Mafia 1033 - The Next Generation [Hidden]

[Bonatogether]

Its not a specific post that makes Dip or Drag towny its the fact that for Dip basically all his posts are matter of fact and straight to the point which is town-Dip and Darg has been consistently solving throughout the entire game

So i mean i can link the bot for u to iso if you really dont believe my word

are you nuts? i just wrote a whole case about how DaW does NOT produce anything that is matter of fact, and that it's all just smoke and mirrors. YOU just said it was a reasonable case. get your story straight

And the one point i disagree with is that Dip sheeped without reason and voted without purpose. I think he has not done that

I thought the case was *fine*

that was the summary. you can't agree with the longform and disagree with the summary

[Bonatogether]

can anyone here tell me with a straight face that we're killing a guy with four posts over DaW

[damo666]

ok guys i looked at wagons and this is incredibly disappointing

Why? Would you prefer to be the flip?

[damo666]

can anyone here tell me with a straight face that we're killing a guy with four posts over DaW

Let's see if argent comes on

[ghug]

is anyone going to respond to the case i wrote

darg thinking it was about will doesn't count

One thing I noticed you said about DiplomacyandWarfare is that "It's notable that he would briefly switch to rdr but would leave that wagon to return to voting me, even as rdr's wagon ran away to a bajillion votes."

However, DiplomacyandWarfare did move his vote back to rdrivera after Just voted for rdrivera. What do you think DiplomacyandWarfare was trying to do with his vote moves?

I think he was being honest when he said that he was voting at least in part to survive, but he also was clearly working towards wagoning me - the first time he voted rdr, he was leaving my wagon at 3 votes (so both of his preferred wagons were the only ones above a single vote), and he also returned to voting me because the 'rdr wagon doesn't seem to be going anywhere' (read: he picked up an additional vote).

i think every one of his vote moves in eod1 can be explained by it being preceded by someone voting for him (second vote for me, second vote for rdr)

How do you reconcile this with the fact that he refused to vote for you when it came down to it?

[ghug]

jamie if we kill DaW today I'll join you on will tomorrow

Grossss

[ghug]

bozo, argent, ghug, darg, vecna all need to get on the wagons

Grosssssss

[Jamiet99uk]

I got up at 5.30am to catch the 6.15am train and now it's 10:30pm my time and I've barely stopped.

I was in one face-to-face meeting today which lasted from 9.30am until 6.15pm. One fucking meeting. That long. Think about what that is like. This is my working life about 40% of the time in 2024.

I'm almost passing out from mental and physical exhaustion. I might not stay up til EoD.

[Jamiet99uk]

I want to answer the question of D'n'Dubya.

##Vote Diplomacy&Wolverine.

[damo666]

I want to answer the question of D'n'Dubya.

##Vote Diplomacy&Wolverine.

yawn ##vote Dip

[Jamiet99uk]

My townreads are Bona and Red Neurax.

Vecna maybe but he's playing like shit.
JustWill maybe now that he showed up again.

[DiplomacyandWarfare]

hi im back

[Jamiet99uk]

hi im back

Hi back, I'm Jamie.

[Bonatogether]

One thing I noticed you said about DiplomacyandWarfare is that "It's notable that he would briefly switch to rdr but would leave that wagon to return to voting me, even as rdr's wagon ran away to a bajillion votes."

However, DiplomacyandWarfare did move his vote back to rdrivera after Just voted for rdrivera. What do you think DiplomacyandWarfare was trying to do with his vote moves?

I think he was being honest when he said that he was voting at least in part to survive, but he also was clearly working towards wagoning me - the first time he voted rdr, he was leaving my wagon at 3 votes (so both of his preferred wagons were the only ones above a single vote), and he also returned to voting me because the 'rdr wagon doesn't seem to be going anywhere' (read: he picked up an additional vote).

i think every one of his vote moves in eod1 can be explained by it being preceded by someone voting for him (second vote for me, second vote for rdr)

How do you reconcile this with the fact that he refused to vote for you when it came down to it?

my wagon didn't have momentum + rdr was going up

[DiplomacyandWarfare]

One thing I noticed you said about DiplomacyandWarfare is that "It's notable that he would briefly switch to rdr but would leave that wagon to return to voting me, even as rdr's wagon ran away to a bajillion votes."

