Just edited for breaks so it's easier for me to read, lolRagingIke297 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 06, 2019 3:23 am
Putting all my thoughts together in response to LQ
I am 100% hurting the game less than someone like Cfox.
Right now I don't really have any strong reads and I dont have the time or motivation to go sort through all the spam to find real content. Overall Jamie seems like he's more chill than usual
but he did have that one outburst at DT or ND maybe? I dont remember
but it did seem suspect to me when Brainbomb and Jamie voted together for like 2 seconds only to then vote each other at some point after that. I think Brain went right to Jamie.
The new guy EMC is talking way to much to be scum on day 1 with no coaching.
DT seems abrasive, i was glad that durga dropped becuase shes the worst but it looks like DT will fill that role.
Ezio seemed more motivated than usual for a second, which told me he's town becuase he can't get shot and killed by the desperado, but he's since tappered off.
Something else about DT was that he told Jamie he wasn't voting, he was voting for LQ on accident but he had still already voted for THDfrance.
Either way he was lying.
Xorxes, Ghug, and RDR are unimpressive so far, but i am too and I assume they are for the same reason I am, the spam from Cfox, ND, BB and others needs to stop. I was prepared for like 35 pages day 1, we're at 50 and we've still got like 18 hours left.
Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Re: Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
Re: Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
I agree somewhat although in the two games I've played with Xorx he tends to go more into other peoples reads as scum and do more of his own stuff as town. hence I don't overtly scumread him atm.
That being said its a meta read hence why I nulled him.
-
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:35 pm
- Location: Locked in Bo_Sox's Basement
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
Oh, the breaks are just when i had to put my phone down and do work, nothing further to read intoe.m.c^42 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 06, 2019 3:28 amJust edited for breaks so it's easier for me to read, lolRagingIke297 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 06, 2019 3:23 am
Putting all my thoughts together in response to LQ
I am 100% hurting the game less than someone like Cfox.
Right now I don't really have any strong reads and I dont have the time or motivation to go sort through all the spam to find real content. Overall Jamie seems like he's more chill than usual
but he did have that one outburst at DT or ND maybe? I dont remember
but it did seem suspect to me when Brainbomb and Jamie voted together for like 2 seconds only to then vote each other at some point after that. I think Brain went right to Jamie.
The new guy EMC is talking way to much to be scum on day 1 with no coaching.
DT seems abrasive, i was glad that durga dropped becuase shes the worst but it looks like DT will fill that role.
Ezio seemed more motivated than usual for a second, which told me he's town becuase he can't get shot and killed by the desperado, but he's since tappered off.
Something else about DT was that he told Jamie he wasn't voting, he was voting for LQ on accident but he had still already voted for THDfrance.
Either way he was lying.
Xorxes, Ghug, and RDR are unimpressive so far, but i am too and I assume they are for the same reason I am, the spam from Cfox, ND, BB and others needs to stop. I was prepared for like 35 pages day 1, we're at 50 and we've still got like 18 hours left.
Re: Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
we could just hammer the day now so theres not more to be bothered with. we have enough content now to just hammer someone
Re: Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
yea ##vote crimsonfox
##end
this will clear up the thread. and get him back playing my simulator where he belongs anyway
##end
this will clear up the thread. and get him back playing my simulator where he belongs anyway

Re: Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
Oh no, not the analysis type of reading. Reading as in legibility, since it's easier for me in a paragraph form.RagingIke297 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 06, 2019 3:31 amOh, the breaks are just when i had to put my phone down and do work, nothing further to read into
(it's also a bit for others, since with the superblock format, there's bound to be people skipping or only vaguely skimming since it's not entirely comfortable on the eyes.)
-
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:35 pm
- Location: Locked in Bo_Sox's Basement
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
People are already not reading whats been posted, what's one more post to skip over?e.m.c^42 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 06, 2019 3:35 amOh no, not the analysis type of reading. Reading as in legibility, since it's easier for me in a paragraph form.RagingIke297 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 06, 2019 3:31 amOh, the breaks are just when i had to put my phone down and do work, nothing further to read into
(it's also a bit for others, since with the superblock format, there's bound to be people skipping or only vaguely skimming since it's not entirely comfortable on the eyes.)
