WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33937
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#361 Post by Jamiet99uk » Fri Aug 09, 2024 1:21 am

Brian you appear to be only reacting to Flavius and unaware of anyone else posting, what gives?
Potato, potato; potato.

Hamilton Brian
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 5367
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#362 Post by Hamilton Brian » Fri Aug 09, 2024 1:23 am

JustAGuyNamedWill wrote:
Fri Aug 09, 2024 12:40 am
Rip jamieh it didnt say that in the setup
Time to die jambo

##vote jamie
Um, Will...if you're going to jump for some low-hanging fruit, make sure it's fruit you're grabbing and not a poo-ball stuck up in a tree.

From the doc:

Gambler Power:

Each night must place 2 bets. Can choose to make a bet public. Public bets will be announced at the beginning of day.

NOTE: Gambler may send 1 bet to GM before game start. Gambler is allowed to target themself. Each night phase they must place 2 bets.


I don't scumread you for not knowing. I do somewhat scumread you for the exuberance with which you went for it.

Hamilton Brian
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 5367
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#363 Post by Hamilton Brian » Fri Aug 09, 2024 1:24 am

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Aug 09, 2024 12:41 am
Hamilton Brian wrote:
Fri Aug 09, 2024 12:39 am
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:12 pm


The Setup Doc says the Gambler gets a pre-game bet.
Was that really where you read it? Or was that in your PM from Sweet?
My Role PM didn't say anything about the Gambler, it only spoke about my amazing body.
Hot!

User avatar
BunnyGo
Posts: 17236
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#364 Post by BunnyGo » Fri Aug 09, 2024 1:29 am

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Aug 09, 2024 1:08 am
Can anyone else validate my thinking here?

Will has outright said that he tried to set a reaction test trap for me, based on knowing that the Gambler's Role PM was different to the Gambler rules described in the Setup Document.

How can anyone know there would be a difference between those two things UNLESS THEY ARE SCUM?
To be fair, he's been getting you to give us all a lot of reactions...
The moral of the boy who cried wolf? Never tell the same lie twice--Elim Garak

Take a minute of your day to be nice to someone, you dumb son of a bitch -- Iron Sheik

Hamilton Brian
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 5367
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#365 Post by Hamilton Brian » Fri Aug 09, 2024 1:29 am

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Aug 09, 2024 1:21 am
Brian you appear to be only reacting to Flavius and unaware of anyone else posting, what gives?
I am catching up and responding as I go along. If you look I have replied to Dip, Bunny, Flavius. Probably had a quip or a notable about you. Just reading, asking questions. Just now saw your exchange with Will. I'll get to that at some point tonight I hope.

User avatar
JustAGuyNamedWill
Posts: 6604
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
Location: Just some town
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#366 Post by JustAGuyNamedWill » Fri Aug 09, 2024 1:55 am

Hamilton Brian wrote:
Fri Aug 09, 2024 1:20 am
JustAGuyNamedWill wrote:
Fri Aug 09, 2024 12:31 am


In response to Ham: as someone who is routinely skill issuing as town i do actually think i need meta to be townread. It is very rare not for me to be in contention for a D1
I don't understand this phrase. What are you trying to say here?
Means I’ve been playing p bad the last few games

User avatar
JustAGuyNamedWill
Posts: 6604
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
Location: Just some town
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#367 Post by JustAGuyNamedWill » Fri Aug 09, 2024 1:56 am

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Aug 09, 2024 1:03 am
JustAGuyNamedWill wrote:
Fri Aug 09, 2024 1:00 am
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Aug 09, 2024 12:57 am


Huh?

Do you have a reason for thinking that the Gambler's Role PM is different from the way it is written in the setup?

What is that reason?
No no Jamie you’re misunderstanding

I don’t think you’re someone who doesn’t understand a setup

I was trying to check if the way you learned the gambler powers was from reading your role pm or by remembering the setup
Why do you think those two things would be different??

If I was the Gambler (which I'm not), why do you think my role PM and the setup would differ?

This only makes sense if you have seen the Gambler role PM and I think you might be the Gambler.
No Jamie I’m not saying that

I’m saying that they more than likely give the exact same info. So as scum you would not read the setup for details on your role

I am not saying I think they are different. I dunno if it is or isn’t but my assumption is that it’s the same

User avatar
kingofthepirates
Posts: 1553
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2023 11:34 pm
Location: Dragon Temple, Crumbling Farum Azula, The Lands Between
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#368 Post by kingofthepirates » Fri Aug 09, 2024 2:00 am

*yawn* good morning. oh! flavius is here! hurrah! I don't like the 6 pages of silence thing, and agree with hb, at least drop a greeting :(

I think will's rt was a bit wack (and maybe this is just my lack of understand about the game, but the crumb was placed awkwardly), and jamie's response is fine. slight scum points for will in my book. NIA jamie's response. I do think Jamie's defense of haze is rather out of the blue though, which is slightly scummy. Not enough for me to jump to voting them though.

haven't noticed any particular issues yet. ##unvote since flav came back. chaqa seems to still be flying under the radar, surprisingly. ##vote chaqa. let's see if we can squeeze anything out of this...

currently most inclined to keep the vote on chaqa (reasoning hasn't changed). haze is a fine secondary target in my book, I agree that their posts seem to be lacking in substance with only 1 read and they're pretty passive on the solving side (not really pushing questions/grilling anyone for their responses).
As astra per amorem

User avatar
Haze with a Z
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#369 Post by Haze with a Z » Fri Aug 09, 2024 3:10 am

DiplomacyandWarfare wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:25 pm
Haze with a Z wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:04 pm
DiplomacyandWarfare wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2024 1:30 pm
Immediate readlist that I composed in 10 seconds.
Disclaimer: This may not reflect my reads in the future, and I cannot write a 1k word post about each of these reads (except DipandWar cause they're so towny)

Town
DipandWar
BunnyGo
Damo
Ghug
Null line = Everyone Else
Jamiet
Chaqa
Why no long setup analysis post this game?
A: Haven't gotten to it yet
B: Apparently I post long posts when I'm scum.
I assumed at this point that B is made up by brain to push you when you are town tbh so now your lazy low effort posts feel scummy tbh.

