I dont disagree with you but I dont think there has actually been a lot of analysis this game about who is "locktown". Actually there's been close to nothing remember how I said D2 is basically D1 1.0? Yea that hasnt changed , the focus is still quite shallow on who is actually scum, not good!TheFlyingBoat wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 10:22 amThe key point Flav and one that I make often when teaching people mafia and how to detect scum is that it is very hard, if not impossible for good mafia players to be locktown given that playing mafia well requires one to balance two diametrically opposing goals, advancing the scum interest vis a vis achieving the required magic number of miskills and looking town long enough to get there. Simply being lock town as mafia is a surefire way to defeat.FlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 9:12 amDont you think maybe just maybe the perfect strategy in this game perhaps the only way for mafia to win is to become locktown and early ? Then focus all of your attention on those who were initially viewed as scummy?President Eden wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2024 5:06 pm
geez, describing it like that, who would be suspicious
yea. His recent reads pivot is clearly just him manufacturing a worldview that conveniently lets him scumread the people who are auto-voting him tomorrow and townread the people who might wrongly bail him out. His position didn’t emerge from an organic reassessment of the game, just him “scheming” (literally his word not mine lol) about who his allies are. I suspect he’s giving you and only you a pass because he knows you’re going to die tonight
Rethinking the game is a necessity in a setup like this, I say we go for 2/3 of Damo, Will & I (worcej's reads) then we pick one more person for our third kill
When evaluating players try to find where behavior seemed to advance scum interests in ways that were worth appearing less town. I also feel you're making this suggestion in part to setup another goofy manipulation of the end of round gamestate just like Damo did.
WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
- FlaviusAetius
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
- FlaviusAetius
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Also I support endvoting and Im not sure why that conversation basically stopped when worcej died
- FlaviusAetius
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Im not saying what damo did yesterday was good or bad, Im saying it basically brought us to neutral which actually isnt such a bad thing as all the doomsayers are saying.TheFlyingBoat wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 10:31 amIf this is your point (a point I made earlier today) then how do more NKs add more/better evidence to the pot in way that was superior to taking 2 DKs yesterday? Your whole argument centered around the idea that NKs benefited us with superior knowledge and therefore we want more of them to happen before we start making double+ DKs and now you're arguing that the NK has could have logic of A and not A with no way of clearly assigning probabilities to them. Make it make sense.FlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 9:34 amANDDD thats the issue! But also the solution we can do it ALL! We can vote for who worcej thought was scum and we can vote for who worcej thought was town . Mafia killed worcej for a reason either because he has the scum on his sights or he doesnt . Shouldn't matter for us because we are killing three people and that can encompass all possibilities !GlitterBomb wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 9:31 am
What if…. Worcej was killed because it very obviously then frames Damo? Worc was livid with what happened at EOD and the last minute vote that resulted in only one kill. It almost seems too neat that Worc would be the one to die. Like bait.
It made it so we have a 2nd shot at getting D1 right(remember how Worcej said you gotta hav ea good D1? I agree ) The more information we have to asses it the better! Im not saying we should go infinite lets get all the NKs we can get, Im saying this one time maybe having a D1 one with an NK already on done isnt the end of the world .
IN FACT
I think we can use this situation to our benefit by using worcej's reads and scattershotting our kills using them
- FlaviusAetius
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
YES! Damo & Will should die today, we MIGHT have an opportunity to pull off the Damo kill and wait for D3 since he is a lock kill anywaysPresident Eden wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 6:42 pmi’m like… simultaneously cooling on flav being mafia and getting closer to damo/will team.
and then also feeling like if we get to F3 with one of me/glitterbomb + chaqa + tfb that it’s basically auto-win.
@damo you actually responded to worcej saying you would be a willing D2 sacrifice do you still have that opinion ? Cause it sounds like no
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33941
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Vote Count 2.2
Damo (3) - TheFlyingBoat, President Eden, Chaqa
FlaviusAetius (2) - President Eden, TheFlyingBoat
Chaqa (2) - FlaviusAetius, Damo666
TheFlyingBoat (1) - Damo666
JustaGuyNamedWill (1) - TheFlyingBoat
At present DAMO will be taken away.
23 hours and 49 minutes remain in Day Two.
Damo (3) - TheFlyingBoat, President Eden, Chaqa
FlaviusAetius (2) - President Eden, TheFlyingBoat
Chaqa (2) - FlaviusAetius, Damo666
TheFlyingBoat (1) - Damo666
JustaGuyNamedWill (1) - TheFlyingBoat
At present DAMO will be taken away.
23 hours and 49 minutes remain in Day Two.
Potato, potato; potato.
- GlitterBomb
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2024 11:10 pm
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Alright, I might be going down a rabbit hole here…but here I go!
