M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25703
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#461 Post by brainbomb » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:39 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:37 pm
brainbomb wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:32 pm
Jamie,
When you think of lurkers and low participation; below what post total do you consider someone to be scummy?

If I were to vote a lurker here who do you most suspect is mafia?
It depends on the overall level of activity in any given game.

Lurking is not just low posting, it's low posting whilst also seeming to have an eye on the game.

As to question 2:
Worcej, Lfischl, maybe Eden.
So you think chaqa is telling the truth about why hes unable to play much? I know he recently has had storm damage but most phones nowadays function without a wifi connection by just using cellular data.

Chaqa lurking is quite normal even without a chaotic situation.

Right?
What can I say? I'm survivin'
Crawling out these sheets to see another day

User avatar
FlaviusAetius
Posts: 4373
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#462 Post by FlaviusAetius » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:40 pm

damo666 wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:35 am
Jamie is town.

Sweet is town and is cleverly setting himself up to be the sacrificial N1 kill. Great town play. Be wise. Good luck.
I want to hear SWEET say this, you explained it that sounds like a good reason but I dont think its SWEET's reason because SWEET didn't say it FIRST. Instead he chose to double and triple down

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#463 Post by Jamiet99uk » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:41 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:39 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:37 pm
brainbomb wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:32 pm
Jamie,
When you think of lurkers and low participation; below what post total do you consider someone to be scummy?

If I were to vote a lurker here who do you most suspect is mafia?
It depends on the overall level of activity in any given game.

Lurking is not just low posting, it's low posting whilst also seeming to have an eye on the game.

As to question 2:
Worcej, Lfischl, maybe Eden.
So you think chaqa is telling the truth about why hes unable to play much? I know he recently has had storm damage but most phones nowadays function without a wifi connection by just using cellular data.

Chaqa lurking is quite normal even without a chaotic situation.

Right?
You can vote Chaqa if you like. I'd leave him til tomorrow.
Potato, potato; potato.

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25703
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#464 Post by brainbomb » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:41 pm

And why would you leave chaqa til tomorrow?
What can I say? I'm survivin'
Crawling out these sheets to see another day

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#465 Post by Jamiet99uk » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:42 pm

FlaviusAetius wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:40 pm
damo666 wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:35 am
Jamie is town.

Sweet is town and is cleverly setting himself up to be the sacrificial N1 kill. Great town play. Be wise. Good luck.
I want to hear SWEET say this, you explained it that sounds like a good reason but I dont think its SWEET's reason because SWEET didn't say it FIRST. Instead he chose to double and triple down
Ahem.

If Sweet is doing what Damo suggests then he would not admit it, and Damo should probably not have openly suggested it.

÷///&///#1.1
Potato, potato; potato.

President Eden
Posts: 7498
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
Location: possibly Britain
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#466 Post by President Eden » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:43 pm

Chaqa being absent here is 100% NAI. Bro has had himself a month of misery and is currently fighting a lack of Internet while balancing responsibilities as a new father.

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25703
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#467 Post by brainbomb » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:43 pm

What an incredibly kind and reasonable gesture to offer someone.

Would you also leave me til tomorrow if a tree falls on my house kind lad?
What can I say? I'm survivin'
Crawling out these sheets to see another day

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#468 Post by Jamiet99uk » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:43 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:41 pm
And why would you leave chaqa til tomorrow?
Because there ought to be better targets today.
Potato, potato; potato.

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25703
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#469 Post by brainbomb » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:44 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:43 pm
brainbomb wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:41 pm
And why would you leave chaqa til tomorrow?
Because there ought to be better targets today.
There ought to be or there actually are?
What can I say? I'm survivin'
Crawling out these sheets to see another day

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#470 Post by Jamiet99uk » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:44 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:43 pm
What an incredibly kind and reasonable gesture to offer someone.

Would you also leave me til tomorrow if a tree falls on my house kind lad?
Toppling a tree onto your house on purpose, to avoid being voted for, is exactly the kind of ploy I'd expect from you.
Potato, potato; potato.

President Eden
Posts: 7498
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
Location: possibly Britain
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#471 Post by President Eden » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:44 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:43 pm
What an incredibly kind and reasonable gesture to offer someone.

