What?
Why?
You got no reads?
#621 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:17 pm
#622 Post by bozotheclown » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:17 pm
#623 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:18 pm
Yet you are the only "No lynch" voter.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:17 pmThe 5 voting for me may be well intended but nevertheless misguided town, although I am still not sure about Vecna. However, that leaves everyone else voting for small wagons. Town needs to consolidate and not let the scum hide in single vote wagons.
#624 Post by Nephthys » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:20 pm
Jamie had a read list where he specfically pointed out cFox as new but not LQ. I thought this may have been setting up cFox to have some leeway later in the game and also give himself scope to change his reads quickly.Squigs44 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:14 pmCan you clarify this Nepthys? Are you saying you were scumreading CFox because of what Jamiet said?Nephthys wrote: ↑Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:01 pmGot it,ghug wrote: ↑Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:22 pmK, I'm done trolling Jamie. I really don't see anything scum indicative in Ezio's blatant reaction test, though, and Jamie tends to focus his wrath more on shit that offends him than shit that's scummy when he's scum, so my vote's staying.
Nephthys, how was Crimson "begging" for +1s, and why are you not criticizing me for begging for them myself?
Crimson
Pg4 - posts 5 times, apart from "Hi Quas" the other four seem to me like he's trying to force jokes etc to get the +1's
Pg 5 - lots of smaller posts that add nothing to the conversation except indicating that posts are too long etc. I would have expected maybe one post to indicate that he wasn't going to read through the long posts etc and would come back to it. It just seem off to me.
Note that I called him out for the begging on this page
Pg6 - Seems like he's trying to make it seem as though its his playstyle, with a lack of meta there isn't too much to read into.
I will be the first to admit that I saw pg4 and then may have tunneled. My scumread of him was based MAINLY around the treatment of him from Jamie but the initial posts made me think that as scum he would be more driven to ensure his condition is fulfilled.
#625 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:20 pm
#626 Post by xorxes » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:20 pm
That's so scummy. You're giving him an easy out if he is scum (which he probably isn't or would not have claimed, but maybe he did for towncred), or proposing to waste a town directed kill if he is town.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:27 pm
If you shoot a town you are going to end up getting scum read for it. I would not shoot or shoot Vecna.
#627 Post by bozotheclown » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:20 pm
Don't worry, I will consolidate my vote.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:18 pmYet you are the only "No lynch" voter.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:17 pmThe 5 voting for me may be well intended but nevertheless misguided town, although I am still not sure about Vecna. However, that leaves everyone else voting for small wagons. Town needs to consolidate and not let the scum hide in single vote wagons.
Way to consolidate!
#628 Post by Nephthys » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:20 pm
So to clarify, yes that was one of my top actual reasons for scumreading cfoxNephthys wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:20 pmJamie had a read list where he specfically pointed out cFox as new but not LQ. I thought this may have been setting up cFox to have some leeway later in the game and also give himself scope to change his reads quickly.Squigs44 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:14 pmCan you clarify this Nepthys? Are you saying you were scumreading CFox because of what Jamiet said?Nephthys wrote: ↑Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:01 pm
Got it,
Crimson
Pg4 - posts 5 times, apart from "Hi Quas" the other four seem to me like he's trying to force jokes etc to get the +1's
Pg 5 - lots of smaller posts that add nothing to the conversation except indicating that posts are too long etc. I would have expected maybe one post to indicate that he wasn't going to read through the long posts etc and would come back to it. It just seem off to me.
Note that I called him out for the begging on this page
Pg6 - Seems like he's trying to make it seem as though its his playstyle, with a lack of meta there isn't too much to read into.
I will be the first to admit that I saw pg4 and then may have tunneled. My scumread of him was based MAINLY around the treatment of him from Jamie but the initial posts made me think that as scum he would be more driven to ensure his condition is fulfilled.
This again was based when Jamie was one of my top scumreads.
#629 Post by Nephthys » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:22 pm
Well at least there's no Godfather...brainbomb wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:13 pmAn arrow flies, Ezio has died!
he was Emperor Pedro of BRAZIL - TOWN TREE STUMP
Ancient Era -> Vanilla
Classical Era -> Vanilla
Medieval Era -> Vanilla
Renaissance Era -> Vanilla
Exploration Era -> Treestump
Industrial Era -> Treestump
Atomic Era -> Treestump
Modern Era -> Treestump
Future Era -> Treestump
#630 Post by bozotheclown » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:23 pm
How was not using a shot to take out a town an easy out for scum?xorxes wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:20 pmThat's so scummy. You're giving him an easy out if he is scum (which he probably isn't or would not have claimed, but maybe he did for towncred), or proposing to waste a town directed kill if he is town.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:27 pm
If you shoot a town you are going to end up getting scum read for it. I would not shoot or shoot Vecna.
#631 Post by bozotheclown » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:25 pm
I prefer a no lynch to lynching me, but that is obviously not going to happen. No one is going to follow me onto a wagon at this point, so I will choose the counterwagon that I find most suspicious.
#632 Post by bozotheclown » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:26 pm
Do you still think not using the town directed kill, if that is what it was, would have been a waste?xorxes wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:20 pmThat's so scummy. You're giving him an easy out if he is scum (which he probably isn't or would not have claimed, but maybe he did for towncred), or proposing to waste a town directed kill if he is town.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:27 pm
If you shoot a town you are going to end up getting scum read for it. I would not shoot or shoot Vecna.
