Mafia 1033 - The Next Generation [Hidden]

[bozotheclown]

you guys are adorable when you talk about me

Do you do what BunnyGo does and have certain words in the thread trigger an alert?

[Vecna]

i wasnt quite sure how the game worked and the most recent post was by dip saying something about voting me and fair so i just thought he was accusing me

had to actually look this one up. For some reason the only thing I felt like digging into in this game so far because im intrigued by our new buddy.

It sort of checks out in a very weak way.

Jamiet's vote on me is apparently because I have apparently been lurking. Fair.
Foodcoat's vote on Red is based on lurking. Fair
ghug... still has a joke vote out???
dargogrygel thinks there's a ghug/bona connection, which I am skeptical of because I tr ghug
damo... claims to have solved d1???
Bonatogether also has a joke vote out
wait
the two people who dargorygel thinks are linked have both kept out early joke votes and made low-quality, 1-2 sentence posts.
##vote bonatogether

this does not smell like scum reasoning to me. odd as it might be.

OK, but that post by DiplomacyandWarfare points out that foodcoats was voting for Red Neurax, yet Red Neurax came away from that thinking DiplomacyandWarfare is the one who was suspicious for trying to get him DKed.

the reasoning I read into it was; this guy is approving of this other guy voting me. thats suspicious.

its not made very explicit, but its the thread of thought I think he wants to convey.

@red; is that a fair interpretation?

[Vecna]

you guys are adorable when you talk about me

Do you do what BunnyGo does and have certain words in the thread trigger an alert?

is this a serious question? or just some weak attempt to make me look bad?

Maybe you should do your statistics and look at the usual distribution of when im generally active. see if theres a more obvious explenation there honey boo-boo.

[bozotheclown]

had to actually look this one up. For some reason the only thing I felt like digging into in this game so far because im intrigued by our new buddy.

It sort of checks out in a very weak way.




this does not smell like scum reasoning to me. odd as it might be.

OK, but that post by DiplomacyandWarfare points out that foodcoats was voting for Red Neurax, yet Red Neurax came away from that thinking DiplomacyandWarfare is the one who was suspicious for trying to get him DKed.

the reasoning I read into it was; this guy is approving of this other guy voting me. thats suspicious.

its not made very explicit, but its the thread of thought I think he wants to convey.

@red; is that a fair interpretation?

I have asked Red Neurax about it and he hasn't addressed it, so I don't know if that is how he meant it.

[bozotheclown]

you guys are adorable when you talk about me

Do you do what BunnyGo does and have certain words in the thread trigger an alert?

is this a serious question? or just some weak attempt to make me look bad?

Maybe you should do your statistics and look at the usual distribution of when im generally active. see if theres a more obvious explenation there honey boo-boo.

It was a serious question. In the last game I played BunnyGo specified key words to use to alert him to something happening in the game.

[ghug]

had to actually look this one up. For some reason the only thing I felt like digging into in this game so far because im intrigued by our new buddy.

It sort of checks out in a very weak way.




this does not smell like scum reasoning to me. odd as it might be.

OK, but that post by DiplomacyandWarfare points out that foodcoats was voting for Red Neurax, yet Red Neurax came away from that thinking DiplomacyandWarfare is the one who was suspicious for trying to get him DKed.

the reasoning I read into it was; this guy is approving of this other guy voting me. thats suspicious.

its not made very explicit, but its the thread of thought I think he wants to convey.

@red; is that a fair interpretation?

It's OMGUS, but given his stated AmOMG US experience I feel like it's plausible that that's just how he plays this sort of game regardless of alignment.. I'm not seeing anything I couldn't imagine coming from a scum perspective.

[Vecna]

thats a pretty hard to decipher response.

Did you seriously try to kill me d1 or was it just to see who would take the bait?

[Vecna]

for all those complainers about my activity, feel free to interact with me now that im actually here

[DiplomacyandWarfare]

what is the main reasoning for voting diplomacyandwarfare?
just curious

My initial suspicion was that his whole Doctor Who thing was a bit fake, but now my feelings come down to the EoD wagonomics I posted earlier (which you acknowledged). It looks to me like several people were desperate to motivate other wagons at EoD when D&W was a serious contender to be chopped.

