M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
User avatar
Bonatogether
Posts: 10409
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

#541 Post by Bonatogether » Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:33 pm

damo666 wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 5:56 pm
Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 3:36 am
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:57 pm


He seemed quite towny to me I have to say; fairly genuine. I think Mafia would have had a hard time mis-flipping him today. Bit mean to NK the new guy though :-/
let's think

who would be toxic enough to nk a new player?
Everyone. However reading through sf he was anti ghug, dip and red.
i struggle to imagine that someone would fearkill a new person over reads, but i don't have a compelling alternative explanation

damo666
Posts: 20268
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

#542 Post by damo666 » Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:09 pm

Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:33 pm
damo666 wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 5:56 pm
Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 3:36 am

let's think

who would be toxic enough to nk a new player?
Everyone. However reading through sf he was anti ghug, dip and red.
i struggle to imagine that someone would fearkill a new person over reads, but i don't have a compelling alternative explanation
yeah was a bit of an odd kill unless they thout he softed idol in some way (I can't see it).

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 20726
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

#543 Post by ghug » Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:13 pm

Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:33 pm
damo666 wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 5:56 pm
Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 3:36 am

let's think

who would be toxic enough to nk a new player?
Everyone. However reading through sf he was anti ghug, dip and red.
i struggle to imagine that someone would fearkill a new person over reads, but i don't have a compelling alternative explanation
Reiterating that damo's representation of SF's reads is dishonest. He was anti Dip and darg.

damo666
Posts: 20268
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

#544 Post by damo666 » Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:37 pm

ghug wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:13 pm
Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:33 pm
damo666 wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 5:56 pm


Everyone. However reading through sf he was anti ghug, dip and red.
i struggle to imagine that someone would fearkill a new person over reads, but i don't have a compelling alternative explanation
Reiterating that damo's representation of SF's reads is dishonest. He was anti Dip and darg.
He was anti red and you in his p9 readlist. I agree he softened on you, did he soften on red?

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

#545 Post by Jamiet99uk » Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:42 pm

damo666 wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:37 pm
ghug wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:13 pm
Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:33 pm

i struggle to imagine that someone would fearkill a new person over reads, but i don't have a compelling alternative explanation
Reiterating that damo's representation of SF's reads is dishonest. He was anti Dip and darg.
He was anti red and you in his p9 readlist. I agree he softened on you, did he soften on red?
A p9 readlist isn't really going to inspire a fear kill surely? The phase ended on p17.
Potato, potato; potato.

Red Neurax
Posts: 259
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2024 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

#546 Post by Red Neurax » Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:43 pm

damo666 wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:37 pm
ghug wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:13 pm
Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:33 pm

i struggle to imagine that someone would fearkill a new person over reads, but i don't have a compelling alternative explanation
Reiterating that damo's representation of SF's reads is dishonest. He was anti Dip and darg.
He was anti red and you in his p9 readlist. I agree he softened on you, did he soften on red?
i think he did because he did not vote me

User avatar
DiplomacyandWarfare
Posts: 1951
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2024 12:19 am
Location: Where you least expect me to be
Contact:

Re: M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

#547 Post by DiplomacyandWarfare » Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:51 pm

%%vote darg
for, among other things, faking an "accidental" vote on me
Pronouns: he/him

"Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock."
-Will Rogers

User avatar
DiplomacyandWarfare
Posts: 1951
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2024 12:19 am
Location: Where you least expect me to be
Contact:

Re: M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

#548 Post by DiplomacyandWarfare » Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:54 pm

dargorygel wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:44 am
DiplomacyandWarfare wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:26 am
Why am I being held responsible for this vote?
I wanted a vote based on the %%
I did not ask for you guys to start random bandwagons
I did not ask for darg to start a bandwagon on food
I did not ask for red to tie and leave me under 5 minutes to make a decision

and frankly, I am starting to consider a jamie/darg team because they are making a very concentrated effort to pin yesterday's vote on me
The only vote being "pinned" on you is your own. Do you not see the inconsistent nature of your vote?
Well, I see that to a very limited extent it was inconsistent with my earlier readlist
and I will yet again remind you that I did not have sufficient time to consider this.
Pronouns: he/him

"Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock."
-Will Rogers

User avatar
DiplomacyandWarfare
Posts: 1951
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2024 12:19 am
Location: Where you least expect me to be
Contact:

Re: M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

#549 Post by DiplomacyandWarfare » Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:58 pm

dargorygel wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:42 pm
DiplomacyandWarfare wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:34 pm
dargorygel wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 5:00 am


Umsy umsy... I did.not thonk, write, or say that you said that what I said was fake.