#633 Post by xorxes » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:27 pm
What are the reasons the logic is flawed?Squigs44 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:35 pmThis is flawed logic for many reasons.xorxes wrote: ↑Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:38 amWhich post from Squigs did you like? Was it the one that made me squirm?Vecna wrote: ↑Sun Jan 06, 2019 9:24 amQuas and Crimson all feel pretty town so far. Squigs also had a post I liked, though im wondering why he didnt have a bad feeling about Jamiet's p1 posting.
Jamiet felt really tryhard on page1 and it left some big scumvibes in my mouth. His later stuff blended more with his usual playstyle, but ive not seen anything that obvtowns him. Lynch potential.
Damo being weirded out by jamiet, but then sheeping him was like, wtf?
Ghug did stuff but I have no idea what.
This indeed is pretty boring. Can someone shoot me?
Quas and Crimson will have to tell us each other's alignment since they have played together before but not with the rest of us.
Quas and Crimson's back and forth makes me think there is some buddying going on, probably Crimson buddying Quas.
#634 Post by ghug » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:28 pm
#635 Post by Squigs44 » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:28 pm
Which post is the most townie post in the game? Surely not the post he made about the +1's which is purely mechanical, requires no solving, and could easily be crafted by scum.DemonRHK wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:39 amI can try now that I'm home. I'm mostly trying to get feelings onto the page as they come to me.
You've made the single most town post of the game so far. The thing regarding the other karma needing role is more a townslip or a 4D careful omission as scum, and Occam's razor suggests the first.
Jamie is rabid to win this game, I would bet on the back of the issues with the replacement and subsequent loss of town in M40 he wants to show how he can really play and lead town. This is more Inquisition and less Pied Piper.
On Quas and Crimson: Quas puts off a feel similar to teacher a few games backs. Skilled but not scummy. Crimson on the other hand...I have a feeling but I'm not ready to go into it yet.
Town xorxes lives on his ability to gamesolve and be a massive threat as the game goes on, but xorx isn't questioning here, he's commentating. Less Dan Rather and more John Madden if you will. I don't want to get xorx deep into a game and his big reveal is the team with more people alive wins and starts posting MS paint pictures of the MafBot with circles on it.
Bozo was almost purposefully unremarkable in his posting.
Ghug is ghug. I can't tell you yet on ghug, but I'm leaning town for better or worse.
DrC hasn't posted and Thomas's entire contrib has been 'Hello', in addition to Ike and Ezio on the low activity end as well (again, pot; kettle)
#636 Post by xorxes » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:30 pm
Shooting Vecna would be bad, but anyone else, really? You have nobody that you townread even a little? You think shooting you would be better than shooting Vecna?Nephthys wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:36 pm@Ike
One reason I would not give for not shooting Vecna is that if his claim is true it doesn't give us any more information nor prove his alignment.
I think its better that we guarantee some information whatever it is. For the love of god do not shoot Vecna.
Literally anyone else
#637 Post by xorxes » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:33 pm
I was indeed. And I think I got what I wanted from that.Squigs44 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:38 pmXorxes being sneaky here with a leading question on Jamie.xorxes wrote: ↑Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:56 amCan we conclude from this that if you did not ask any questions about a certain role, you are pretty clear on how that role works?Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 05, 2019 11:05 pm
I have been looking forward to this game and I have studied the various roles in detail. I am afraid that having done this, I have many, many questions.
#638 Post by Nephthys » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:33 pm
Genuinely yes, if he shot Vecna we find if his claim is false or not, we already agreed the town and scum vecna may have reasons to fake claim.xorxes wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:30 pmShooting Vecna would be bad, but anyone else, really? You have nobody that you townread even a little? You think shooting you would be better than shooting Vecna?Nephthys wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:36 pm@Ike
One reason I would not give for not shooting Vecna is that if his claim is true it doesn't give us any more information nor prove his alignment.
I think its better that we guarantee some information whatever it is. For the love of god do not shoot Vecna.
Literally anyone else
#639 Post by Squigs44 » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:34 pm
Foxcastle sounds a bit awkward here in trying to defend lurkers.Foxcastle wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:34 amI agree that lurking is a worrying strategy that lets scum go unnoticed for too long. I just don't like that the way you expressed it, and think that it's possible that it's scum motivated.xorxes wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:14 amI still stand by the assertion I actually made, as opposed to the one you made up for me.Foxcastle wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 1:58 am
Here's what you said:
You can pick nits over whether that's an assertion, implication, insinuation, suggestion, or contention. But yes, someone could certainly think "Xorxes is a good player, he thinks we should look at people who haven't posted yet" and then be primed to look for scum there whether or not it's justified.
Yes, we should look at the lower posting people, because there's likely to be a higher density of scum there than among the most prolific posters.
#640 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:35 pm
Just remember you've got 25 minutes to make up your mind.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:25 pmI prefer a no lynch to lynching me, but that is obviously not going to happen. No one is going to follow me onto a wagon at this point, so I will choose the counterwagon that I find most suspicious.
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, Ernst_Brenner