I wrote out some notes on paper and broke down votes based on who voted for who on D1 and who has voted for who so far now with D2. I was hoping to see some consistencies or maybe alignments or anything that stood out.
To me, there wasn’t much info on Day 1. So in theory, mafia could have more than likely spread out their votes and avoided the need to vote for each other.
Eden and TFB voted the same. Though insanely early, Worcej voted for Eden, but Chaqa didn’t stay true to the promise that anyone who voted Wden would get his vote. If that was so important, wouldn’t he still make sure to vote for Worcej even if the promise was made after the vote?
I think Damo is a distraction. I think intentions made sense in his head and based on what some are saying, it didn’t do a ton of harm to us, though it maybe gave us less information with fewer kills, as long as we don’t flub up this time.
It makes sense to me (as was previously mentioned) that there’s likely a yapper and a non-yapper. I’m thinking Chaqa/TFB or Chaqa/Flav. However I don’t want to place my votes just yet because I’m uber paranoid that we are gonna be faced with a repeat of what happened EOD1. TFB has placed votes for the most obvious three. Will has yet to vote and Damo seems to be aligned with at least one of my suspected pairings.
I could also be totally off and watch it be like Eden/Chaqa and the whole accidental vote, inability to unvote and stance of voting for anyone who votes for Eden was just a distraction. That would be brilliant.
I’m of the stance that while three kills could potentially get us two mafia, it could also knock us out. I really want to focus on trying to find the right one or two, so will at least vote for 2. So I’m still holding out for a bit till I see how more of this unfolds and to see how we can be closer to ensuring not getting screwed over again.
BrainBomb is laughing at me for my PAGES of notes on a notepad…. So I’ll call it good at that for now! =)
I wrote out some notes on paper and broke down votes based on who voted for who on D1 and who has voted for who so far now with D2. I was hoping to see some consistencies or maybe alignments or anything that stood out.
To me, there wasn’t much info on Day 1. So in theory, mafia could have more than likely spread out their votes and avoided the need to vote for each other.
Eden and TFB voted the same. Though insanely early, Worcej voted for Eden, but Chaqa didn’t stay true to the promise that anyone who voted Wden would get his vote. If that was so important, wouldn’t he still make sure to vote for Worcej even if the promise was made after the vote?
I think Damo is a distraction. I think intentions made sense in his head and based on what some are saying, it didn’t do a ton of harm to us, though it maybe gave us less information with fewer kills, as long as we don’t flub up this time.
It makes sense to me (as was previously mentioned) that there’s likely a yapper and a non-yapper. I’m thinking Chaqa/TFB or Chaqa/Flav. However I don’t want to place my votes just yet because I’m uber paranoid that we are gonna be faced with a repeat of what happened EOD1. TFB has placed votes for the most obvious three. Will has yet to vote and Damo seems to be aligned with at least one of my suspected pairings.
I could also be totally off and watch it be like Eden/Chaqa and the whole accidental vote, inability to unvote and stance of voting for anyone who votes for Eden was just a distraction. That would be brilliant.
I’m of the stance that while three kills could potentially get us two mafia, it could also knock us out. I really want to focus on trying to find the right one or two, so will at least vote for 2. So I’m still holding out for a bit till I see how more of this unfolds and to see how we can be closer to ensuring not getting screwed over again.
BrainBomb is laughing at me for my PAGES of notes on a notepad…. So I’ll call it good at that for now! =)
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Sorry my mistake. Didn't realise F3. Was thinking about DK3 lol.President Eden wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 7:24 pm…how do you figure that that F3 makes any sense lol
the whole premise is that you just need one obvtown in F3 to win. who is your obvtown in those two scenarios?
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
I'd gladly be in a 3 way kill with TFB and ChaqaFlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 9:40 pmYES! Damo & Will should die today, we MIGHT have an opportunity to pull off the Damo kill and wait for D3 since he is a lock kill anywaysPresident Eden wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 6:42 pmi’m like… simultaneously cooling on flav being mafia and getting closer to damo/will team.
and then also feeling like if we get to F3 with one of me/glitterbomb + chaqa + tfb that it’s basically auto-win.
@damo you actually responded to worcej saying you would be a willing D2 sacrifice do you still have that opinion ? Cause it sounds like no
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Excellent postGlitterBomb wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 10:18 pmAlright, I might be going down a rabbit hole here…but here I go!
I wrote out some notes on paper and broke down votes based on who voted for who on D1 and who has voted for who so far now with D2. I was hoping to see some consistencies or maybe alignments or anything that stood out.
To me, there wasn’t much info on Day 1. So in theory, mafia could have more than likely spread out their votes and avoided the need to vote for each other.
Eden and TFB voted the same. Though insanely early, Worcej voted for Eden, but Chaqa didn’t stay true to the promise that anyone who voted Wden would get his vote. If that was so important, wouldn’t he still make sure to vote for Worcej even if the promise was made after the vote?
