Im PRETTY sure this is the first mention of this idea, I DONT think @Eden you are counted in this because Will is who came up with it first not you vocal proponent doesnt countJustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 3:22 pm##CALL GMJamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 10:21 am....if there is a a nine-way tie for first, everyone will die.
In case of an 9 player tie, is it a draw?
Also hear me out because this is going to sound crazy, what if we do an 8 player draw in votes and kill everyone except one? The odds of a town victory are greatly improved rather than playing normally
WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
- FlaviusAetius
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
- FlaviusAetius
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
And REMEMBER he said that D1 of a previous mafia olympics got messed up, I think he would try to be more cautious this setup not less...JustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 11:41 pmOn reread theres just something about this that doesnt make sense
The #1 priority as scum is to avoid bringing unnecessary attention to yourself, thats like incredibly important with this setup. And yet worcej, who mind you is not stupid, does the exact opposite of this. Assuming worcej is playing to win, I can only assume 1 of 3 things
A. Worcej just had a terrible opening and flubbed (unlikely)
B. He is mafia trying to be townread off WIFOM that he would never do this as mafia
C. He is town trying to be townread off WIFOM that he would never do this as mafia
I find in this game that with how aware worcej seems to be about needing to conserve miskills, that C is very unlikely, as it is risky and if C is the correct option, directly opposes what he seems to be most concerned about in needing to hit scum
I stated why I think A is unlikely, worcej I think is unlikely to do something like this
Thus I am left with B being the most likely option
##VOTE WORCEJ
- FlaviusAetius
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Trust NO ONE, my policy is that anything anyone says can make them mafia and then go from there, whoever is most mafia has almost nothing I can find that redeems themGlitterBomb wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 11:48 pmMy initial scum gut check is screaming Flavius. Many interesting points have been made on them.
But I’m also cautious and skeptical of the people who’ve been friendly. Worcej, Will…. But that’s just because I trust nobody.
PresidentEden talks a lot. Other don’t talk much at all. Perplexed by Chaqa and Damo.
- FlaviusAetius
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
FACTS, btw one of the main reasons you are voting worcej is one of the main reasons I VOTED for him, yet when I said it you said I was crazy , what's changed? WHY did you come around by saying everything I have already said?JustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:12 amVery disingenuous interpretationworcej wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:11 am”Scum wouldn’t bring unnecessary attention to themselves yet worcej did so he must be scum.”JustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 11:41 pm
On reread theres just something about this that doesnt make sense
The #1 priority as scum is to avoid bringing unnecessary attention to yourself, thats like incredibly important with this setup. And yet worcej, who mind you is not stupid, does the exact opposite of this. Assuming worcej is playing to win, I can only assume 1 of 3 things
A. Worcej just had a terrible opening and flubbed (unlikely)
B. He is mafia trying to be townread off WIFOM that he would never do this as mafia
C. He is town trying to be townread off WIFOM that he would never do this as mafia
I find in this game that with how aware worcej seems to be about needing to conserve miskills, that C is very unlikely, as it is risky and if C is the correct option, directly opposes what he seems to be most concerned about in needing to hit scum
I stated why I think A is unlikely, worcej I think is unlikely to do something like this
Thus I am left with B being the most likely option
##VOTE WORCEJ
- FlaviusAetius
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
nah people who know about their meta I dont trust not one BIT for them not to manipulate it when they are mafia
However...the points you are making against Will...I agree with
- FlaviusAetius
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
You YOURSELF said this list was interchangeable, I dont see how you can have any loyalty to the listJustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:22 amUpon reread I just found it incredibly strange the way you did all of thatworcej wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:20 amExplain why you voted me first before Flavius.JustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 7:22 pmTo avoid any further confusion
TOWN
Glitter
FlyingBoat
NULL
Lfischl
Chaqa
Damo
SCUM
Eden
Worc
Flavius
Ordered within groups
I think I forgot him because I assumed there were only 9 players. Plus eden saying its a 2/9 chance of hitting mafia if we do it random threw me off because i didnt realize he was excluding himself
Also if I was only voting you to save myself, why would I not stay consistent to this reads list while also potentially having you vote with my on Flavius?
