I don't think that disqualifies it. Plenty of crumbs in previous games have been totally unrelated to the theme. (I blame Tom Bomb for my wild-eyed approach to obscure crumbing...)xorxes wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 4:37 pmIt was not from British law, so not a valid crumb for this game.Foxcastle wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 4:24 pmThat could be (assuming Squigs was using Ombudsman to imply one of the other PRs), but if so, why would you blow it into the open like that? That says to me that you don't think Squigs was actually crumbing... (Or maybe you were joking with your assertion?)xorxes wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 4:15 pm
I think he's crumbing Ombudsman: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/6917
Enough people might believe him at the last minute to mislynch someone else...Yeah, like we'd believe him.If Squigs is scum, it's a nice play, because it lets him fakeclaim either investigative role or possibly even EU negotiator.