WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Why is 3-2 preferable to 5-2?
-
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
- Location: possibly Britain
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
sir yes sir
humble suggestion - don’t be mad at caught scum damo for making open scum power plays
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Information.
You're intelligent enough to already know that answer dude.
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
This is my last post of the night phase.President Eden wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 10:51 pmsir yes sir
humble suggestion - don’t be mad at caught scum damo for making open scum power plays
I need to step back - I am irrationally angry.
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
During the night we quasi-vote to determine top 3 scum suspects. Everyone is only allowed to vote the top 2 survivors. Anyone breaking this rule gets auto voted by everyone else. That should work.
So everyone nominate their best guess at a scumpair.
Mine is Chaqa and Mrs Bomb.
- GlitterBomb
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2024 11:10 pm
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
I feel like you need a hug. That just happened so fast and against what I felt like was town’s agreed on or majority direction.worcej wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 10:52 pmThis is my last post of the night phase.President Eden wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 10:51 pmsir yes sir
humble suggestion - don’t be mad at caught scum damo for making open scum power plays
I need to step back - I am irrationally angry.
-
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
- Location: possibly Britain
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Yea so as I teased a moment ago, damo’s play only makes sense from scum perspective IMO.
Being confident in your townreads is good enough reason to stop the triple kill, because you’re not actually depriving town of a town-directed kill by slowing things down to 2 kills instead of 3. But it’s not good enough reason to derail the double kill because it takes away our ability to safely double kill next turn and possibly engineers our demise if the mafia figure out how to force a double kill next phase.
I firmly believe town damo would have worked that out and chosen one of two townreads between Will and Flav to save. It’s just too much of a selfish hero play for town damo IMO. And it perfectly aligns with scum incentives if you’re already not long for this world.
Real questions to me are:
(1) should we not simply double kill tomorrow anyway despite the risk? I am that confident damo is scum here.
(2) does scum damo do that if his partner is also one of Flav or Will?
Being confident in your townreads is good enough reason to stop the triple kill, because you’re not actually depriving town of a town-directed kill by slowing things down to 2 kills instead of 3. But it’s not good enough reason to derail the double kill because it takes away our ability to safely double kill next turn and possibly engineers our demise if the mafia figure out how to force a double kill next phase.
I firmly believe town damo would have worked that out and chosen one of two townreads between Will and Flav to save. It’s just too much of a selfish hero play for town damo IMO. And it perfectly aligns with scum incentives if you’re already not long for this world.
Real questions to me are:
(1) should we not simply double kill tomorrow anyway despite the risk? I am that confident damo is scum here.
(2) does scum damo do that if his partner is also one of Flav or Will?
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
I’m also pretty annoyed at Damo.
Not like furious but more disappointed
Not like furious but more disappointed
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
There are 2 live mafia as you well know.GlitterBomb wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 10:56 pmI feel like you need a hug. That just happened so fast and against what I felt like was town’s agreed on or majority direction.worcej wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 10:52 pmThis is my last post of the night phase.President Eden wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 10:51 pm
sir yes sir
humble suggestion - don’t be mad at caught scum damo for making open scum power plays
I need to step back - I am irrationally angry.
Btw you didn't vote for any of the top 4 wagons. The only player not to do so.
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
What about TFB's vote on lfischl?
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
I need to analyze the end of day a bit more.
But now we are at risk of mafia winning outright if they engineer a double kill tomorrow, and we will have the smallest possible amount of information to work with.
You’ve actually made one of the worst possible end of days happen
- GlitterBomb
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2024 11:10 pm
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Ummm what? Top four wagons? Does that mean top four players that were getting the most votes?damo666 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 11:01 pmThere are 2 live mafia as you well know.GlitterBomb wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 10:56 pmI feel like you need a hug. That just happened so fast and against what I felt like was town’s agreed on or majority direction.
Btw you didn't vote for any of the top 4 wagons. The only player not to do so.
Last I checked, Flav was in that category.
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Have you considered my proposal. We vote 2 and only 2 players tomorrow, anybody voting outside the chosen pair gets auto hammered.President Eden wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 10:57 pmYea so as I teased a moment ago, damo’s play only makes sense from scum perspective IMO.
Being confident in your townreads is good enough reason to stop the triple kill, because you’re not actually depriving town of a town-directed kill by slowing things down to 2 kills instead of 3. But it’s not good enough reason to derail the double kill because it takes away our ability to safely double kill next turn and possibly engineers our demise if the mafia figure out how to force a double kill next phase.