I think it was you who asked me to join you on Flavius.
- FlaviusAetius
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
???
You are crazy for this, you have thought about this game a bunch but you only got vibes so far? That makes no sense
- FlaviusAetius
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Yes we did, I dont scumread for doing that idk what worcej is talking about, but his takedown of your post makes so much sense to me, I dont like that its coming from him, but he is clearly trying to get everyone to cast a lot of votes to make his votes not seem so bad...NGL you arent making me not scumread you rnJustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:30 amDidnt people literally scum me in that game for lurking?worcej wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:26 amCommentary on bold: “lurking” and “high volume” are not meta based things to get scummed for. It’s the actions/activity of the game that matters to me.JustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:18 am
Underlined: yes but not for the reason you think. It was not because it was a vote on me that I find it suspicious but rather a brash vote in general.
Bold: Do you not remember me being scum like two games ago where I lurked all game and posted like three times a phase? I mustnt be scum!
But in all seriousness this is implying you are unable to change how you play, and with games like these with unique mechanics, it is inevitable our gameplay will alter from our norm
I 100% think an excited entry by you is more scum indicative because Jamie sent the role PMs out many hours before the game and you strike me as the impatient player who is ready to launch when you get an exciting role.
Also yes I understand where you are coming from with the reasoning of my first post. I just find someone who thinks that scum will pounce on a mistake unlikely to throw two votes right away
- FlaviusAetius
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
AGREED this is a low content game and D1, and I dont like itworcej wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:32 amConsidering nothing really changed between your read list and your reread, I think you’re just caught justifying a shit move here.
At least I admittedly said my vote on you was bad, but the other 2 are solidly entrenched in reasons.
I look forward to the GT for this game - I think the other 6 town players should be admonished for being so cautious and scared to do something here.
- FlaviusAetius
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
9 players total, 7 town, 6 town besides worcej if he considers himself to be townJustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:40 amWhat do you mean other 6 town players? Assuming you know yourself to be town, that would be other 7 players?
I swear this player count thing is weird
- FlaviusAetius
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Nah no way you just said thisJustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:41 amI thought there were 10 playersworcej wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:41 amI am town dingly-dork.JustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:40 amWhat do you mean other 6 town players? Assuming you know yourself to be town, that would be other 7 players?
I swear this player count thing is weird
9 players, 2 scum, 6 other people are my teammates.
- FlaviusAetius
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Will is NOT the first person to come up with this idea it was CHAQAFlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 11:51 amIm PRETTY sure this is the first mention of this idea, I DONT think @Eden you are counted in this because Will is who came up with it first not you vocal proponent doesnt countJustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 3:22 pm##CALL GMJamiet99uk wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 10:21 am
....if there is a a nine-way tie for first, everyone will die.
In case of an 9 player tie, is it a draw?
Also hear me out because this is going to sound crazy, what if we do an 8 player draw in votes and kill everyone except one? The odds of a town victory are greatly improved rather than playing normally
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Can I just say that thinking people would play more of an active role but thinking I am scummy/bad/whatever for placing early votes, which is being more active, is ironic and inconsistent logic.FlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 11:36 amI think the exact opposite of you I think this setup actually makes poeple want to play a more active role in the game to shape the course and ensure the wagons dont get out of hand, with two kills D1's that is an important factor to considerTheFlyingBoat wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:39 pmI mean like theoretically I think this makes sense for a 2 mafia setup in a world where it's single day and there is the ability to switch votes. You have the open wolfer and the deep threat, a classic duo. But as explained, I think this setup changes the calculus of the mafia team to one of extreme risk aversion and wanting us to make the make first mistake before they seize upon it if that makes sense. Because where town can unvote and you have the classic deadline flashes and can track wagonomics it makes much more sense for the mafia to play a more active role in controlling the pace and pushes of wagons.FlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 8:30 am
Here's a great strategy to play as mafia, they are going to have one person whose open and talking and one person whose semi lurking ( impossible ) to fully lurk in this small game, right ?