From the pov from which I view this gameworld, dip accused me of fakery.
Yes, that is correct. I accuse you of faking a "mistake" vote at the start of the day.
Yes, that is clear. What is the scum value of that play?
A: Bandwagon effect on me, especially with the one-vote limit

B: Clears (most of) the suspicion of you when I die (relative to not claiming it was accidental), because clearly you didn't mean to make a permanent vote on me

C: Also clears you from vote-related suspicion if If I don't die because then you voted for someone who was not the flip, and moreover, you clearly accidentally voted
Ci: except if your teammate was the flip, in which case you would look quite suspicious
Pronouns: he/him

"Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock."
-Will Rogers

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 20726
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

#550 Post by ghug » Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:02 pm

damo666 wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:37 pm
ghug wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:13 pm
Bonatogether wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:33 pm

i struggle to imagine that someone would fearkill a new person over reads, but i don't have a compelling alternative explanation
Reiterating that damo's representation of SF's reads is dishonest. He was anti Dip and darg.
He was anti red and you in his p9 readlist. I agree he softened on you, did he soften on red?
Not that I see, but the last reads he stated were suspicion of darg and dip. It's unclear to me why you'd weight something from page 9 over that if you were legitimately trying to find information.

User avatar
DiplomacyandWarfare
Posts: 1951
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2024 12:19 am
Location: Where you least expect me to be
Contact:

Re: M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

#551 Post by DiplomacyandWarfare » Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:03 pm

ghug wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 5:26 pm
DiplomacyandWarfare wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:59 am
oh btw
I had an entire case arguing for a jamie/straight scumteam based on a potential soft jamie made d1
didn't want to post it d1 because I wanted to see if straight followed jamie's vote d1 and by the time straight voted it was too late to get any sort of vote going
I was going to post it like 30 seconds before EoN as I do but then I missed EoN
would anyone like to see it?
Yes
Pronouns: he/him

"Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock."
-Will Rogers

User avatar
DiplomacyandWarfare
Posts: 1951
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2024 12:19 am
Location: Where you least expect me to be
Contact:

Re: The "follow" soft

#552 Post by DiplomacyandWarfare » Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:04 pm

The "follow" soft
---
To be released at the end of n1, or at EoD (or one end-vote away from hammer) if I am the top wagon
---
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:26 am
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:23 am
Hello, follow persons.
* fellow
Here we see jamiet post "follow" persons and then correct the typo. Correcting it makes it look like less of a soft, but my theory is that jamiet is softing to his teammate to "follow" his vote

To "soft" my suspicion about this, I have elected to post the following:
DiplomacyandWarfare wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:29 am
civbsmcfoczlvnxlbcxbobcxwbcxbnxzntczcxyzcbzpbcxzobcxzb


?
Looking at this, you might notice an absurd about of the letters 'c', 'x', 'b', and 'z'. What do all of these letters have in common?
Answer: They are on the bottom row of a keyboard
so what about the letters that aren't on the bottom row of a keyboard?
civbsmcfoczlvnxlbcxbobcxwbcxbnxzntczcxyzcbzpbcxzobcxzb
isfollowtypo

Now I wait and hope someone sheeps jamie for dubious reasons. If so, they are potentially on a scumteam with jamie
---
UPDATE
I sincerely hope I'm right about this
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2025 11:47 am
I'm caught up.

Dip&War looks a bit shady.

Ghug is very low intensity, he normally has more to say on D1.

Bona spaffing his vote early without reading the setup is NAI.

Damo calling on me to post more when he's said almost nothing is slightly suspect.

I like the "Vote only once" mechanic, it's an interesting new dynamic.

%%Vote Diplo

Those are my comments so far.
jamie places a vote
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:48 pm
damo666 wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:16 pm
for a bozo type survey can we all

%%vote NAME please

%%vote ghug
I did already but

%%Vote Dip & War
jamie feels the need to remind us that he put a very obvious, very sheep-able vote out


and then this happened
StraightFlush wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2025 11:14 pm
I have decided that I like Jamie for now.

