ok, responding to that is hard, let me try to make it clearer with colouryavuzovic wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 11:17 pmPurely statistically, either mimi or (inclusive) bozo being scum is more than 43%. But we also know that they both can't be scum together because then they wouldn't be able to pass it between, then this goes to 37.5%. This is based on no information but the statistics.bo_sox48 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 2:03 pm•••
I came up with four options:
a) the scumteam is comprised of some combination of people who aren’t thinking hard enough to realize that the only person that wasn’t potentially being saved was mimi, because mimi had the sweet potato and passed it to bozo.
b) the scumteam is made up of a group of people that decided they don’t care about the sweet potato.
c) mimi is scum, so the mafia team knew where the sweet potato was going and knew how to avoid it.
d) bozo is scum, so the mafia team knew where the sweet potato was and knew it was out of commission.
I could easily believe option a), especially in a game where more experienced folks like worcej or Chaqa just as two off the cuff examples haven’t really put in any effort but have the background here to fearkill and the experience to take the lead in those conversations. I don’t buy b) at all because it’s just stupid. The last two options also make some sense in a vacuum and, in either case, would explain why the scumteam felt comfortable fearkilling one of the more obvious targets in a game without PRs. Knowing where the sweet potato landed is a wealth of knowledge for one night.
Now we can consider the above information. I think the fact that scum didn't avoid sweet potato combined with 37% chance is not ignorable.
I would therefore put a slight suspicion on mimi or bozo.
Sorry if I'm missing something but is there any benefit to town hiding HPs? We should all claim HPs to locate the night kill, and hiding this information should be scum-indicator, I would say but I also can't see a way scum can and should hide this. Anyway, I think we should all fill up bozo's potato claims list.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:05 pmYes, the SP is still in the game. Also, DreamTrawler said he passed his D1 HP to Control V, so it seems like all HPs are still in the game as well.
And I'm probably missing something here, why is the list updated for N1? Why not D2?
I think about it and see no reason to hide our potatoes. A little forced but maybe you want nobody to fake claim sending a potato by taking advantage of their ownership claim, but then, we can agree to claim ownership after the previous owner makes the claim and the owner then confirms? Is there any downside?bozotheclown wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:10 pmI have not been suggesting players provide there current HP status since there was some objection to that, but I don't see any reason to keep it hidden.
Welcome to the game bb!brainbomb has replaced worcej
I have an unprofessional townread on brainbomb. My reasoning is that, if worcej was scum, Sparta would first fill that spot with me instead of foodcoats. I know my alignment to be town and worcej being filled after food.. even townier?
If you knew that your vote won't be counted, wouldn't it make more sense for you to stand on a single-voter wagon, to prevent confusion for the town? You claimed before EoD1, so still I don't understand what Dip wanted here. I see that you were also trying to tie it but being on a major wagon where vote counts still include you wasn't helping at all.Kakarroto wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 8:19 pmat the time I didn't really understand what dip was going for, why I should switch to mimi, and not myself or something, but in retrospect I understand that he wanted me on mimi so it looks like we tied. But I was sure that my vote wasn't shown on the endscreen, so I didn't understand why he wanted me to switch to mimi, because for me it was the same for the total votecount.yavuzovic wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 10:54 amCan somebody summarize the fabricated tie you tried to make on D1. I tried to read but it's impossible to read the entire day in one sitting. I read kak's couch potato claim and and end of day messages, I can understand why you would tie it but it seems like there was no consensus for it.
Given Kak's vote was null, Dip's switch near the EoD breaks the tie and makes ND the lead, and only leaving to someone else after ND wagon attracts another player. This is strange behavior especially since himself is the second leading wagon.
But yeah, if it wouldn't have been shown in the endscreen, then, if I switched to mimi and it was looking as if the two wagons were tied, but ND still got yeeted, then it would've been very logical to assume that I was telling the truth, even when it wasn't shown in the endscreen
Why is that?
Also I was almost losing my wall post so I'm posting this here and continuing to build another one.
How do you arrive at a 43% starting chance? Is it because neither was nk'ed? Or is that because of something else? How high would be the chance of two other people, lets say, worbomb(or braincej, if you prefer that) and myself? Or between Dream and Will?
Well, there is at least some benefit for hiding the (current) owner for the couch potato, since that changes only at the end of day. If everyone know that X's vote doesn't count the next day, that would significly decrease the impact of the target and can lead to a big info decrease.
Regarding the rotten potato, I think I don't need to explain why that's a bad idea.
For hot potatoes themselves, I guess if ownership is only revealed at the end or near the end of a phase, that should be fine enough. But it also could lead to different behaviour if like, X knows that Y has a HP today and is much likely throwing it in spite, so better not anger them or butter them up. At least that could lead to some conflicting information and people could misread that sentiment, and think someone town is actually mafia due to feeling forced? Maybe I overemphasize that, but I think that's not too little of an issue
a double verification makes sense. It's a bit intensive for some, and people might opt out for it, but I'm not opposed to it. But I think, as in said in blue, it shouldn't probably be right at the start of the phase? Maybe more like the end, or the halfway point, if we have to go through a few of them?
oh, do you know when both of them requested a substitution? If worcej requested the sub out first and foods slot was done first, I would agree with you, that if your slot is town, braincej is most likely town. But if it's just how the two requested the sub out, then it's pretty much NAI. And even then we shouldn't taket hat into account for fairness purposes? Because that can lead to a whole bunch of a thing
well, I wanted to participate in the voting, if I just kept at a single wagon all day, what information would you all gotten from me? That I have the couch potato and like sitting on a single thing? Not very good. Instead I pushed someone that didn't contribute much and that little that he gave was suspicious to me. And while I was wrong, I could've done much worse.
Now at the end, I DID come to the idea that I could vote myself (as I wasn't voted by anyone that time) to not confuse people, but dip shot that down (he thought at the time the vote wouldn't be reduced from t he end result, so that'S understandable)
and as far as I understand it, dip didn't know that my vote would not show in the end result, thus (what I only understood later, not at the time) I should vote mimi, to make it look like the wagons are tied 4 to 4, but then when my vote didn't count ND would still be the dayvote, since it would've been actually 4 to 3.
Later when he noticed that the vote would be visibly retracted from the endresult, he said himself it wasn't necessary. But yeah, since I met backlash to my idea to vote a single wagon (like myself) and I didn't understand at the time what dip actually wanted from me, I stayed on ND
But I never wanted to actually tie the vote so we didn't get a no-kill result, that was the whole point of me claiming it in time