I think Damo is a distraction. I think intentions made sense in his head and based on what some are saying, it didn’t do a ton of harm to us, though it maybe gave us less information with fewer kills, as long as we don’t flub up this time.
It makes sense to me (as was previously mentioned) that there’s likely a yapper and a non-yapper. I’m thinking Chaqa/TFB or Chaqa/Flav. However I don’t want to place my votes just yet because I’m uber paranoid that we are gonna be faced with a repeat of what happened EOD1. TFB has placed votes for the most obvious three. Will has yet to vote and Damo seems to be aligned with at least one of my suspected pairings.
I could also be totally off and watch it be like Eden/Chaqa and the whole accidental vote, inability to unvote and stance of voting for anyone who votes for Eden was just a distraction. That would be brilliant.
I’m of the stance that while three kills could potentially get us two mafia, it could also knock us out. I really want to focus on trying to find the right one or two, so will at least vote for 2. So I’m still holding out for a bit till I see how more of this unfolds and to see how we can be closer to ensuring not getting screwed over again.
BrainBomb is laughing at me for my PAGES of notes on a notepad…. So I’ll call it good at that for now! =)
- JustAGuyNamedWill
- Posts: 6604
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
- Location: Just some town
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
I would happily vote chaqa here
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
@Glitter why would I have voted
for worcej? He was my other strong town read.

- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Not sure how the emoji got in there but it fits the post so no big
- GlitterBomb
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2024 11:10 pm
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
But if that was your stance/policy then why wouldn’t it be consistent? Giving an exception for preference of who is most town to you seems off to me.
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
The issue is that two kills can also knock us out.GlitterBomb wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 10:18 pmAlright, I might be going down a rabbit hole here…but here I go!
I wrote out some notes on paper and broke down votes based on who voted for who on D1 and who has voted for who so far now with D2. I was hoping to see some consistencies or maybe alignments or anything that stood out.
To me, there wasn’t much info on Day 1. So in theory, mafia could have more than likely spread out their votes and avoided the need to vote for each other.
Eden and TFB voted the same. Though insanely early, Worcej voted for Eden, but Chaqa didn’t stay true to the promise that anyone who voted Wden would get his vote. If that was so important, wouldn’t he still make sure to vote for Worcej even if the promise was made after the vote?
I think Damo is a distraction. I think intentions made sense in his head and based on what some are saying, it didn’t do a ton of harm to us, though it maybe gave us less information with fewer kills, as long as we don’t flub up this time.
It makes sense to me (as was previously mentioned) that there’s likely a yapper and a non-yapper. I’m thinking Chaqa/TFB or Chaqa/Flav. However I don’t want to place my votes just yet because I’m uber paranoid that we are gonna be faced with a repeat of what happened EOD1. TFB has placed votes for the most obvious three. Will has yet to vote and Damo seems to be aligned with at least one of my suspected pairings.
I could also be totally off and watch it be like Eden/Chaqa and the whole accidental vote, inability to unvote and stance of voting for anyone who votes for Eden was just a distraction. That would be brilliant.
I’m of the stance that while three kills could potentially get us two mafia, it could also knock us out. I really want to focus on trying to find the right one or two, so will at least vote for 2. So I’m still holding out for a bit till I see how more of this unfolds and to see how we can be closer to ensuring not getting screwed over again.
BrainBomb is laughing at me for my PAGES of notes on a notepad…. So I’ll call it good at that for now! =)
The more kills we get the better chance we get the mafia. And some of us (including departed worcej) feel pretty strongly about damo.
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
I’m not sure that I’m seeing the inconsistency. I clearly did not apply it retroactively as I didn’t vote for worcej or myself, and there is literally no benefit to voting for worcej when I believe him to be town.GlitterBomb wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 10:55 pmBut if that was your stance/policy then why wouldn’t it be consistent? Giving an exception for preference of who is most town to you seems off to me.
You almost sound like you’d rather haven me to blindly obey some sort of tautological gimmick instead of voting for who I suspect could be mafia?
- JustAGuyNamedWill
- Posts: 6604
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
- Location: Just some town
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
‘Why are we killing damo?’
‘Oh hes obv scum after EOD 1’
‘Ok lets kill damo only then’
‘No im not confident’
I am more than happy to kill people outside me damo flav if we must do a 3 person kill
‘Oh hes obv scum after EOD 1’
‘Ok lets kill damo only then’
‘No im not confident’
I am more than happy to kill people outside me damo flav if we must do a 3 person kill
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Holy Patrick Star straw man BatmanJustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 11:01 pm‘Why are we killing damo?’