I firmly believe town damo would have worked that out and chosen one of two townreads between Will and Flav to save. It’s just too much of a selfish hero play for town damo IMO. And it perfectly aligns with scum incentives if you’re already not long for this world.
Real questions to me are:
(1) should we not simply double kill tomorrow anyway despite the risk? I am that confident damo is scum here.
(2) does scum damo do that if his partner is also one of Flav or Will?
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Disconnected enough and put two messages of frustration into JT for the GT.
But in general, Boat made his votes with 2 minutes left and wanted to process 2 kills.
You intentionally waited until the last second and even admit to purposely taking the DK down to 1 kill because of TFB's vote allowing you that opportunity.
-
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
- Location: possibly Britain
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Are you volunteering to be one of them?damo666 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 11:05 pmHave you considered my proposal. We vote 2 and only 2 players tomorrow, anybody voting outside the chosen pair gets auto hammered.President Eden wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 10:57 pmYea so as I teased a moment ago, damo’s play only makes sense from scum perspective IMO.
Being confident in your townreads is good enough reason to stop the triple kill, because you’re not actually depriving town of a town-directed kill by slowing things down to 2 kills instead of 3. But it’s not good enough reason to derail the double kill because it takes away our ability to safely double kill next turn and possibly engineers our demise if the mafia figure out how to force a double kill next phase.
I firmly believe town damo would have worked that out and chosen one of two townreads between Will and Flav to save. It’s just too much of a selfish hero play for town damo IMO. And it perfectly aligns with scum incentives if you’re already not long for this world.
Real questions to me are:
(1) should we not simply double kill tomorrow anyway despite the risk? I am that confident damo is scum here.
(2) does scum damo do that if his partner is also one of Flav or Will?
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
If lfischl had flipped scum would you all still be saying the same thing. Would you?
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
To 1, I think we're forced into the double kill regardless because scum have an easy out to accomplish it.President Eden wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 10:57 pmYea so as I teased a moment ago, damo’s play only makes sense from scum perspective IMO.
Being confident in your townreads is good enough reason to stop the triple kill, because you’re not actually depriving town of a town-directed kill by slowing things down to 2 kills instead of 3. But it’s not good enough reason to derail the double kill because it takes away our ability to safely double kill next turn and possibly engineers our demise if the mafia figure out how to force a double kill next phase.
I firmly believe town damo would have worked that out and chosen one of two townreads between Will and Flav to save. It’s just too much of a selfish hero play for town damo IMO. And it perfectly aligns with scum incentives if you’re already not long for this world.
Real questions to me are:
(1) should we not simply double kill tomorrow anyway despite the risk? I am that confident damo is scum here.
(2) does scum damo do that if his partner is also one of Flav or Will?
To 2 - yeah, I think scum damo would do this to save Flav or Will because losing his partner here would be disastrous.
-
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
- Location: possibly Britain
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Well no, because you would presumably not railroad your teammate and deprive yourself of two miskills.
lfischl being town is kind of a huge detail to brush over there lol.
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Yes I would be saying the same thing, but with significantly less anger at you and more disappointed at your selfishness like what Chaqa is.
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
If XYZ and I are the the top 2 survivors of a nightime scumvote I will vote XYZ at SOD and not make any other posts unless ABC voted other then me or XYZ and then I will hammer vote ABC.President Eden wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 11:06 pmAre you volunteering to be one of them?damo666 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 11:05 pmHave you considered my proposal. We vote 2 and only 2 players tomorrow, anybody voting outside the chosen pair gets auto hammered.President Eden wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 10:57 pmYea so as I teased a moment ago, damo’s play only makes sense from scum perspective IMO.
Being confident in your townreads is good enough reason to stop the triple kill, because you’re not actually depriving town of a town-directed kill by slowing things down to 2 kills instead of 3. But it’s not good enough reason to derail the double kill because it takes away our ability to safely double kill next turn and possibly engineers our demise if the mafia figure out how to force a double kill next phase.
I firmly believe town damo would have worked that out and chosen one of two townreads between Will and Flav to save. It’s just too much of a selfish hero play for town damo IMO. And it perfectly aligns with scum incentives if you’re already not long for this world.
Real questions to me are:
(1) should we not simply double kill tomorrow anyway despite the risk? I am that confident damo is scum here.
(2) does scum damo do that if his partner is also one of Flav or Will?
In other words yes.
If me and a scum die it will be 3-1 going into D3. I'm happy with that.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, brainbomb, DougJoe