So probably a skater everyone should reserve one vote for a skater, one vote for a yapper, and then the third vote for whoever
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Still no why it isn’t “right”FlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 11:37 amI initially thought there were only three votes you could cast max , I think voting early is FINE, evne in a 3 vote setup, but so many votes before others have even had a chance to vote or speak ? Now thats just not rightTheFlyingBoat wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:42 pmYes and no. I think the point that worcej and I made separately is that this is going to be more about who you choose to save among the town more than anything. While there is no going back on Eden and Will and why I would have preferred waiting, I think worcej does have the flexibility to act when you accept his premise. Don't have to like it to see the coherence.FlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 8:33 am
I think Eden is thinking exactly what I am; because worcej has voted so early, he is going to be arguing that Eden & Will are mafia pretty much no matter what they do or say. He can practically be ignored for them, and he'd rather focus his attention to make sure others don't follow his folly
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
I “doubled down” by voting for you after you voted me with the awful reasoning that has gotten 3 other votes on you lolFlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 11:39 amYea but multiple people told him it was a bad idea and he's doubled down on those two mistakes just uncharacteristic I would say. AND these werent just early votes these were unjustified early votes, the case has yet to be made on themTheFlyingBoat wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:47 pmYou fearkilled worc early? Damn has the meta changed that much while I was gone?!?!? I suppose me, durga, snowy, and kgray being gone has changed thingsFlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 8:44 amTalking about meta reasons why worcej is acting sus here, I generally think worcej is a smart fellow, in fact when I was scum in my last mafia game I took him out for that reason, he isn't acting very smart here, not good
Not only did he not read the setup correctly regarding MK's he ALSO parked two votes early on little evidenceHasn't ghug been around though? I know he isn't as good as me, but he's still alright
![]()
Ok, more seriously, despite having some fun over beer following a job interview, I think you're oversussing worcej here. I think the miscount on MKs and the parked votes are both NAI to town-reading honestly.
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Did you ever think to ask me why I thought D1 was messed up?FlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 11:54 amAnd REMEMBER he said that D1 of a previous mafia olympics got messed up, I think he would try to be more cautious this setup not less...JustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 11:41 pmOn reread theres just something about this that doesnt make sense
The #1 priority as scum is to avoid bringing unnecessary attention to yourself, thats like incredibly important with this setup. And yet worcej, who mind you is not stupid, does the exact opposite of this. Assuming worcej is playing to win, I can only assume 1 of 3 things
A. Worcej just had a terrible opening and flubbed (unlikely)
B. He is mafia trying to be townread off WIFOM that he would never do this as mafia
C. He is town trying to be townread off WIFOM that he would never do this as mafia
I find in this game that with how aware worcej seems to be about needing to conserve miskills, that C is very unlikely, as it is risky and if C is the correct option, directly opposes what he seems to be most concerned about in needing to hit scum
I stated why I think A is unlikely, worcej I think is unlikely to do something like this
Thus I am left with B being the most likely option
##VOTE WORCEJ
You just grabbed at my statement and applied your own judgement of my actions (that I messed up this D1) and apparently voted for me.
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
So is the why for why you voted me what Will said?FlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 11:58 amFACTS, btw one of the main reasons you are voting worcej is one of the main reasons I VOTED for him, yet when I said it you said I was crazy , what's changed? WHY did you come around by saying everything I have already said?
I think I have asked you 10+ times to explain your vote and for the love of god you still haven’t explained it.
- FlaviusAetius
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
I think you make an excellent point about Chaqa and I have seen much that changes my thoughts on him eitherTheFlyingBoat wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:46 amTop = most town, Bottom = least town
Worc
People often misconstrue behavior they don't like as scummy. None of the things people don't like seem scummy to me and I think his reaction to Eden gave very townie vibes. Serious engagement with mechs, was wrong about plenty, adjusted to being wrong and has been genuine in applying pressure with original reads.
Glitter
I am team Mrs. Bomb all the way. Is it possible I am the biggest mark in the history of marks of the classic newbie razzle dazzle? Possible, but idk I just feel like the vibes are right here. This is my least confident read but until given reason to think otherwise I feel positive vibes.
