Mafia XL - A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum

[damo666]

Decent Ghug post.

You cannot be serious.

[ND]

Decent Ghug post.

wtf no it was terrible

I'm not going to defend his post lol, I didn't write it, but I do think there was some merit to it.

[ND]

thus 'decent'

[damo666]

Calling Vecna, ND , Bo & ghug

If any of you are town you are making a mistake voting for me.

If any of you are scum you know I am town.

[damo666]

thus 'decent'

some of it ok, some of it funny, some of it bollocks.

Decent? Nah.

[ND]

@Damo

I see a bit of a disparity in your reaction to your initial reaction to Ghug then to me:

"ghug - your apparent reason for voting me is my vote on Yav. But I later unvoted!!!"

To me this seems like you saw enough in his post to justify a response. If you thought it was outrageous they why respond in that manner?

Then your response to me: "You cannot be serious."

This implies more of a outrageous reaction to it. Like how can someone see value in that post?

What changed between the first reaction and the second?

[damo666]

Your reading too much into it ND.

I don't like his intimation that I am 'terrible' and the reason (or lack of one) for voting for me. So naturally I point out the hole in his 'reasoning' and react to your post praising his.

[Durga]

@Damo

I see a bit of a disparity in your reaction to your initial reaction to Ghug then to me:

"ghug - your apparent reason for voting me is my vote on Yav. But I later unvoted!!!"

To me this seems like you saw enough in his post to justify a response. If you thought it was outrageous they why respond in that manner?

Then your response to me: "You cannot be serious."

This implies more of a outrageous reaction to it. Like how can someone see value in that post?

What changed between the first reaction and the second?

My post :)

[ghug]

Ghug tell my ONE time as town you've posted a list like that with your shitty thoughts

Like every time I have to catch up?

[Tom Bombadil]

ND - Did you actually go back and read the pages ghug was referencing? Or did you just say decent post because it had lots of words?

[ghug]

ghug - your apparent reason for voting me is my vote on Yav. But I later unvoted!!!

Tom - thanks.

So?

[Durga]

Damo is incredibly defensive, I don't know why

[ND]

Your reading too much into it ND.

I don't like his intimation that I am 'terrible' and the reason (or lack of one) for voting for me. So naturally I point out the hole in his 'reasoning' and react to your post praising his.

Elaborate more on the hole you pointed out in the reasoning? That was about your Yav vote, correct? I also felt what you did with that vote was scum indicative hence part of the reason for my initial vote. Just because you unvoted doesn't make the initial action any less scum indicative in my opinion. Where's the hole? Because you unvoted it doesn't make it scum indicative? Am I understanding that right?

[ND]

ND - Did you actually go back and read the pages ghug was referencing? Or did you just say decent post because it had lots of words?

Uh, what? Why would I re-read the game because someone posted an analysis? Do you re-read the entire game every time someone posts a summary post or analysis post? If so you most re-read a lot.

[Tom Bombadil]

ND - Did you actually go back and read the pages ghug was referencing? Or did you just say decent post because it had lots of words?

Uh, what? Why would I re-read the game because someone posted an analysis? Do you re-read the entire game every time someone posts a summary post or analysis post? If so you most re-read a lot.

You said it was a decent post. What made it decent?

[Squigs44]

Wow I'm behind. Should not have played this time around.

Initial gut reactions from the quick read:
ghugs post is terrible
Vecnas quickfire start seems towny, although he seemed to be buddying me so maybe it's just that
Jamie's reaction to BBs comment was way more disruptive and detrimental to the game than BBs actual post. BB has said outside of the thread that he has had some crazy stuff in his personal life, so I'm pretty sure it was an honest mistake on his part and it's sad to see Jamie do what he did because of that mistake.
ND has a real case that he is pushing (even if I disagree with some of it), so that's towny.
Worcej is defensive but I scumread him legit everygame we play together.
I see why people jumped on Yav for his use of "we" but I don't think it is scum indicative on Yavs part.
I had something about Rdrivera but I forgot what it was so I'll have to iso him.
Bozos bad mechanic suggestion is probably NAI.

Can't remember much else from my quick read. I'll try to go into more specifics on few things now.

[ND]

@Tom: I'm not going to go point by point and state everything I found of decent or merit. Suffice to say there was enough there especially concerning a few of his player reads that I also share and also his suspicion of Damo.

What specifically about it do you not find decent?

What am I missing about Damo that makes him so much of a town read for you?

[Squigs44]

Rdrivera iso was less interesting than I thought. But I think he is a slight townread. He asks questions. He presents ideas different than others and argues them. He comments on several different players.

[ghug]

"ghug's post is terrible. Let me do what he did but lamer."

[ghug]

@Tom: I'm not going to go point by point and state everything I found of decent or merit. Suffice to say there was enough there especially concerning a few of his player reads that I also share and also his suspicion of Damo.

What specifically about it do you not find decent?

What am I missing about Damo that makes him so much of a town read for you?

Honest self assessment: would you like my post less if it weren't complimentary of you?