Re: Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
(what's with the breaks... legit question sorry if I offend)RagingIke297 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 06, 2019 3:23 amPutting all my thoughts together in response to LQ
I am 100% hurting the game less than someone like Cfox. (Break) Right now I don't really have any strong reads and I dont have the time or motivation to go sort through all the spam to find real content. Overall Jamie seems like he's more chill than usual (break) but he did have that one outburst at DT or ND maybe? I dont remember (Break) but it did seem suspect to me when Brainbomb and Jamie voted together for like 2 seconds only to then vote each other at some point after that. I think Brain went right to Jamie. The new guy EMC is talking way to much to be scum on day 1 with no coaching. DT seems (Break) abrasive, i was glad that durga dropped becuase shes the worst but it looks like DT will fill that role.(break) Ezio seemed more motivated than usual for a second, which told me he's town becuase he can't get shot and killed by the desperado, but he's since tappered off. Something else about DT was that he told Jamie he wasn't voting, he was voting for LQ on (Break) accident but he had still already voted for THDfrance. Either way he was lying. (Break) Xorxes, Ghug, and RDR are unimpressive so far, but i am too and I assume they are for the same reason I am, the spam from Cfox, ND, BB and others needs to stop. I was prepared for like 35 pages day 1, we're at 50 and we've still got like 18 hours left.
you don't need to sort through is the thing. I've even started to make ketchup posts for ppl that are busy (like you!). Just posting these thoughts you have at the time you have them goes a LONG way towards helping the rest of the game, as minor as they may seem. I don't know if I *agree* with all your analysis (a brand new player as a wolf is often unencumbered, and if they're getting coached they might be MORE inclined to post then they would as a villa since nobody is helping them). Also I think DT said he wasn't voting for ME if my memory is correct. But either way just posting this shows that I don't think you merely were going for the LHF and going after DT is showing guts
just post stuff even a fifth or a quarter the size and effort of this and it'll go a long way towards convincing people you're town :)
-
- Posts: 614
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:44 am
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
If u think qyas is spamming then stop signing up
Re: Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
Oh what the fuck, I thought this started today not yesterday.
50 pages in a day and a half jesus christ.
I'll be reading for the next few hours, then.
50 pages in a day and a half jesus christ.
I'll be reading for the next few hours, then.
Re: Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
vecna racked up probably 80% of his content in 2 pages talking to himself about gamestate. spam is how we parse things, many things. 25 players theres alot of huge egos and mafia is meant to be a big story.
I think the problem is systemic of game size and phase length.
thus why hammering day 1 solves thay
I think the problem is systemic of game size and phase length.
thus why hammering day 1 solves thay
-
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
Holy shit guys, are you fucking kidding me rn? 50 pages, half of them crimsonfox saying "I like this post"? If you have nothing useful to say kindly shut up so reading the thread isn't so horrible. Like this legitimately may be worse than discord mafia, sheesh.
Also notice how DT lays out how if he was town and he read emc's post, he would ask certain questions of him and supposedly have an inquisitive tone - but doesn't actually do it, instead choosing to focus on thd's response. Why? Perhaps he's less fond of questioning emc than he lets on.
Tom, you say that the crux of DT's argument is that he disliked thd's post because thd didn't follow through on his vote. On the contrary, DT never mentioned thd's follow-through and vote on ghug, and instead was hung up on the actual vote, which as I explained is nonsense.
You say I'm misrepresenting DT here. I disagree. Here's the original post he made:Tom Bombadil wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 4:00 pmNo other reason for my feeling on Moscow. He’s only made 3 posts after all..e.m.c^42 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 3:38 pmTrue, yep. Lynch the people who talk, and you end up with a game of silent mindreading xDTom Bombadil wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 3:24 pmI don’t have additional thoughts than what I’ve said. I slightly townread ND. Scumlean on Moscow. Null on most of the rest. I don’t like town falling into the trap of lynching high volume posters because they have more content to critique D1 where most everyone is going in blind. It seems lazy
Most everyone is null.