Would you also leave me til tomorrow if a tree falls on my house kind lad?
I think you’re town so it’s moot but hell yea brother

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#472 Post by rdrivera2005 » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:45 pm

Balki Bartokomous wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:08 pm
rdrivera2005 wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 3:54 pm
damo666 wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 2:05 pm
VTs do not know if they are VT or not. This would be bad play.

In fact it is bad play whatever so ##vote sweet.
Do you think scum is more likely to make bad plays then town?
I think that it would be wise to be less reliant on this "too scummy to be scum" defense.

Sweet's did not claim PR, he claimed "I am going to play in a way that is bad for Town."

That works as a scum play only because the prevailing view around here is: "too scummy to be scum." And it is a very easy ploy. It has also allowed him to avoid talking about alignments. He just keeps telling everyone how hard his claim is.
I am not saying it's a too scummy to be scum situation.

Damo stated he is voting Sweet because he was playing badly, not because it was too scummy.

You have a decent point about him avoiding meaningful discussions, but this have nothing to do with bad play. I think Damo's vote was opportunistic .

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#473 Post by Jamiet99uk » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:46 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:44 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:43 pm
brainbomb wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:41 pm
And why would you leave chaqa til tomorrow?
Because there ought to be better targets today.
There ought to be or there actually are?
Do you think that Chaqa is 100% the best kill today?

Then why not vote for him?

Rdrivera is already there.
Potato, potato; potato.

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 25703
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Larva
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#474 Post by brainbomb » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:46 pm

Well I gotta go, a Beoing 787 just crashed into my Tuff Shed. This is gonna take a while to clean this up. Better get off my wagon.
What can I say? I'm survivin'
Crawling out these sheets to see another day

damo666
Posts: 20273
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#475 Post by damo666 » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:46 pm

FlaviusAetius wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:40 pm
damo666 wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:35 am
Jamie is town.

Sweet is town and is cleverly setting himself up to be the sacrificial N1 kill. Great town play. Be wise. Good luck.
I want to hear SWEET say this, you explained it that sounds like a good reason but I dont think its SWEET's reason because SWEET didn't say it FIRST. Instead he chose to double and triple down
I no longer think this since we cannot have a D1 lawman

damo666
Posts: 20273
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#476 Post by damo666 » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:48 pm

@GM how is 4-3 a tie?

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#477 Post by Jamiet99uk » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:50 pm

damo666 wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:48 pm
@GM how is 4-3 a tie?
There are 3 votes on me, not 4.
Potato, potato; potato.

User avatar
dargorygel
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7168
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:55 pm
Location: Over the rainbow
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#478 Post by dargorygel » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:51 pm

damo666 wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:48 pm
@GM how is 4-3 a tie?
I do not know what you mean. My post says 3 votes CLEARLY for jamie. Not 4. Nope... not 4 at all.

User avatar
foodcoats
Posts: 5014
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:34 pm
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#479 Post by foodcoats » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:52 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 1:50 pm
foodcoats wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 1:40 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 1:36 pm


Why was sweetandcool DKed in M89?
A good part of why I scumread him (we were both town) was for fakeclaiming.
What did he claim?
When he was on the block, he claimed a role, and then later retracted the claim. He was a VT. In later discussions post-game sweet was quite adamant that he would be fakeclaiming as a matter of course in future games because he believes it is town optimal play.

User avatar
FlaviusAetius
Posts: 4373
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:15 am
Contact:

Re: M 90: Shootout at the Pretty Good Corral

#480 Post by FlaviusAetius » Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:53 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:53 am
FlaviusAetius wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 7:46 am
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Mon Jul 01, 2024 10:59 pm
Apparently questioning Sweet, even in jest, makes Bunny and Worcej immediately chainsaw me.

That's interesting.
well now IM questioning you for doing it in JEST??? Sweet did a seriously sus thing here and you are walking it back already not a good look
How am I walking anything back? What are you even talking about, Flav?
You suspected sweet for doing what he did by the fakeclaim(GOOD), but then the mintue people come onto you for doing so you back off(NOT GOOD)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat