Yes, my reads have been flawed, and everything needs a new light, but there is something we have with the Flavius flip. Here is what I opined about Chaqa-Damo as a pairing based on votes N3.
Here I took a look at both Chaqa-WillKak and Chaqa-King. The Flavius and Dip assessments were removed for obvious reasons.Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Fri Aug 16, 2024 7:50 pmAt first blush, I have to say the D3 of Chaqa and Damo suggests a decent pairing possibility.
As a voting blok, they were both on confirmed D1, uncertain about D2 since Flavius is unclear. Now D3, with both yoyo and I town, does mafia!chaqa get on that King vote to ensure a miskill?
I think what worries me is how quickly I seem to dismiss the possibility of the King as mafia partner theme. Something about my bias clouding my objectivity?Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Fri Aug 16, 2024 8:06 pm
For Chaqa - WillKak we have a repeat of the Chaqa-Dip positioning but somewhat differently. D1 both are on different confirmed town. On D2 Chaqa is on conftown as is WillKak. On D3 a little less clear since Chaqa is on an unclear while WillKak is on me.
Finally the Chaqa-King pairing. King votes Chaqa on D1 which could be a nice easy bus since there's no momentum on Chaqa. Chaqa is on conftown. D2 has chaqa on conftown while King's vote is on a nonclear. D3 King has a vote on no one. I see this pairing as the least likely; mafia do know that they want the miskills and I believe that they will probably let town lead the wagons since they will probably be miskills they don't have to take responsibility for. As mafia, King's vote could have been very important. I think pairing doesn't work. It does cause me to consider King more town than not.
As a hierarchy of most to least mafia pairings, I think I have:
Chaqa-Damo, Chaqa-WillKak, Chaqa-Dip, Chaqa-Flavius, Chaqa-King.