Any other reasons for scumlean on Moscow (other than strange logic for voting DT? Could be just being triggerhappy with thinking/posting--but it does seem lazy or something done with little time). From the way people talk about him, he was an active player from awhile back, do you know anything regarding his style?
As for misrepresenting DT's argument, how did you interpret it?
To expound - DT found thd suspicious because of his lack of caring about hi read. thd voted emc implying that emc was lying about being new to mafia. Then right after that the voted ghug without any follow up to his implication that emc was lying. Correct me if I am wrong, but the crux of DTs argument is that thamrick posted a question or thought, then showed no follow through on it and switched to a different vote for no reason.
Then MF comes in here and tries to characterize DTs reasoning as faulty by saying “scum being more likely to lie about being new is a pretty reasonable stance.” - which is totally not the rationale DT presented.
So either MF is trying to shade DT by misrepresenting him (scummy)
Or is not reading the thread closely (either scummy by not reading and scumhunting well, or bad town by not reading and scumbunting well
The rationale presented by DT here is that thd is scum because instead of asking emc why he's lying about being new, thd just assumed the only reason emc would lie about experience is if he was scum. I didn't understand how this was construed by DT as "wanting to look like trying to figure things out". It's literally just an observation accompanied by some pretty simple implied logic; why would anyone other than scum lie about having played mafia before?DoubtingThomas wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 4:56 amhere he is voting you about seemingly lying about this being your first game by inquiring how you knew day 1 is all shitposts
then he ended up voting you
imagine. i am town. and i see a player that claims they are new to mafia. but i think they are lying about it.
i want to first know why they are lying. are they lying because they are scum? are they lying becasue they dont want to out that they are an experienced player? Heck, from your posting at the time, it is possible that you are not not new. maybe you spectated games before? maybe you heard about forum mafia games?
my initial reaction towards you who possibly is lying about being new to forum mafia would be to ask you this question and decipher whether or not you are telling the truth
thd's tone/questioning attitude towards you wasn't an inquisitive one that a town would have.
i saw a hasty decision/scummy agenda where he wanted to LOOK like he is trying to 'figure out' or 'do things' by voting someone for "lying"
like I don't think his reaction towards you was a town trying to figure out your slot
I think it was a scum trying to look for easy reasons to push someone/mislynch someone
Also notice how DT lays out how if he was town and he read emc's post, he would ask certain questions of him and supposedly have an inquisitive tone - but doesn't actually do it, instead choosing to focus on thd's response. Why? Perhaps he's less fond of questioning emc than he lets on.
Tom, you say that the crux of DT's argument is that he disliked thd's post because thd didn't follow through on his vote. On the contrary, DT never mentioned thd's follow-through and vote on ghug, and instead was hung up on the actual vote, which as I explained is nonsense.
Re: Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
last game we saw what swingy end of day chinese fire drills can do.
if we hammer we consolidate and get info now
if we hammer we consolidate and get info now
Re: Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
##Vote damo666
let's try something new
let's try something new
-
- Posts: 614
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:44 am
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
Yes yes phases longer than 36 suck.
Don't know why you guys won't learn that
Don't know why you guys won't learn that
Re: Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
##vote thdfrance
methinks that this is where I vote right now. Less concerned about Angry Jamie
atm.
methinks that this is where I vote right now. Less concerned about Angry Jamie

Re: Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
but alas now that this glorious speech is over I gots to go to sleep. Will try to check in tomorrow in between educating America haha 

Re: Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
ND is proud of Trump rn so hes very confident hes onto scum
Re: Mafia 42 - Space Ghost Coast to Coast - OFFICIAL GAME THREAD
what dt is asking you partially is why would a mafia lie about this being their first game any more then a town would. It's not a sensible thing to do as EITHER alignmentMoscowFleet wrote: ↑Wed Feb 06, 2019 3:47 amHoly shit guys, are you fucking kidding me rn? 50 pages, half of them crimsonfox saying "I like this post"? If you have nothing useful to say kindly shut up so reading the thread isn't so horrible. Like this legitimately may be worse than discord mafia, sheesh.
