oh yeah? Lets have a special focussed look at that:Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 12:32 pmIt's what you said in the first paragraph of your post.
see the red marked word, which explicitly proofs that your interpretation is totally wrong. It was never 100% of my argument, and it from the wording you can't even be sure that it is a reason for why I'm doing it; no, I just mentioned that has the ability to emphasis a vote already taken. Which is absolutely NOT the 'only endvote for emphasis' as you want to present it.first of all, as a long standing member of this community, you must be aware that endvoting does also have an emphasis of on the vote already taken, as a way to 'up the ante', if you excuse my poker-ish.
this is either malicious misrepresentation or a big reading comprehension mistake. And as I know you are pretty good at the latter as a learned lawman, the first situation is looking much more likely here.
what I wanted to see was your (and others) REACTION to my statement; to see if anyone agrees/disagrees, why, when and how. If anyone had even the thought about it, or if anyone would point out other things that get more obvious when you think more about the situation; I'm currently deep in my "throw shit at the wall and see what sticks" phase, and I don't like what I see in your direction.
In any case, the second part is more important. You want me to believe that you had a plan to cause a quick-hammer in order to end the day very early and prevent Mafia from getting a shot? Seriously??
Well I don't believe that claim because your actions around the time of your endvote do not in any way suggest you were actually seeking to achieve that outcome.
Will that get me voted out? Maybe. But at least I've done a part in trying to get information and see who is sus and who not.