M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
damo666
Posts: 20273
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2561 Post by damo666 » Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:41 pm

Balki Bartokomous wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 4:05 pm
Chaqa wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 4:04 pm
I started rereading Bozo as part of my case and I actually kinda like what I'm reading. I think maybe I was just tunneled on his weird read on me. I think I want to back off pushing him today.
Here are your choices:

POE: Sweet, Jamiet, rdrivera, Fish, Demon, Bozo, worcej, BunnyG
Does Balki put 1 or 2 teammates in here? (Zero or all 3 seem unlikely).

rdr and Bozo?

User avatar
DemonRHK
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 3033
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 5:08 am
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2562 Post by DemonRHK » Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:43 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:40 pm
lfischl wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:32 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:31 pm


I did not fire a shot, FWIW.
I didn't either
I thought the agreement was lawmen should stay hidden. This is scummy posting here

Even knowing that a lawman shot worcej (I agree on other two) then we still have no idea how many lawmen are left.
The gunned, unfired lawmen need to hide.

Scum likely know what shots were taken, and a spent lawmen is nothing more than the softest of clears, as we can't confirm them.

damo666
Posts: 20273
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2563 Post by damo666 » Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:47 pm

Chaqa wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 4:14 pm
Balki Bartokomous wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 4:05 pm
Chaqa wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 4:04 pm
I started rereading Bozo as part of my case and I actually kinda like what I'm reading. I think maybe I was just tunneled on his weird read on me. I think I want to back off pushing him today.
Here are your choices:

POE: Sweet, Jamiet, rdrivera, Fish, Demon, Bozo, worcej, BunnyG
I think my POE is currently at Balki, brain, damo, Demon, KOTP, Lfischl, rivera, worcej

I think Damo is being an undue pass by many.
Given Chaqa was killed I reckon he must have had AT LEAST one more scum in there in addition to Balki. Omitting the dead and obvtowns this leaves {brain, kotp, lfischl, rdr}. I think we should concentrate on this group. My order S=>T is kotp, rdr, brain, lfischl.

sweetandcool
Posts: 4890
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 8:21 pm
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2564 Post by sweetandcool » Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:50 pm

DemonRHK wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:43 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:40 pm
lfischl wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:32 pm


I didn't either
I thought the agreement was lawmen should stay hidden. This is scummy posting here

Even knowing that a lawman shot worcej (I agree on other two) then we still have no idea how many lawmen are left.
The gunned, unfired lawmen need to hide.

Scum likely know what shots were taken, and a spent lawmen is nothing more than the softest of clears, as we can't confirm them.
And they hide in a crowd.

But I'll help. I was the one who shot worcej.

Hard claim!

damo666
Posts: 20273
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2565 Post by damo666 » Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:51 pm

DemonRHK wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:43 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:40 pm
lfischl wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:32 pm


I didn't either
I thought the agreement was lawmen should stay hidden. This is scummy posting here

Even knowing that a lawman shot worcej (I agree on other two) then we still have no idea how many lawmen are left.
The gunned, unfired lawmen need to hide.

Scum likely know what shots were taken, and a spent lawmen is nothing more than the softest of clears, as we can't confirm them.
We may have dead unactivated lawmen.

I very much doubt we have any activated holstered lawmen tbh. Hopefully some of us get activated tomorrow.

lfischl
Posts: 988
Joined: Wed May 06, 2020 2:43 pm
Location: The area by the bay
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2566 Post by lfischl » Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:51 pm

sweetandcool wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:50 pm
DemonRHK wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:43 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:40 pm


I thought the agreement was lawmen should stay hidden. This is scummy posting here

Even knowing that a lawman shot worcej (I agree on other two) then we still have no idea how many lawmen are left.
The gunned, unfired lawmen need to hide.

Scum likely know what shots were taken, and a spent lawmen is nothing more than the softest of clears, as we can't confirm them.
And they hide in a crowd.

But I'll help. I was the one who shot worcej.

Hard claim!
:lol: :lol: :lol:

damo666
Posts: 20273
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2567 Post by damo666 » Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:53 pm

sweet has had a brain transplant.

'brain'

geddit?

damo666
Posts: 20273
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2568 Post by damo666 » Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:54 pm

sweetandcool wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:50 pm
DemonRHK wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:43 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:40 pm


I thought the agreement was lawmen should stay hidden. This is scummy posting here

Even knowing that a lawman shot worcej (I agree on other two) then we still have no idea how many lawmen are left.
The gunned, unfired lawmen need to hide.

Scum likely know what shots were taken, and a spent lawmen is nothing more than the softest of clears, as we can't confirm them.
And they hide in a crowd.

But I'll help. I was the one who shot worcej.

Hard claim!
I'm Spartacus.

Actually, no, I'm not.

User avatar
BunnyGo
Posts: 17236
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2569 Post by BunnyGo » Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:56 pm

damo666 wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:51 pm
DemonRHK wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:43 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:40 pm


I thought the agreement was lawmen should stay hidden. This is scummy posting here

Even knowing that a lawman shot worcej (I agree on other two) then we still have no idea how many lawmen are left.
The gunned, unfired lawmen need to hide.

Scum likely know what shots were taken, and a spent lawmen is nothing more than the softest of clears, as we can't confirm them.
We may have dead unactivated lawmen.

I very much doubt we have any activated holstered lawmen tbh. Hopefully some of us get activated tomorrow.
I didn’t holster my shot today. If I had a gun, I shot worcej.
The moral of the boy who cried wolf? Never tell the same lie twice--Elim Garak

Take a minute of your day to be nice to someone, you dumb son of a bitch -- Iron Sheik

User avatar
BunnyGo
Posts: 17236
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2570 Post by BunnyGo » Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:58 pm

damo666 wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:53 pm
sweet has had a brain transplant.

'brain'

geddit?
I honestly can’t tell with him. His self assessment seems off. But I believe him to be a good chess player. So I believe he is aware what strong play and ability is.

But he also has made statements that suggest he thinks he’s a strong mathematician. And now the spades statement. I think his calibration may be off. But I honestly don’t know.
The moral of the boy who cried wolf? Never tell the same lie twice--Elim Garak

Take a minute of your day to be nice to someone, you dumb son of a bitch -- Iron Sheik

damo666
Posts: 20273
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2571 Post by damo666 » Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:00 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:58 pm
damo666 wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:53 pm
sweet has had a brain transplant.

'brain'

geddit?
I honestly can’t tell with him. His self assessment seems off. But I believe him to be a good chess player. So I believe he is aware what strong play and ability is.

But he also has made statements that suggest he thinks he’s a strong mathematician. And now the spades statement. I think his calibration may be off. But I honestly don’t know.
but he's deffo town, right?

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2572 Post by Jamiet99uk » Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:00 pm

DemonRHK wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:43 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:40 pm
lfischl wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:32 pm


I didn't either
I thought the agreement was lawmen should stay hidden. This is scummy posting here

Even knowing that a lawman shot worcej (I agree on other two) then we still have no idea how many lawmen are left.
The gunned, unfired lawmen need to hide.

Scum likely know what shots were taken, and a spent lawmen is nothing more than the softest of clears, as we can't confirm them.
Ok sorry.
Potato, potato; potato.

damo666
Posts: 20273
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2573 Post by damo666 » Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:02 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:00 pm
DemonRHK wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:43 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:40 pm


I thought the agreement was lawmen should stay hidden. This is scummy posting here

Even knowing that a lawman shot worcej (I agree on other two) then we still have no idea how many lawmen are left.
The gunned, unfired lawmen need to hide.

Scum likely know what shots were taken, and a spent lawmen is nothing more than the softest of clears, as we can't confirm them.
Ok sorry.
Jamie what does your sign off mean?

User avatar
DemonRHK
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 3033
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 5:08 am
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2574 Post by DemonRHK » Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:03 pm

sweetandcool wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:50 pm
DemonRHK wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:43 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:40 pm


I thought the agreement was lawmen should stay hidden. This is scummy posting here

Even knowing that a lawman shot worcej (I agree on other two) then we still have no idea how many lawmen are left.
The gunned, unfired lawmen need to hide.

Scum likely know what shots were taken, and a spent lawmen is nothing more than the softest of clears, as we can't confirm them.
And they hide in a crowd.

But I'll help. I was the one who shot worcej.

