WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33937
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
Brian you appear to be only reacting to Flavius and unaware of anyone else posting, what gives?
Potato, potato; potato.
-
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
Um, Will...if you're going to jump for some low-hanging fruit, make sure it's fruit you're grabbing and not a poo-ball stuck up in a tree.JustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 12:40 amRip jamieh it didnt say that in the setup
Time to die jambo
##vote jamie
From the doc:
Gambler Power:
Each night must place 2 bets. Can choose to make a bet public. Public bets will be announced at the beginning of day.
NOTE: Gambler may send 1 bet to GM before game start. Gambler is allowed to target themself. Each night phase they must place 2 bets.
I don't scumread you for not knowing. I do somewhat scumread you for the exuberance with which you went for it.
-
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
Hot!Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 12:41 amMy Role PM didn't say anything about the Gambler, it only spoke about my amazing body.Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 12:39 amWas that really where you read it? Or was that in your PM from Sweet?
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
To be fair, he's been getting you to give us all a lot of reactions...Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 1:08 amCan anyone else validate my thinking here?
Will has outright said that he tried to set a reaction test trap for me, based on knowing that the Gambler's Role PM was different to the Gambler rules described in the Setup Document.
How can anyone know there would be a difference between those two things UNLESS THEY ARE SCUM?
The moral of the boy who cried wolf? Never tell the same lie twice--Elim Garak
Take a minute of your day to be nice to someone, you dumb son of a bitch -- Iron Sheik
Take a minute of your day to be nice to someone, you dumb son of a bitch -- Iron Sheik
-
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
I am catching up and responding as I go along. If you look I have replied to Dip, Bunny, Flavius. Probably had a quip or a notable about you. Just reading, asking questions. Just now saw your exchange with Will. I'll get to that at some point tonight I hope.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 1:21 amBrian you appear to be only reacting to Flavius and unaware of anyone else posting, what gives?
- JustAGuyNamedWill
- Posts: 6604
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
- Location: Just some town
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
Means I’ve been playing p bad the last few gamesHamilton Brian wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 1:20 amI don't understand this phrase. What are you trying to say here?JustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 12:31 am
In response to Ham: as someone who is routinely skill issuing as town i do actually think i need meta to be townread. It is very rare not for me to be in contention for a D1
- JustAGuyNamedWill
- Posts: 6604
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
- Location: Just some town
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
No Jamie I’m not saying thatJamiet99uk wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 1:03 amWhy do you think those two things would be different??JustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 1:00 amNo no Jamie you’re misunderstandingJamiet99uk wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 12:57 am
Huh?
Do you have a reason for thinking that the Gambler's Role PM is different from the way it is written in the setup?
What is that reason?
I don’t think you’re someone who doesn’t understand a setup
I was trying to check if the way you learned the gambler powers was from reading your role pm or by remembering the setup
If I was the Gambler (which I'm not), why do you think my role PM and the setup would differ?
This only makes sense if you have seen the Gambler role PM and I think you might be the Gambler.
I’m saying that they more than likely give the exact same info. So as scum you would not read the setup for details on your role
I am not saying I think they are different. I dunno if it is or isn’t but my assumption is that it’s the same
- kingofthepirates
- Posts: 1553
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2023 11:34 pm
- Location: Dragon Temple, Crumbling Farum Azula, The Lands Between
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
*yawn* good morning. oh! flavius is here! hurrah! I don't like the 6 pages of silence thing, and agree with hb, at least drop a greeting 
I think will's rt was a bit wack (and maybe this is just my lack of understand about the game, but the crumb was placed awkwardly), and jamie's response is fine. slight scum points for will in my book. NIA jamie's response. I do think Jamie's defense of haze is rather out of the blue though, which is slightly scummy. Not enough for me to jump to voting them though.
haven't noticed any particular issues yet. ##unvote since flav came back. chaqa seems to still be flying under the radar, surprisingly. ##vote chaqa. let's see if we can squeeze anything out of this...
currently most inclined to keep the vote on chaqa (reasoning hasn't changed). haze is a fine secondary target in my book, I agree that their posts seem to be lacking in substance with only 1 read and they're pretty passive on the solving side (not really pushing questions/grilling anyone for their responses).