You say I'm misrepresenting DT here. I disagree. Here's the original post he made:Tom Bombadil wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 4:00 pmNo other reason for my feeling on Moscow. He’s only made 3 posts after all..e.m.c^42 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 3:38 pm
True, yep. Lynch the people who talk, and you end up with a game of silent mindreading xD
Any other reasons for scumlean on Moscow (other than strange logic for voting DT? Could be just being triggerhappy with thinking/posting--but it does seem lazy or something done with little time). From the way people talk about him, he was an active player from awhile back, do you know anything regarding his style?
As for misrepresenting DT's argument, how did you interpret it?
To expound - DT found thd suspicious because of his lack of caring about hi read. thd voted emc implying that emc was lying about being new to mafia. Then right after that the voted ghug without any follow up to his implication that emc was lying. Correct me if I am wrong, but the crux of DTs argument is that thamrick posted a question or thought, then showed no follow through on it and switched to a different vote for no reason.
Then MF comes in here and tries to characterize DTs reasoning as faulty by saying “scum being more likely to lie about being new is a pretty reasonable stance.” - which is totally not the rationale DT presented.
So either MF is trying to shade DT by misrepresenting him (scummy)
Or is not reading the thread closely (either scummy by not reading and scumhunting well, or bad town by not reading and scumbunting well
The rationale presented by DT here is that thd is scum because instead of asking emc why he's lying about being new, thd just assumed the only reason emc would lie about experience is if he was scum. I didn't understand how this was construed by DT as "wanting to look like trying to figure things out". It's literally just an observation accompanied by some pretty simple implied logic; why would anyone other than scum lie about having played mafia before?DoubtingThomas wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 4:56 amhere he is voting you about seemingly lying about this being your first game by inquiring how you knew day 1 is all shitposts
then he ended up voting you
imagine. i am town. and i see a player that claims they are new to mafia. but i think they are lying about it.
i want to first know why they are lying. are they lying because they are scum? are they lying becasue they dont want to out that they are an experienced player? Heck, from your posting at the time, it is possible that you are not not new. maybe you spectated games before? maybe you heard about forum mafia games?
my initial reaction towards you who possibly is lying about being new to forum mafia would be to ask you this question and decipher whether or not you are telling the truth
thd's tone/questioning attitude towards you wasn't an inquisitive one that a town would have.
i saw a hasty decision/scummy agenda where he wanted to LOOK like he is trying to 'figure out' or 'do things' by voting someone for "lying"
like I don't think his reaction towards you was a town trying to figure out your slot
I think it was a scum trying to look for easy reasons to push someone/mislynch someone
Also notice how DT lays out how if he was town and he read emc's post, he would ask certain questions of him and supposedly have an inquisitive tone - but doesn't actually do it, instead choosing to focus on thd's response. Why? Perhaps he's less fond of questioning emc than he lets on.
Tom, you say that the crux of DT's argument is that he disliked thd's post because thd didn't follow through on his vote. On the contrary, DT never mentioned thd's follow-through and vote on ghug, and instead was hung up on the actual vote, which as I explained is nonsense.
and uh, he did react to emc's post, like multiple times, they had a whole debate
http://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/ ... 990#p55990
http://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/ ... 994#p55994
http://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/ ... 002#p56002
http://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/ ... 003#p56003
don't know how you could have possibly missed this
and he was saying thd didn't follow through on emc, WHICH HE DIDN'T! Immediately swapping your vote and ignoring all mention of the previous vote you had is the exact OPPOSITE of following through on something, hello?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Hominidae