Hard claim!
Image

sweetandcool
Posts: 4890
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 8:21 pm
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2575 Post by sweetandcool » Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:03 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:58 pm
damo666 wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:53 pm
sweet has had a brain transplant.

'brain'

geddit?
I honestly can’t tell with him. His self assessment seems off. But I believe him to be a good chess player. So I believe he is aware what strong play and ability is.

But he also has made statements that suggest he thinks he’s a strong mathematician. And now the spades statement. I think his calibration may be off. But I honestly don’t know.
I literally am a Mathematician. Not necessarily a strong one. I know plenty of others much stronger than myself.

User avatar
BunnyGo
Posts: 17236
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2576 Post by BunnyGo » Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:03 pm

damo666 wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:00 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:58 pm
damo666 wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:53 pm
sweet has had a brain transplant.

'brain'

geddit?
I honestly can’t tell with him. His self assessment seems off. But I believe him to be a good chess player. So I believe he is aware what strong play and ability is.

But he also has made statements that suggest he thinks he’s a strong mathematician. And now the spades statement. I think his calibration may be off. But I honestly don’t know.
but he's deffo town, right?
No. Still random. Like worcej, he’s banking on his game helping his scum game. By proving a point that we’re dumb (as a community) about the meta currently being used.
The moral of the boy who cried wolf? Never tell the same lie twice--Elim Garak

Take a minute of your day to be nice to someone, you dumb son of a bitch -- Iron Sheik

sweetandcool
Posts: 4890
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 8:21 pm
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2577 Post by sweetandcool » Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:05 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:03 pm
damo666 wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:00 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:58 pm


I honestly can’t tell with him. His self assessment seems off. But I believe him to be a good chess player. So I believe he is aware what strong play and ability is.

But he also has made statements that suggest he thinks he’s a strong mathematician. And now the spades statement. I think his calibration may be off. But I honestly don’t know.
but he's deffo town, right?
No. Still random. Like worcej, he’s banking on his game helping his scum game. By proving a point that we’re dumb (as a community) about the meta currently being used.
Absolutely not. I play the best I can with either alignment. Sandbagging is reprehensible.

User avatar
BunnyGo
Posts: 17236
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2578 Post by BunnyGo » Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:06 pm

sweetandcool wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:03 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:58 pm
damo666 wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:53 pm
sweet has had a brain transplant.

'brain'

geddit?
I honestly can’t tell with him. His self assessment seems off. But I believe him to be a good chess player. So I believe he is aware what strong play and ability is.

But he also has made statements that suggest he thinks he’s a strong mathematician. And now the spades statement. I think his calibration may be off. But I honestly don’t know.
I literally am a Mathematician. Not necessarily a strong one. I know plenty of others much stronger than myself.
What does that mean to you? Like, that’s what I can never tell. You use words, and I don’t know what they mean. But I don’t know any mathematicians who seem to use words without meaning.


What I meant above is, I honestly can’t tell who you are. At once you seem self aware, but then at another time seem to use words that can’t possibly mean what I think most people of that community would define that way.
The moral of the boy who cried wolf? Never tell the same lie twice--Elim Garak

Take a minute of your day to be nice to someone, you dumb son of a bitch -- Iron Sheik

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2579 Post by Jamiet99uk » Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:06 pm

damo666 wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:02 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:00 pm
DemonRHK wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:43 pm


The gunned, unfired lawmen need to hide.

Scum likely know what shots were taken, and a spent lawmen is nothing more than the softest of clears, as we can't confirm them.
Ok sorry.
Jamie what does your sign off mean?
My what?

My signature is the same "this is my potato" script I've had for a while, but I Eapwranto.
Potato, potato; potato.

User avatar
BunnyGo
Posts: 17236
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#2580 Post by BunnyGo » Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:06 pm

sweetandcool wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:05 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:03 pm
damo666 wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:00 pm


but he's deffo town, right?
No. Still random. Like worcej, he’s banking on his game helping his scum game. By proving a point that we’re dumb (as a community) about the meta currently being used.
Absolutely not. I play the best I can with either alignment. Sandbagging is reprehensible.
Ok. Good.
The moral of the boy who cried wolf? Never tell the same lie twice--Elim Garak

Take a minute of your day to be nice to someone, you dumb son of a bitch -- Iron Sheik

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: gjdip