I think will's rt was a bit wack (and maybe this is just my lack of understand about the game, but the crumb was placed awkwardly), and jamie's response is fine. slight scum points for will in my book. NIA jamie's response. I do think Jamie's defense of haze is rather out of the blue though, which is slightly scummy. Not enough for me to jump to voting them though.
haven't noticed any particular issues yet. ##unvote since flav came back. chaqa seems to still be flying under the radar, surprisingly. ##vote chaqa. let's see if we can squeeze anything out of this...
currently most inclined to keep the vote on chaqa (reasoning hasn't changed). haze is a fine secondary target in my book, I agree that their posts seem to be lacking in substance with only 1 read and they're pretty passive on the solving side (not really pushing questions/grilling anyone for their responses).
As astra per amorem
- Haze with a Z
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
I assumed at this point that B is made up by brain to push you when you are town tbh so now your lazy low effort posts feel scummy tbh.DiplomacyandWarfare wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:25 pmA: Haven't gotten to it yetHaze with a Z wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:04 pmWhy no long setup analysis post this game?DiplomacyandWarfare wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 1:30 pmImmediate readlist that I composed in 10 seconds.
Disclaimer: This may not reflect my reads in the future, and I cannot write a 1k word post about each of these reads (except DipandWar cause they're so towny)
Town
DipandWar
BunnyGo
Damo
Ghug
Null line = Everyone Else
Jamiet
Chaqa
B: Apparently I post long posts when I'm scum.
- Haze with a Z
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
I agree although this seems more like a strategy to protect yourself from only having 15 posts than a strategy to try to limit the gambler’s post count which felt like the original goal.DiplomacyandWarfare wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:30 pmWell that's an entirely different pointHaze with a Z wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:07 pmLike posting at 120 posts is more risky than 200 based on what it sounds like you are saying
but sure
anyways im trying to post a lot (>100 posts per day (NOT out of game day))
that seems like a decent strategy given the mech
agreed?
- Haze with a Z
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
I’m kinda disappointed that the two people I’d put my vote on first are voting me. Which makes sense but I wasn’t expecting it tbh.
- Haze with a Z
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
I’m failing to see the purpose of the gambler making this bet though.DiplomacyandWarfare wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:32 pmThe gambler is the target?Haze with a Z wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:17 pm##call gm
Hi this may be a really stupid question but if the gambler bets on themself how would that interact with the target?
It's fairly obvious how this ends up working
for example, if the gambler bets on themself voting for someone, their vote won't work if they vote for that person, and it also won't work if they vote for someone else
- Haze with a Z
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
Like why would the gambler give themselves net negative consequences?
- Haze with a Z
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
I’ve literally done more than you smhDiplomacyandWarfare wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:46 pmI will also ##vote haze because I feel that they have posted a lot and contributed nothing.BunnyGo wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:34 pmI think you're right about ##vote HazeDiplomacyandWarfare wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:32 pm
The gambler is the target?
It's fairly obvious how this ends up working
for example, if the gambler bets on themself voting for someone, their vote won't work if they vote for that person, and it also won't work if they vote for someone else
- Haze with a Z
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
Like I could spend 10 seconds throwing names at a wall and have a crappy conclusion but it would be more than what you did tbh
- Haze with a Z
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
So you wanna explain what I’m supposed to be talking about? I’m not even directly sring you here and instead saying that it should be nai unlike the other person saying scum would hide it and instead you decide my conclusion is the worst out of the three because I simply don’t think that someone would read something more carefully just because they are scum?JustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 7:06 pm##VOTE HAZE scumboHaze with a Z wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:12 pmI don’t even Know what we are talking about noticing tbh but I just think if someone won’t notice something as town they won’t notice it as scum tbh.
- Haze with a Z
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
Like imo your conclusion on me from what you’ve said makes no sense unless the point I’m arguing makes no sense with whatever post we were talking about tbh
- Haze with a Z
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
Ok yeah so what I’m reading is that it’s stupid for gambler to bet on themself because it’s a lose lose for them either waysweetandcool wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 7:09 pmNah, it's a fine question.Haze with a Z wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:17 pm##call gm
Hi this may be a really stupid question but if the gambler bets on themself how would that interact with the target?
I see no problem following the document. If a Gambler bets on themselves and succeeds then they will earn that effect. If they manage to fail, then they earn that effect.
- Haze with a Z
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
Prob not good to discuss that though tbh so I’ll try to shut up about that now
- Haze with a Z
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round
Ok yeah I see no point in town not calling someone town if they notice something. This being said I don’t notice anything so it is clearly not super obvious or I’d be able to understand itJustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 7:10 pmOh this
To be honest i just saw my name bc im vain like that and sort of disregarded it
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, brainbomb