‘Oh hes obv scum after EOD 1’
‘Ok lets kill damo only then’
‘No im not confident’
I am more than happy to kill people outside me damo flav if we must do a 3 person kill
-
- Posts: 2080
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2020 10:24 pm
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Not shit you would. That would almost certainly set up a F3 of GBomb, Flav, and Will. The three weakest/least experienced players and two of the scummiest players. Could you be anymore obvscum?damo666 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 10:26 pmI'd gladly be in a 3 way kill with TFB and ChaqaFlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 9:40 pmYES! Damo & Will should die today, we MIGHT have an opportunity to pull off the Damo kill and wait for D3 since he is a lock kill anywaysPresident Eden wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 6:42 pmi’m like… simultaneously cooling on flav being mafia and getting closer to damo/will team.
and then also feeling like if we get to F3 with one of me/glitterbomb + chaqa + tfb that it’s basically auto-win.
@damo you actually responded to worcej saying you would be a willing D2 sacrifice do you still have that opinion ? Cause it sounds like no
- FlaviusAetius
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Alright I just listened to Chopin's Death march because thats what is happening rn. ##vote damo we need to stop playing around and figure out when this endvote is HAPPENING
-
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
- Location: possibly Britain
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
I disagree with some parts of your post, but it’s obvious you’re working hard to solve it. I didn’t need further convincing, but this post is lock town. So don’t take my disagreements as attacks, just some thoughts from a different perspective to consider.GlitterBomb wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 10:18 pmAlright, I might be going down a rabbit hole here…but here I go!
I wrote out some notes on paper and broke down votes based on who voted for who on D1 and who has voted for who so far now with D2. I was hoping to see some consistencies or maybe alignments or anything that stood out.
To me, there wasn’t much info on Day 1. So in theory, mafia could have more than likely spread out their votes and avoided the need to vote for each other.
Eden and TFB voted the same. Though insanely early, Worcej voted for Eden, but Chaqa didn’t stay true to the promise that anyone who voted Wden would get his vote. If that was so important, wouldn’t he still make sure to vote for Worcej even if the promise was made after the vote?
I think Damo is a distraction. I think intentions made sense in his head and based on what some are saying, it didn’t do a ton of harm to us, though it maybe gave us less information with fewer kills, as long as we don’t flub up this time.
It makes sense to me (as was previously mentioned) that there’s likely a yapper and a non-yapper. I’m thinking Chaqa/TFB or Chaqa/Flav. However I don’t want to place my votes just yet because I’m uber paranoid that we are gonna be faced with a repeat of what happened EOD1. TFB has placed votes for the most obvious three. Will has yet to vote and Damo seems to be aligned with at least one of my suspected pairings.
I could also be totally off and watch it be like Eden/Chaqa and the whole accidental vote, inability to unvote and stance of voting for anyone who votes for Eden was just a distraction. That would be brilliant.
I’m of the stance that while three kills could potentially get us two mafia, it could also knock us out. I really want to focus on trying to find the right one or two, so will at least vote for 2. So I’m still holding out for a bit till I see how more of this unfolds and to see how we can be closer to ensuring not getting screwed over again.
BrainBomb is laughing at me for my PAGES of notes on a notepad…. So I’ll call it good at that for now! =)
Thoughts:
1. Chaqa.
The most suspect part of Chaqa’s play to me was the initial vote on me, but I think the rest of his play has been pretty townie. I don’t think it’s a problem that he said he would vote anyone who votes me, but then didn’t vote people he independently believed to be town. The ultimate goal is to vote out mafia and protect your town teammates where you can. It would be MORE suspicious if he rigidly stuck to his promise and voted for more people he claimed to townread (after voting me and then townreading me the rest of the game lol).
2. TFB.
I don’t think it’s weird that he got zero votes D1. He quickly established himself as town, consistently contributed all day, and then made the objectively correct decision to push for two kills (which was thwarted by damo making an overt mafia power play). I don’t think that’s changed D2. I get why people are thinking about him more, since we can’t miss today and you never want to leave a stone unturned, but it should only take a quick peek under that stone to figure out TFB isn’t the move today.
3. damo.
I wouldn’t characterize damo’s play as not doing a ton of harm to us. Arranging a triple kill is going to be very difficult, maybe not even possible. He’s directly responsible for one less piece of info for our game-deciding choice today, and he made sure to keep all our top suspects alive, which is reducing our ability to indulge in lower-% considerations like Chaqa/TFB. I downplayed the severity a bit when it happened because (1) to me, it made damo lockscum, and (2) I don’t want my teammates demoralized and catastrophizing today when we all need to be at our sharpest and clearest. But let’s not mince words, damo fucked us, bad.
4. Yapper/nonyapper.
Who are you identifying as yappers and nonyappers here? I know where a couple of us stand, but I’m not totally sure where everyone is in your split.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]