M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

[FlaviusAetius]

TSA: except if you are Sweet. Sweet should hard claim Lawman right now.

I'm the Sheriff so sadly it's not possible.

X to doubt

[FlaviusAetius]

What's this here plan now?

All you really need to know now is don’t claim if you find out you are a lawman. We want you to hold your shot for now, and obviously we don’t want you killed before you can make that shot.

Not claiming seems clear enough. I don’t understand holding the shot.

Miskilling = game over basically so if you have a shot >use it< >ONLY< if you are >sure< you are going to kill a mafia shooting for info is >not< an option

[Vecna]

No, I pointed out some inconsistencies in Chaqa's reads, and foodcoats had some reasonable opinions.

I do think Flavius is likely to be town.

If you think Flavius is town, have you actually looked into brainbombs reasoning for scumreading him?

Im sort of surprised that you townread Flav, but are just joining together with brainbomb in questioning me for hours, while his basis for being suspicious of me lies in the fact I was protecting Flav.

Or do you view his reasoning different, or just dont care?

I have stated why I think you could be mafia, and it has nothing to do with Flavius. I do have a different opinion, I think it is more likely you were pocketing Flavius than protecting him.

So what were the reasons for Chaqa to be mafia, without mentioning Flavius?

[bozotheclown]

If you think Flavius is town, have you actually looked into brainbombs reasoning for scumreading him?

Im sort of surprised that you townread Flav, but are just joining together with brainbomb in questioning me for hours, while his basis for being suspicious of me lies in the fact I was protecting Flav.

Or do you view his reasoning different, or just dont care?

I have stated why I think you could be mafia, and it has nothing to do with Flavius. I do have a different opinion, I think it is more likely you were pocketing Flavius than protecting him.

So what were the reasons for Chaqa to be mafia, without mentioning Flavius?

Is chaqa being scum 100% conditional on flavius being town, and/or jamiet being scum in your mind Bozo?

You seem to only draw conclusions on Chaqa based on your perception of other players.

Is this inaccurate?

So you think Flavius is town correct?

No, I pointed out some inconsistencies in Chaqa's reads, and foodcoats had some reasonable opinions.

I do think Flavius is likely to be town.

[Vecna]

I have stated why I think you could be mafia, and it has nothing to do with Flavius. I do have a different opinion, I think it is more likely you were pocketing Flavius than protecting him.

So what were the reasons for Chaqa to be mafia, without mentioning Flavius?

Is chaqa being scum 100% conditional on flavius being town, and/or jamiet being scum in your mind Bozo?

You seem to only draw conclusions on Chaqa based on your perception of other players.

Is this inaccurate?

So you think Flavius is town correct?

No, I pointed out some inconsistencies in Chaqa's reads, and foodcoats had some reasonable opinions.

I do think Flavius is likely to be town.

You pointed those out N1.

Long after you started scumreading Chaqa

[bozotheclown]

So what were the reasons for Chaqa to be mafia, without mentioning Flavius?

No, I pointed out some inconsistencies in Chaqa's reads, and foodcoats had some reasonable opinions.

I do think Flavius is likely to be town.

You pointed those out N1.

Long after you started scumreading Chaqa

I had not expressed any read of Chaqa long before that.

[brainbomb]

I dont think flavius has to be scum for chaqa-vecna-jamie to be a team.

I scumread sweet now also for just not engaging with me

[Vecna]

but do I have to be scum for any of your theories to make sense?

Because if it relies on that, your theory is piss and shit.

[Vecna]

(which is the reason I tried to talk sense to you for hours on end, but heads are too far lodged up arses)

[bozotheclown]

All you really need to know now is don’t claim if you find out you are a lawman. We want you to hold your shot for now, and obviously we don’t want you killed before you can make that shot.

Not claiming seems clear enough. I don’t understand holding the shot.

Miskilling = game over basically so if you have a shot >use it< >ONLY< if you are >sure< you are going to kill a mafia shooting for info is >not< an option

I agree, it will be 11-4 D2, so assuming the mafia get their shots in, it will effectively be 7-4. A miss on the DK makes it effectively 5-4 D3. A missed Vig shot D2 means we go into D3 with our only chance being a Vig taking out a mafia who has not received their gun yet.

[brainbomb]

but do I have to be scum for any of your theories to make sense?

Because if it relies on that, your theory is piss and shit.

No
Not at all actually anyone can have an off game

[Vecna]

You pointed those out N1.

Long after you started scumreading Chaqa

I had not expressed any read of Chaqa long before that.

The point remains the same.

You start with an assumption (people pocketing Flav) - and then fit the rest of the information to fit that story. And you start it off by agreeing with a brainbomb theory that depends on Flav being scum.

It mightve luckily resulted in a correct conclusion on Chaqa (or who knows where), but its very faulty elsewhere.

[Vecna]

but do I have to be scum for any of your theories to make sense?

Because if it relies on that, your theory is piss and shit.

No
Not at all actually anyone can have an off game

The fault does not always lie with the observer

[brainbomb]

but do I have to be scum for any of your theories to make sense?

Because if it relies on that, your theory is piss and shit.

No
Not at all actually anyone can have an off game

The fault does not always lie with the observer

You can play badly. You always catch me when im scum

[bozotheclown]

You pointed those out N1.

Long after you started scumreading Chaqa

I had not expressed any read of Chaqa long before that.

The point remains the same.

You start with an assumption (people pocketing Flav) - and then fit the rest of the information to fit that story. And you start it off by agreeing with a brainbomb theory that depends on Flav being scum.

It mightve luckily resulted in a correct conclusion on Chaqa (or who knows where), but its very faulty elsewhere.

The pocketing of Flavius was not the starting point of my theory, it is something I noticed later.

[Vecna]

No
Not at all actually anyone can have an off game

The fault does not always lie with the observer

You can play badly. You always catch me when im scum

You did make it rather obvious the last few times by letting your emotions carry over from scumchat.

I dont think anyone is doing that this game. Well, maybe some people are a bit too cheerfull

[Vecna]

I had not expressed any read of Chaqa long before that.

The point remains the same.

You start with an assumption (people pocketing Flav) - and then fit the rest of the information to fit that story. And you start it off by agreeing with a brainbomb theory that depends on Flav being scum.

It mightve luckily resulted in a correct conclusion on Chaqa (or who knows where), but its very faulty elsewhere.

The pocketing of Flavius was not the starting point of my theory, it is something I noticed later.

This mustve played out in your head then because the carefull reader finds these details hard to find.

[brainbomb]

Vecna im not going to townread you on your bluster and snark.

[brainbomb]

Pulling out every trick in the book to flip my read is probably more of a scumtell tbh

[brainbomb]

Im angry, still itchy. My ankles are swollen from my issue. I cant walk very well. Busy as shit at work. I didnt get to be desp like id hoped. Thrn we lost three town day 1. I got half the game fighting me on someone im 1000% sure is scum; so its not an enjoyable game.