M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
Yoyoyozo
Posts: 761
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 1:57 am
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4041 Post by Yoyoyozo » Sat Jun 08, 2024 2:53 am

Vig, if you shoot MadMonarch and claim, I'll believe that you're town aligned.

TheMadMonarch
Posts: 1995
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:24 am
Location: Probably not in your timezone (They/She)
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4042 Post by TheMadMonarch » Sat Jun 08, 2024 2:55 am

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Jun 07, 2024 5:04 pm
foodcoats wrote:
Fri Jun 07, 2024 5:01 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Jun 07, 2024 4:58 pm


I townread him as well.

What is your read on Ghug?
I have a hard time reading ghug at the best of times, and in this game it's even harder due to how much information needs to be parsed.

I don't feel he's the towniest, I'll tell ya that.
Do you know that Ghug is the third-highest poster in this game?

He has made 232 posts.

Yet I do not have a strong read on him either.

Perhaps this should concern us.

I am also concerned, on a related topic, that TheMadMonarch has posted only 11 times, and 10 of those posts were during the first half of D1.

@TheMadMonarch are you going to participate, please? You should sub out if you are unable to play.
👋

I've been reading since EOD2.

TheMadMonarch
Posts: 1995
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:24 am
Location: Probably not in your timezone (They/She)
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4043 Post by TheMadMonarch » Sat Jun 08, 2024 2:56 am

FlaviusAetius wrote:
Fri Jun 07, 2024 6:03 pm
sweetandcool wrote:
Fri Jun 07, 2024 12:06 am
It took Fox 33 minutes to make his meta case discrediting Balki.

Not impossible, but impressively speedy.

This supports the notion that Fox had it in his grudge folder. That is, this stuff from years ago was so seared in his mind he was able to find it relatively quickly, or he literally had some of this stuff saved or something.

Alternatively, it could be part of a coordinated plan with Balki.

Here I would post a detailed case, but not doing that this game probably.

I'm not impressed with Fox's day, and his love for voting Dip is :sick:

I think he is Mafia, but of course it's possible I'm wrong.

Then again, I'm 100% so far so maybe y'all will listen.
I said this before and I'll say it again I wont vote Fox until I see his spreadsheet. The longer he delays his spreadsheet giving the more I think he is a mafia. But we should still see the thing, EVERYONE should want to see it.
1. if you think he is mafia, then seeing this spreadsheet that is likely being workshopped by the mafia gives us keen insight into what their thinking
2. if you think he is town, then reading his reads are an important part of what would make the case for that
3. if you think he is NAI right now, then this is whats going to move you over the edge one way or the other
4. if you are fox then you talk about your spreadsheet so much, share us the results!
From memory, Fox works alone on his spreadsheet, then comes back with results. Don't mess with the process.

User avatar
Dousing
Posts: 653
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2022 1:37 am
Location: Canada (Canada Flag Emoji)
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4044 Post by Dousing » Sat Jun 08, 2024 2:57 am

Sup,

FWIW I wasn't tadpoled/in any way... ["Hey Siri, what are some synonyms for messed with?"] /in any way interfered. manhandled. mucked (about or around) butted in or meddled.


Tbh, idk how useful this mass claim is? Anyone who sucks the tadpole won't claim it and anyone who doesn't suck the tadpole would probably say smt imho.

Bunny suggested this right? Could this be busywork from Bunny to gain a false sense of towniness?

TheMadMonarch
Posts: 1995
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:24 am
Location: Probably not in your timezone (They/She)
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4045 Post by TheMadMonarch » Sat Jun 08, 2024 2:58 am

BunnyGo wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 12:48 am
Vecna wrote:
Fri Jun 07, 2024 9:13 pm
sweetandcool wrote:
Fri Jun 07, 2024 9:11 pm
##DESTROY
unless this is a claim, its probably more sensible to just have the receiver claim it.
Actually that’s a great idea.

Case 1) someone was saved or invincible last night. They should claim they were doc saved.

Case 2) someone was given the tadpole. They should claim it ASAP.

Case 3) everyone else: knows they were not targeted with either. Scum already knows it to.

We claim RIGHT NOW to force.

I had nothing happen to me last night. No tadpole. No attack.
I did not get tadpoled or nothin'


I do want to ask the question though, why are we asking this? Why wouldn't the 'poled person lie? Or even say they rejected? What does this achieve?

TheMadMonarch
Posts: 1995
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:24 am
Location: Probably not in your timezone (They/She)
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4046 Post by TheMadMonarch » Sat Jun 08, 2024 2:58 am

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Fri Jun 07, 2024 10:43 pm
worcej wrote:
Fri Jun 07, 2024 10:39 pm
I probably missed this or it was screamed to not be discussed, but do we think the vig shot was from scum?
It has been debated. Yoyo certainly thinks it was a scum shot, and Vecna appears to agree.

Flavius and I discussed the fact it was more likely to be town, because Damo was already a leading wagon when he was shot - therefore why wouldn't scum save the vig shot to use on someone else, and just allow the town to miskill Damo?
Maybe the vig wanted some town cred for down the line?