Eden
I think Eden tried to grapple with the crux of the game early in a way that he thought would be good for the town. He tried to get his system going and committed to it, held strong against attack for a while before finally backing down after being explained to why it was anti-town in this highly particular context. Genuine and novel engagement with the game makes me think Eden is town. He is a good player and has done things he could do as either alignment, but I have caught him before and I think for now he isn't throwing up anything highly sus to me. His reticence to OMGUS worcej wins him a lot of points in my book.
-------- My feel good bar
Will
Don't know Will and he had made some posts early which seemed town aligned, but his handling of Flav v Worc rubs me the wrong way. Still slightly lean town, but not as confident as I was early yesterday.
Lfischl
No clue if lfischl has changed since I've been gone. While he is more active than I am used to, he is still glaringly inactive and not contributing a whole ton. He is the definition of true random
Chaqa
I expect more from Chaqa. I am slightly worried about his Eden vote. I do think it was probably just a mistake and lolzy play because Chaqa and Eden things but like at the same time it is so easy for Chaqa to do so and hope to take out Eden early while throwing his hands up and saying awwww shucks guys, big oooopsie daisies here!
I would be much more favorable and be willing to chalk it up to town!Chaqa being goofy if he were contributing useful thoughts like I know he can.
---------------- Feel bad line
Damo
Damo is one of the best players in the game before. I've played with him heavily in both town and mafia games before on his side and he is a delight. Where the hell is that damo now? He throws out one question which reeks of being a setup for either a throwaway double wagon on two of the lowest activity townspeople he can find at the deadline or a runup of a wagon on a skilled town player (which I fear might be Eden) in order to get a huge miskill on a huge town asset.
I don't think damo+lfischl is a team unless the opening post was a direct warning/coaching for lfischl but I highly doubt damo would take that risk.
Based on my priors, odds are lfischl just doesn't see it and goes inactive and damo would have to justify running up inactive wagons other than lfischl, unless damo just didn't give a shit and was open to bussing him, figuring he'd have to hard carry anyways. And while that is theoretically possible, damo doesn't seem like the kind of guy to go that hard that fast.
Flavius
Off the bat seems to be the scummiest person around right now. If manufactured engagement was a person it would be Flavius. I posted this earlier on the reread, but I encourage y'all to go back and look yourselves. So much of his posting was just regurgitating that which has already been said followed by a bad push.
Damo & Fischl are both AFK from the game I dont see why you view them as different
##vote will Nothing is redeeming him for me anymore, nothing
ehhh I'd like to see more from Glitter ngl what I've seen so far though is good I guess
You should take a reread on Worcej I think EVERYTHING you say about Eden is spot on, and worcej has done the exact opposite
- Chaqa
- Bronze Donator
- Posts: 14306
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
- Location: Allentown, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
Reading this exchange had me dyingFlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 10:27 amOk well I guess we are both wrong. Early voting still means you cant undo your vote and it parks it, making you have to advocate for that person. HOWEVER, its true you dont just have three votes TOTALworcej wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 10:21 amLOLOLOLOLFlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 10:20 am
Im being gaslit
4. Persistent Votes:
Once you have voted for someone, your vote stays on them for the rest of the current Day phase, but as per (3) you can add your vote to other wagons too. Voting "unvote" is not allowed.
You are wrong here worcej
That (3) is referring to rule 3 dude.
- FlaviusAetius
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
- Contact:
Re: WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]
It didnt change for you though? Not only that when pressured on it and your vote you insisted that you had to be loyal to the listworcej wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:51 amOkay dummy.JustAGuyNamedWill wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:46 amIn full honesty worcej i dont really think my reasoning was bad. Call me dumb but i dont careworcej wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:43 amYou die is cast and I am trolling you because I am having fun doing it.
But I do think you're vote on me was shit and the cart (vote) was before the horse (good explanation) in your efforts to do so.
You didn't explain a change in reads of why I was more scummy than Flavius in any way and jumped to me when you made such an effort to provide an organized list by scummyness.
Also I dont understand why you put so much weight into a reads list i made early on. Early reads lists typically change a lot later in the game. And sure enough after rereading it did change. It should not be taken as gospel
#stillloveyouanyways
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, DougJoe, Google [Bot]