However, DiplomacyandWarfare did move his vote back to rdrivera after Just voted for rdrivera. What do you think DiplomacyandWarfare was trying to do with his vote moves?

I think he was being honest when he said that he was voting at least in part to survive, but he also was clearly working towards wagoning me - the first time he voted rdr, he was leaving my wagon at 3 votes (so both of his preferred wagons were the only ones above a single vote), and he also returned to voting me because the 'rdr wagon doesn't seem to be going anywhere' (read: he picked up an additional vote).

i think every one of his vote moves in eod1 can be explained by it being preceded by someone voting for him (second vote for me, second vote for rdr)

How do you reconcile this with the fact that he refused to vote for you when it came down to it?

one of my favorite things about what you guys are doing is that you avoid saying names, because you don't want to imply anyone might be paired with me. Keeps you neutral, helps you move to any wagon you want tomorrow

[Bonatogether]

I think he was being honest when he said that he was voting at least in part to survive, but he also was clearly working towards wagoning me - the first time he voted rdr, he was leaving my wagon at 3 votes (so both of his preferred wagons were the only ones above a single vote), and he also returned to voting me because the 'rdr wagon doesn't seem to be going anywhere' (read: he picked up an additional vote).

i think every one of his vote moves in eod1 can be explained by it being preceded by someone voting for him (second vote for me, second vote for rdr)

How do you reconcile this with the fact that he refused to vote for you when it came down to it?

one of my favorite things about what you guys are doing is that you avoid saying names, because you don't want to imply anyone might be paired with me. Keeps you neutral, helps you move to any wagon you want tomorrow

let's be honest here, i've clearly stated and restated that i think some combination of you, darg, and will are likely scum

[ghug]

Bona has looked better as the day went on. Less sparky. I think scumbona would have stayed sarcastic.

Argent is a newbie, who i don't know. I've read the case on him. But was not overly moved.

If I have to choose, I'll go argent atm.

I disagree with this assessment. I think scum bona is more inclined to acquiesce and try to look good, while town bins would be more stubborn.

[Jamiet99uk]

I think he was being honest when he said that he was voting at least in part to survive, but he also was clearly working towards wagoning me - the first time he voted rdr, he was leaving my wagon at 3 votes (so both of his preferred wagons were the only ones above a single vote), and he also returned to voting me because the 'rdr wagon doesn't seem to be going anywhere' (read: he picked up an additional vote).

i think every one of his vote moves in eod1 can be explained by it being preceded by someone voting for him (second vote for me, second vote for rdr)

How do you reconcile this with the fact that he refused to vote for you when it came down to it?

one of my favorite things about what you guys are doing is that you avoid saying names, because you don't want to imply anyone might be paired with me. Keeps you neutral, helps you move to any wagon you want tomorrow

I think either Damo or Bozo is one of your partners, for the record.

[Bonatogether]

@DaW you haven't engaged with my case at all

[ghug]

I think he was being honest when he said that he was voting at least in part to survive, but he also was clearly working towards wagoning me - the first time he voted rdr, he was leaving my wagon at 3 votes (so both of his preferred wagons were the only ones above a single vote), and he also returned to voting me because the 'rdr wagon doesn't seem to be going anywhere' (read: he picked up an additional vote).

i think every one of his vote moves in eod1 can be explained by it being preceded by someone voting for him (second vote for me, second vote for rdr)

How do you reconcile this with the fact that he refused to vote for you when it came down to it?

my wagon didn't have momentum + rdr was going up

That happened later. He could have tied it with a vote on you.