WebMafia Olympics - Game #2 - Star Trek TNG: The Republic of Q [GAME THREAD]

[damo666]

##vote worcej

Yep - literally not a single explanation on why I could be scum before this, just disagreeing with my style.

Confidence of scum in my votes:
Flavius: 60%
Eden: 33.89%
Will: 3.14%

You see this is why early voting is silly. Your Will vote at 3.14% carries as much weight as your 60% Flav vote.

P.S. I realise your spurious %s are piss-taking. Highly amusing.

Will Riker pi%

[GlitterBomb]

Caught up! Severely disliking the lack of posts made

1. Chaqa
2. Damo666
3. FlaviusAetius
4. Glitterbomb
5. JustAGuyNamedWill
6. Lfischl
7. President Eden
8. TheFlyingBoat
9. Worcej

these are all the people so far

damo = nobody
fischl = nobody
glitterbomb = nobody
chaqa = nobody

nobody = you havent contirbuted A LOT to the game so far im voting for one of those people i think their the skaters of D1 first 24 hours

Considering the fact that I had to take my husband to the hospital yesterday right as the game started and then juggle two children without power because a massive storm rolled through, I was pleased with the 3 or so posts I did manage to make. Also, most of the commentary was talking about bots and vote counts which I don’t understand. So just saying I’m going to be a potential vote or that I’m nobody based on those observations is super lame.

Welcome to the abuse your husband probably has complained about in passing lol

It’s all making sense now!

[Chaqa]

What happens if we engineer a tie with only one top vote getter?

[GlitterBomb]

Caught up! Severely disliking the lack of posts made

1. Chaqa
2. Damo666
3. FlaviusAetius
4. Glitterbomb
5. JustAGuyNamedWill
6. Lfischl
7. President Eden
8. TheFlyingBoat
9. Worcej

these are all the people so far

damo = nobody
fischl = nobody
glitterbomb = nobody
chaqa = nobody

nobody = you havent contirbuted A LOT to the game so far im voting for one of those people i think their the skaters of D1 first 24 hours

Considering the fact that I had to take my husband to the hospital yesterday right as the game started and then juggle two children without power because a massive storm rolled through, I was pleased with the 3 or so posts I did manage to make. Also, most of the commentary was talking about bots and vote counts which I don’t understand. So just saying I’m going to be a potential vote or that I’m nobody based on those observations is super lame.

Well done Mrs Bomb. You tell him.

PS don't worry about the bot, it's irrelevant this game.

Thanks! I’m not gonna just sit back and take it, wasn’t a strategy on my part…. Just a crappy day.

So now when it comes to what we are supposed to be doing…. Is it basically just throw out accusations and see how people behave and then based on history of how they’ve been in previous games, making conclusions accordingly? If so, then I’m suspicious of Flavius just throwing out voting early for no other reason than less than adequate posting (according to him) on Day 1. With that logic, are we just throwing crap at the wall and seeing what sticks? I asked questions, I engaged about the shorthand…. And for someone who doesn’t really know what the heck I’m doing, I don’t know what more can be expected of me?

[worcej]

##vote worcej

Yep - literally not a single explanation on why I could be scum before this, just disagreeing with my style.

Confidence of scum in my votes:
Flavius: 60%
Eden: 33.89%
Will: 3.14%

You see this is why early voting is silly. Your Will vote at 3.14% carries as much weight as your 60% Flav vote.

P.S. I realise your spurious %s are piss-taking. Highly amusing.

Will Riker pi%

I will 100% tell you the vote for will is the most piss taking, but Eden and Flavius have done things I think are scummy thus I am fine with my votes there currently.

[worcej]

Considering the fact that I had to take my husband to the hospital yesterday right as the game started and then juggle two children without power because a massive storm rolled through, I was pleased with the 3 or so posts I did manage to make. Also, most of the commentary was talking about bots and vote counts which I don’t understand. So just saying I’m going to be a potential vote or that I’m nobody based on those observations is super lame.

Well done Mrs Bomb. You tell him.

PS don't worry about the bot, it's irrelevant this game.

Thanks! I’m not gonna just sit back and take it, wasn’t a strategy on my part…. Just a crappy day.

So now when it comes to what we are supposed to be doing…. Is it basically just throw out accusations and see how people behave and then based on history of how they’ve been in previous games, making conclusions accordingly? If so, then I’m suspicious of Flavius just throwing out voting early for no other reason than less than adequate posting (according to him) on Day 1. With that logic, are we just throwing crap at the wall and seeing what sticks? I asked questions, I engaged about the shorthand…. And for someone who doesn’t really know what the heck I’m doing, I don’t know what more can be expected of me?