User avatar
Haze with a Z
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#370 Post by Haze with a Z » Fri Aug 09, 2024 3:14 am

DiplomacyandWarfare wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:30 pm
Haze with a Z wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:07 pm
Like posting at 120 posts is more risky than 200 based on what it sounds like you are saying
Well that's an entirely different point
but sure
anyways im trying to post a lot (>100 posts per day (NOT out of game day))
that seems like a decent strategy given the mech
agreed?
I agree although this seems more like a strategy to protect yourself from only having 15 posts than a strategy to try to limit the gambler’s post count which felt like the original goal.

User avatar
Haze with a Z
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#371 Post by Haze with a Z » Fri Aug 09, 2024 3:15 am

I’m kinda disappointed that the two people I’d put my vote on first are voting me. Which makes sense but I wasn’t expecting it tbh.

User avatar
Haze with a Z
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#372 Post by Haze with a Z » Fri Aug 09, 2024 3:17 am

DiplomacyandWarfare wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:32 pm
Haze with a Z wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:17 pm
##call gm

Hi this may be a really stupid question but if the gambler bets on themself how would that interact with the target?
The gambler is the target?
It's fairly obvious how this ends up working
for example, if the gambler bets on themself voting for someone, their vote won't work if they vote for that person, and it also won't work if they vote for someone else
I’m failing to see the purpose of the gambler making this bet though.

User avatar
Haze with a Z
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#373 Post by Haze with a Z » Fri Aug 09, 2024 3:17 am

Like why would the gambler give themselves net negative consequences?

User avatar
Haze with a Z
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#374 Post by Haze with a Z » Fri Aug 09, 2024 3:18 am

DiplomacyandWarfare wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:46 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:34 pm
DiplomacyandWarfare wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:32 pm


The gambler is the target?
It's fairly obvious how this ends up working
for example, if the gambler bets on themself voting for someone, their vote won't work if they vote for that person, and it also won't work if they vote for someone else
I think you're right about ##vote Haze
I will also ##vote haze because I feel that they have posted a lot and contributed nothing.
I’ve literally done more than you smh

User avatar
Haze with a Z
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#375 Post by Haze with a Z » Fri Aug 09, 2024 3:19 am

Like I could spend 10 seconds throwing names at a wall and have a crappy conclusion but it would be more than what you did tbh

User avatar
Haze with a Z
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#376 Post by Haze with a Z » Fri Aug 09, 2024 3:22 am

JustAGuyNamedWill wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2024 7:06 pm
Haze with a Z wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:12 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:01 pm


Scum has incentive to let it sit and see if nobody notices. Nobody else called it out, so I don't know why Will specifically would look townie for not calling it out.
I don’t even Know what we are talking about noticing tbh but I just think if someone won’t notice something as town they won’t notice it as scum tbh.
##VOTE HAZE scumbo
So you wanna explain what I’m supposed to be talking about? I’m not even directly sring you here and instead saying that it should be nai unlike the other person saying scum would hide it and instead you decide my conclusion is the worst out of the three because I simply don’t think that someone would read something more carefully just because they are scum?

User avatar
Haze with a Z
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#377 Post by Haze with a Z » Fri Aug 09, 2024 3:23 am

Like imo your conclusion on me from what you’ve said makes no sense unless the point I’m arguing makes no sense with whatever post we were talking about tbh

User avatar
Haze with a Z
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#378 Post by Haze with a Z » Fri Aug 09, 2024 3:24 am

sweetandcool wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2024 7:09 pm
Haze with a Z wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:17 pm
##call gm

Hi this may be a really stupid question but if the gambler bets on themself how would that interact with the target?
Nah, it's a fine question.

I see no problem following the document. If a Gambler bets on themselves and succeeds then they will earn that effect. If they manage to fail, then they earn that effect.
Ok yeah so what I’m reading is that it’s stupid for gambler to bet on themself because it’s a lose lose for them either way

User avatar
Haze with a Z
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#379 Post by Haze with a Z » Fri Aug 09, 2024 3:24 am

Prob not good to discuss that though tbh so I’ll try to shut up about that now

User avatar
Haze with a Z
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 3:34 am
Contact:

Re: WebMafia Olympics: Bonus Qualification Round

#380 Post by Haze with a Z » Fri Aug 09, 2024 3:26 am

JustAGuyNamedWill wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2024 7:10 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2024 12:43 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2024 3:43 am


Townslip. One down. Easy.

Hello fellow ghugspeople.
Solid call out; I think I'm giving Just a town point too for not calling it out.
Oh this

To be honest i just saw my name bc im vain like that and sort of disregarded it
Ok yeah I see no point in town not calling someone town if they notice something. This being said I don’t notice anything so it is clearly not super obvious or I’d be able to understand it

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]