%%vote Dip
...
like, seriously, is there any more convincing post straight could have made to prove my point?
tring jamie AND voting me?
this is... drastic
change of plans
if straight sheeps jamie's (real) vote as well, I'm posting this early
---
Pronouns: he/him

"Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock."
-Will Rogers

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 20726
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: The "follow" soft

#553 Post by ghug » Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:10 pm

DiplomacyandWarfare wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:04 pm
The "follow" soft
---
To be released at the end of n1, or at EoD (or one end-vote away from hammer) if I am the top wagon
---
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:26 am
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:23 am
Hello, follow persons.
* fellow
Here we see jamiet post "follow" persons and then correct the typo. Correcting it makes it look like less of a soft, but my theory is that jamiet is softing to his teammate to "follow" his vote

To "soft" my suspicion about this, I have elected to post the following:
DiplomacyandWarfare wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:29 am
civbsmcfoczlvnxlbcxbobcxwbcxbnxzntczcxyzcbzpbcxzobcxzb


?
Looking at this, you might notice an absurd about of the letters 'c', 'x', 'b', and 'z'. What do all of these letters have in common?
Answer: They are on the bottom row of a keyboard
so what about the letters that aren't on the bottom row of a keyboard?
civbsmcfoczlvnxlbcxbobcxwbcxbnxzntczcxyzcbzpbcxzobcxzb
isfollowtypo

Now I wait and hope someone sheeps jamie for dubious reasons. If so, they are potentially on a scumteam with jamie
---
UPDATE
I sincerely hope I'm right about this
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2025 11:47 am
I'm caught up.

Dip&War looks a bit shady.

Ghug is very low intensity, he normally has more to say on D1.

Bona spaffing his vote early without reading the setup is NAI.

Damo calling on me to post more when he's said almost nothing is slightly suspect.

I like the "Vote only once" mechanic, it's an interesting new dynamic.

%%Vote Diplo

Those are my comments so far.
jamie places a vote
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:48 pm
damo666 wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2025 6:16 pm
for a bozo type survey can we all

%%vote NAME please

%%vote ghug
I did already but

%%Vote Dip & War
jamie feels the need to remind us that he put a very obvious, very sheep-able vote out


and then this happened
StraightFlush wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2025 11:14 pm
I have decided that I like Jamie for now.

%%vote Dip
...
like, seriously, is there any more convincing post straight could have made to prove my point?
tring jamie AND voting me?
this is... drastic
change of plans
if straight sheeps jamie's (real) vote as well, I'm posting this early
---
You guys really think this is scum?

damo666
Posts: 20268
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

#554 Post by damo666 » Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:10 pm

ghug wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:02 pm
damo666 wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:37 pm
ghug wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:13 pm


Reiterating that damo's representation of SF's reads is dishonest. He was anti Dip and darg.
He was anti red and you in his p9 readlist. I agree he softened on you, did he soften on red?
Not that I see, but the last reads he stated were suspicion of darg and dip. It's unclear to me why you'd weight something from page 9 over that if you were legitimately trying to find information.
laziness, incompetence

damo666
Posts: 20268
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

#555 Post by damo666 » Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:18 pm

Hmmm that does make Dip look townie.

Now can all food voters have been town (implying [to me] a {Bona,red,Jamie} scumpool)? I think that doubtful. Therefore (at least) one of ghug and darg must be scum. Now would scumghug defend towndip like he has?

I now thing darg is our best option.

User avatar
DiplomacyandWarfare
Posts: 1951
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2024 12:19 am
Location: Where you least expect me to be
Contact:

Re: M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

#556 Post by DiplomacyandWarfare » Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:27 pm

%%votecount
darg 3 (dip, damo, ghug)
dip 1 (jamie)
Pronouns: he/him

"Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock."
-Will Rogers

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

#557 Post by Jamiet99uk » Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:54 pm

DiplomacyandWarfare wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:27 pm
%%votecount
darg 3 (dip, damo, ghug)
dip 1 (jamie)
Why are you discounting Darg's *actual* vote?

There are two on you.
Potato, potato; potato.

User avatar
dargorygel
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7168
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
Location: Over the rainbow
Contact:

Re: M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

#558 Post by dargorygel » Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:54 pm

DiplomacyandWarfare wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:27 pm
%%votecount
darg 3 (dip, damo, ghug)
dip 1 (jamie)
Well, you have two on you, dip.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33938
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

#559 Post by Jamiet99uk » Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:55 pm

damo666 wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:18 pm
Hmmm that does make Dip look townie.

Now can all food voters have been town (implying [to me] a {Bona,red,Jamie} scumpool)? I think that doubtful. Therefore (at least) one of ghug and darg must be scum. Now would scumghug defend towndip like he has?

I now thing darg is our best option.
I feel an urge to flip Dip or Ghug to validate my theory.
Potato, potato; potato.

User avatar
dargorygel
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7168
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
Location: Over the rainbow
Contact:

Re: M1034: SOLE SURVIVOR: GAME THREAD

#560 Post by dargorygel » Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:55 pm

It is dip and ghug.

I don't mind dying to prove it.

We can afford this misskill.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hominidae