You’re kinda on point here.

This is a game of deduction and reasoning.

That being said, how do you feel about the fact Flavius is proposing to vote for low content people while he admonished my votes early for will and eden as bad?

[President Eden]

Talking about meta reasons why worcej is acting sus here, I generally think worcej is a smart fellow, in fact when I was scum in my last mafia game I took him out for that reason, he isn't acting very smart here, not good

Not only did he not read the setup correctly regarding MK's he ALSO parked two votes early on little evidence

I can’t stop reading this in Trump’s voice

[GlitterBomb]

Talking about meta reasons why worcej is acting sus here, I generally think worcej is a smart fellow, in fact when I was scum in my last mafia game I took him out for that reason, he isn't acting very smart here, not good

Not only did he not read the setup correctly regarding MK's he ALSO parked two votes early on little evidence

I can’t stop reading this in Trump’s voice

Now that you’ve said that, I can’t read it any other way!

[GlitterBomb]

Well done Mrs Bomb. You tell him.

PS don't worry about the bot, it's irrelevant this game.

Thanks! I’m not gonna just sit back and take it, wasn’t a strategy on my part…. Just a crappy day.

So now when it comes to what we are supposed to be doing…. Is it basically just throw out accusations and see how people behave and then based on history of how they’ve been in previous games, making conclusions accordingly? If so, then I’m suspicious of Flavius just throwing out voting early for no other reason than less than adequate posting (according to him) on Day 1. With that logic, are we just throwing crap at the wall and seeing what sticks? I asked questions, I engaged about the shorthand…. And for someone who doesn’t really know what the heck I’m doing, I don’t know what more can be expected of me?

You’re kinda on point here.

This is a game of deduction and reasoning.

That being said, how do you feel about the fact Flavius is proposing to vote for low content people while he admonished my votes early for will and eden as bad?

My mom always taught me that when you point one finger, you have three more pointing back at you! So that’s what I’m thinking of Flavius at the current moment.

I feel like the more important question here is : Is your profile photo Bob Barker?! If so, why????? Very random but I’m so here for it!

[damo666]

What happens if we engineer a tie with only one top vote getter?

Don't know what you mean. If only one top vote getter it's not a tie.

Ties for 1st place all die regardless of number.

With sole top and tie for second only top dies.

[damo666]

Considering the fact that I had to take my husband to the hospital yesterday right as the game started and then juggle two children without power because a massive storm rolled through, I was pleased with the 3 or so posts I did manage to make. Also, most of the commentary was talking about bots and vote counts which I don’t understand. So just saying I’m going to be a potential vote or that I’m nobody based on those observations is super lame.

Well done Mrs Bomb. You tell him.

PS don't worry about the bot, it's irrelevant this game.

Thanks! I’m not gonna just sit back and take it, wasn’t a strategy on my part…. Just a crappy day.

So now when it comes to what we are supposed to be doing…. Is it basically just throw out accusations and see how people behave and then based on history of how they’ve been in previous games, making conclusions accordingly? If so, then I’m suspicious of Flavius just throwing out voting early for no other reason than less than adequate posting (according to him) on Day 1. With that logic, are we just throwing crap at the wall and seeing what sticks? I asked questions, I engaged about the shorthand…. And for someone who doesn’t really know what the heck I’m doing, I don’t know what more can be expected of me?

Non reactions are probably just as important if not more so than actual reactions.

Also look out for people either avoiding each other or reacting to each other in an ott way. It may indicate a scum partnership.

[President Eden]

This feels exactly like Flavius’s last game here lol. I remember giving him a pass for his heavyhanded style thinking no scum would be this brazen… and then it turned out he was consciously leaning into that exact assumption as mafia and hiding in plain sight.

Thing is, he’s probably right that a low poster is mafia. I just suspect he’s the other one, and that the yapper/lurker vote plan is conveniently engineered to avoid him (since he’s referring to the trio of me/worc/Boat as the yappers here and excluding himself).

I’m conceding that the && thing was silly, but if you still care about it as a tool to read me, you can consider my && firmly planted on Flav atm

[Chaqa]

What happens if we engineer a tie with only one top vote getter?

Don't know what you mean. If only one top vote getter it's not a tie.

Ties for 1st place all die regardless of number.

