.

big, muscly, hunkish thread presence. 10/10 would fuck

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25699
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#492 Post by brainbomb » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:41 pm

Ive literally just been looking up names of british conservatives on google lol

e.m.c^42
Posts: 6320
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 7:00 pm
Location: Rated 0/5 Stars; ☆☆☆☆☆
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#493 Post by e.m.c^42 » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:48 pm

to post(s) that take too long to quote, you guys can prolly tell which is in response to what based on subject:

for Attorney/Vapor thing, it feels more on Vapor's side than Attorney? At least, more talking from him lol

Attorney is harder for me to follow logic-wise, so dunno if I'm tired atm or he's jump-thinking or fake jump-thinking

@Neph, what is SoC?

and I will say it's pretty much impossible for me to be as active as last time, I was online 16/17-ish hours daily then...(guess which dumbass is failing math after playing mafia through more than a week of lectures xd)

I can't recall anything to compare about for Squigs or Worcej as they were both GM'ing, and I've run out of brain storage for older stuff :'D
but almost everyone was/is doing mechanics from xorxes, so I'm not too sure how it would be scum-indicative for some and not others? Is is based on how much of other stuff they did?

And yes Brain, 3rd in posts was a bit quiet for you, but then again, you aren't deliberately spamming to derail--you've started posting again in the past 5-10 minutes or so tho, so it's better now

this is unrelated but tbh I thought xorxes was joking when he first proposed his idea, was a bit surprised when it was taken seriously + how it derailed the tone xD

Squigs44
Developer
Developer
Posts: 4342
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#494 Post by Squigs44 » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:49 pm

Foxcastle wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:43 pm
Vaporwave wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:21 pm
explain what's scummy

quote a post and say why
Your first vote on Xorxes was trying to draw a connection between his alignment in a previous game, which has no bearing on this one. And then you did it again.

Your switch to Durga was weird and unjustified, like you noticed you weren't getting traction on Xorxes and wanted to move your vote so it wouldn't draw attention. You tried to make it look like you were pressure voting, but were unconvincing, in no small part because it looks opportunistic rather than pressure.

You initially liked Xorxes' plan, but then pushed back against it because you wanted consensus and then because you thought it was happening too fast and then because Xorxes is just some rando making demands. To me, that looks like scum being afraid that Xorxes plan will work and so trying to both avoid claiming and tank the plan at the same time.

You are grasping at straws rather than making any real analysis.
Most detailed case thus far, but then Fox didn't follow up with a vote or anything.

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25699
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#495 Post by brainbomb » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:50 pm

e.m.c^42 wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:48 pm
to post(s) that take too long to quote, you guys can prolly tell which is in response to what based on subject:

for Attorney/Vapor thing, it feels more on Vapor's side than Attorney? At least, more talking from him lol

Attorney is harder for me to follow logic-wise, so dunno if I'm tired atm or he's jump-thinking or fake jump-thinking

@Neph, what is SoC?

and I will say it's pretty much impossible for me to be as active as last time, I was online 16/17-ish hours daily then...(guess which dumbass is failing math after playing mafia through more than a week of lectures xd)

I can't recall anything to compare about for Squigs or Worcej as they were both GM'ing, and I've run out of brain storage for older stuff :'D
but almost everyone was/is doing mechanics from xorxes, so I'm not too sure how it would be scum-indicative for some and not others? Is is based on how much of other stuff they did?

And yes Brain, 3rd in posts was a bit quiet for you, but then again, you aren't deliberately spamming to derail--you've started posting again in the past 5-10 minutes or so tho, so it's better now

this is unrelated but tbh I thought xorxes was joking when he first proposed his idea, was a bit surprised when it was taken seriously + how it derailed the tone xD
xorxes always has some idea like this when hes town and thats his not his only quality I like.

Vaporwave
Posts: 2308
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:21 pm

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#496 Post by Vaporwave » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:51 pm

Squigs44 wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:49 pm


Most detailed case thus far, but then Fox didn't follow up with a vote or anything.
it has flaws which I addressed consequently

Nephthys
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:47 am
Location: Not a GM
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#497 Post by Nephthys » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:54 pm

e.m.c^42 wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:48 pm

@Neph, what is SoC?

snip snip
Stream of conscious. You're more sure of yourself this game which I really like, keep it up <3

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25699
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#498 Post by brainbomb » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:55 pm

guys its lobsterfest at red lobstet

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25699
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#499 Post by brainbomb » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:58 pm

##Vote RagingIke

e.m.c^42
Posts: 6320
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 7:00 pm
Location: Rated 0/5 Stars; ☆☆☆☆☆
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#500 Post by e.m.c^42 » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:59 pm

Nephthys wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:54 pm
e.m.c^42 wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:48 pm

@Neph, what is SoC?

snip snip
Stream of conscious. You're more sure of yourself this game which I really like, keep it up <3
aw, you make me blush ///

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Hominidae, RILIANCZE