Ah yes, the "roleplaying as doctor who is "fake"" excuse. Gotta love it.

[Vecna]

##vote argent

[DiplomacyandWarfare]

@dip and @bozo

Haven't you seen Jamie do the 'emphasis vote' before? What was suspicious about it this time?

I don't remember seeing Jamie do this before, but I haven't been analyzing the bot vote info as much before this game.

And particularly @dip, you stated that on other sites you find this anti-town... can you 'splain?

...Didn't I already do this?
It makes the vote appear to be more popular than it already is
you know, bandwagon effect
pushes people to go to that vote
(jamie literally admitted that he wanted to cause a bandwagon on me by doing this)

which sounds fine but it obsufucates the real info about who the bandwagons are on. Aside from the issues of bandwagoning itself (which this behavior encourages), it hides information about who people are actually currently voting for.

It is especially anti-town with 2 newbies here.

[DiplomacyandWarfare]

And, while aware of RL stuff for most people... the room's quiet concerns me. It makes a tickle in the back of my brain that says, "none of these are scummies, so they do not feel threatened."

Alternate theory: all three people on me are scum.
(for people re-reading this later: bona, damo, jamiet)
the other potential teamsolve I have at this stage is bona-damo-red

[DiplomacyandWarfare]

what is the main reasoning for voting diplomacyandwarfare?
just curious

My initial suspicion was that his whole Doctor Who thing was a bit fake, but now my feelings come down to the EoD wagonomics I posted earlier (which you acknowledged). It looks to me like several people were desperate to motivate other wagons at EoD when D&W was a serious contender to be chopped.

jimathon knows what's up

is "what's up" the entire scumteam creatively ignoring that the other big wagon was bona?

[DiplomacyandWarfare]

I do not object to this vote.

Me neither, wanna join me?

I will if who does.

those of us who are town don't leave the wagons of those we know are scum to vote random other wagons, nor do we try to pressure others into doing the same.

[DiplomacyandWarfare]

had to actually look this one up. For some reason the only thing I felt like digging into in this game so far because im intrigued by our new buddy.

It sort of checks out in a very weak way.




this does not smell like scum reasoning to me. odd as it might be.

OK, but that post by DiplomacyandWarfare points out that foodcoats was voting for Red Neurax, yet Red Neurax came away from that thinking DiplomacyandWarfare is the one who was suspicious for trying to get him DKed.

the reasoning I read into it was; this guy is approving of this other guy voting me. thats suspicious.

its not made very explicit, but its the thread of thought I think he wants to convey.

@red; is that a fair interpretation?

I was, in fact, indicating moderate approval of the vote

[DiplomacyandWarfare]

This vote is going slow and there are mafia on me, so votes going off me are unlikely. Time to stir the pot and join a different counterwagon
##vote bona

[argent]

Hi Argent!
Can you expand on this accusation a little? Does being wrong often coincide with being scum in your experience?

considering the fact that dip is defending will, and dip's likely scum, then will's probably there too
and being wrong makes you more likely to be scum than being right

Can you expand on the last point?

In general, although scum have more information about the game and can draw better conclusions, they benefit from misdirection. In any case, I have been voted for, so I must countervote out of spite.

##vote vecna

[ghug]

considering the fact that dip is defending will, and dip's likely scum, then will's probably there too
and being wrong makes you more likely to be scum than being right

Can you expand on the last point?

In general, although scum have more information about the game and can draw better conclusions, they benefit from misdirection. In any case, I have been voted for, so I must countervote out of spite.

##vote vecna

Hmm

[dargorygel]

Can you expand on the last point?

In general, although scum have more information about the game and can draw better conclusions, they benefit from misdirection. In any case, I have been voted for, so I must countervote out of spite.

##vote vecna

Hmm

Hmmm

[Red Neurax]

isnt the day supposed to end