With sole top and tie for second only top dies.

It sounds like one death then?

I meant like:

Person 1 - 5 votes
Person 2 and 3 - 3 votes each
etc

So in this case only Person 1 would die since the next person is tied?

[damo666]

This feels exactly like Flavius’s last game here lol. I remember giving him a pass for his heavyhanded style thinking no scum would be this brazen… and then it turned out he was consciously leaning into that exact assumption as mafia and hiding in plain sight.

Thing is, he’s probably right that a low poster is mafia. I just suspect he’s the other one, and that the yapper/lurker vote plan is conveniently engineered to avoid him (since he’s referring to the trio of me/worc/Boat as the yappers here and excluding himself).

I’m conceding that the && thing was silly, but if you still care about it as a tool to read me, you can consider my && firmly planted on Flav atm

The two I'm considering voting for atm are Flav and lfischl

ironic formatting intentional

[Chaqa]

This feels exactly like Flavius’s last game here lol. I remember giving him a pass for his heavyhanded style thinking no scum would be this brazen… and then it turned out he was consciously leaning into that exact assumption as mafia and hiding in plain sight.

Thing is, he’s probably right that a low poster is mafia. I just suspect he’s the other one, and that the yapper/lurker vote plan is conveniently engineered to avoid him (since he’s referring to the trio of me/worc/Boat as the yappers here and excluding himself).

I’m conceding that the && thing was silly, but if you still care about it as a tool to read me, you can consider my && firmly planted on Flav atm

I think the && voting is fine

[damo666]

What happens if we engineer a tie with only one top vote getter?

Don't know what you mean. If only one top vote getter it's not a tie.

Ties for 1st place all die regardless of number.

With sole top and tie for second only top dies.

It sounds like one death then?

I meant like:

Person 1 - 5 votes
Person 2 and 3 - 3 votes each
etc

So in this case only Person 1 would die since the next person is tied?

correct

[President Eden]

This feels exactly like Flavius’s last game here lol. I remember giving him a pass for his heavyhanded style thinking no scum would be this brazen… and then it turned out he was consciously leaning into that exact assumption as mafia and hiding in plain sight.

Thing is, he’s probably right that a low poster is mafia. I just suspect he’s the other one, and that the yapper/lurker vote plan is conveniently engineered to avoid him (since he’s referring to the trio of me/worc/Boat as the yappers here and excluding himself).

I’m conceding that the && thing was silly, but if you still care about it as a tool to read me, you can consider my && firmly planted on Flav atm

The two I'm considering voting for atm are Flav and lfischl

ironic formatting intentional

Lol

Yeah those are the exact names I’ve got in mind too. In fairness I’m not sure about you or Will or Chaqa yet either. (And I guess not GlitterBomb, but I like her vibes.)

I feel very good about worc being town and reasonably comfy about Boat and GB

[President Eden]

This feels exactly like Flavius’s last game here lol. I remember giving him a pass for his heavyhanded style thinking no scum would be this brazen… and then it turned out he was consciously leaning into that exact assumption as mafia and hiding in plain sight.

Thing is, he’s probably right that a low poster is mafia. I just suspect he’s the other one, and that the yapper/lurker vote plan is conveniently engineered to avoid him (since he’s referring to the trio of me/worc/Boat as the yappers here and excluding himself).

I’m conceding that the && thing was silly, but if you still care about it as a tool to read me, you can consider my && firmly planted on Flav atm

I think the && voting is fine

Their critique is that unless someone is actually going to search up the && votes, it’s pointless. And I think they’re right about that, and I know no one is going to do all that, so I think they’re correct that it’s silly

Unless you’re volunteering lol

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

Second

Am I crazy or is this such a weird post to open with? "Second"? What's that even supposed to mean

I was second. Because Jamie already posted. I thought people would pick up on that lol

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

##vote will

Yes I know that I cannot take this back.

Boooooo

I think I know why you did as well bc if this post you quoted is the reason you voted me, im assuming you think I would be excited to start the game as scum and thus would be the first to post

Am I right or am I right lol

I just dont understand the post, usually in the start of the game people are trying to break the ice and get people talking , you definetly didnt do that with your first post, ontop of that you also said " Second " not FIRST. ummm? You were first so why type second

I DID do that you just didn’t read like a single post down what are you talking about????

You are clearly just looking for reasons to scum somebody. I’d be very surprised if two or three posts down you didn’t completely revert to scumming idk damo or worcej