User avatar
foodcoats
Posts: 5014
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:34 pm
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4047 Post by foodcoats » Sat Jun 08, 2024 2:58 am

I kinda like DemonRHK on re-read, though I like Squig’s catch on yoyo enough to think Demon is wrongvoting yoyo here.

TheMadMonarch
Posts: 1995
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:24 am
Location: Probably not in your timezone (They/She)
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4048 Post by TheMadMonarch » Sat Jun 08, 2024 2:59 am

Yoyoyozo wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 2:53 am
Vig, if you shoot MadMonarch and claim, I'll believe that you're town aligned.
Rude.

TheMadMonarch
Posts: 1995
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:24 am
Location: Probably not in your timezone (They/She)
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4049 Post by TheMadMonarch » Sat Jun 08, 2024 3:00 am

I think the people going after bunny for not noticing the 3 deaths are insane. Even before all his excuses of paying attention to other things, if you happened to scroll down enough to see the first line but not further, why would you think to do more?

maybe scum indicitive to be having a go and talking about meaningless shit, to make it seem like you're helping.

User avatar
foodcoats
Posts: 5014
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:34 pm
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4050 Post by foodcoats » Sat Jun 08, 2024 3:01 am

Dousing wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 2:57 am
Sup,

FWIW I wasn't tadpoled/in any way... ["Hey Siri, what are some synonyms for messed with?"] /in any way interfered. manhandled. mucked (about or around) butted in or meddled.


Tbh, idk how useful this mass claim is? Anyone who sucks the tadpole won't claim it and anyone who doesn't suck the tadpole would probably say smt imho.

Bunny suggested this right? Could this be busywork from Bunny to gain a false sense of towniness?
Yeah I think there’s something there, also with the thing sweet pointed out about “checked the last flip on the bot” which sweet towns but sounds over constructed to me.

##VOTE BunnyGo

sweetandcool
Posts: 4890
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 8:21 pm
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4051 Post by sweetandcool » Sat Jun 08, 2024 3:02 am

TheMadMonarch wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 2:58 am
BunnyGo wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 12:48 am
Vecna wrote:
Fri Jun 07, 2024 9:13 pm


unless this is a claim, its probably more sensible to just have the receiver claim it.
Actually that’s a great idea.

Case 1) someone was saved or invincible last night. They should claim they were doc saved.

Case 2) someone was given the tadpole. They should claim it ASAP.

Case 3) everyone else: knows they were not targeted with either. Scum already knows it to.

We claim RIGHT NOW to force.

I had nothing happen to me last night. No tadpole. No attack.
I did not get tadpoled or nothin'


I do want to ask the question though, why are we asking this? Why wouldn't the 'poled person lie? Or even say they rejected? What does this achieve?
The point is we really want to know if anyone will report anything else. If no doc saves or etc. are reported, then we know someone is tadpoled.

Obviously we don't expect a tadpole claim, except possibly to declare they destroyed it.

User avatar
foodcoats
Posts: 5014
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:34 pm
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4052 Post by foodcoats » Sat Jun 08, 2024 3:03 am

sweetandcool wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 3:02 am
TheMadMonarch wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 2:58 am
BunnyGo wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 12:48 am


Actually that’s a great idea.

Case 1) someone was saved or invincible last night. They should claim they were doc saved.

Case 2) someone was given the tadpole. They should claim it ASAP.

Case 3) everyone else: knows they were not targeted with either. Scum already knows it to.

We claim RIGHT NOW to force.

I had nothing happen to me last night. No tadpole. No attack.
I did not get tadpoled or nothin'


I do want to ask the question though, why are we asking this? Why wouldn't the 'poled person lie? Or even say they rejected? What does this achieve?
The point is we really want to know if anyone will report anything else. If no doc saves or etc. are reported, then we know someone is tadpoled.

Obviously we don't expect a tadpole claim, except possibly to declare they destroyed it.
Oh yeah duh
Errmmm

##VOTE Bona

TheMadMonarch
Posts: 1995
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:24 am
Location: Probably not in your timezone (They/She)
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4053 Post by TheMadMonarch » Sat Jun 08, 2024 3:04 am

In terms of the missing kill. I'm inclined to think it was a save/RB.

If I was a mafioso, I'd push for a later tadpole. The earlier you nab someone, the greater chance they die. Also allows you to get some "townclears".

TheMadMonarch
Posts: 1995
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:24 am
Location: Probably not in your timezone (They/She)
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4054 Post by TheMadMonarch » Sat Jun 08, 2024 3:05 am

Speaking of "town clears", if there was a tadpole, I think we should look towards people we trust (i.e. squiggs).

TheMadMonarch
Posts: 1995
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:24 am
Location: Probably not in your timezone (They/She)
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4055 Post by TheMadMonarch » Sat Jun 08, 2024 3:06 am

sweetandcool wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 3:02 am
TheMadMonarch wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 2:58 am
BunnyGo wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 12:48 am


Actually that’s a great idea.

Case 1) someone was saved or invincible last night. They should claim they were doc saved.

Case 2) someone was given the tadpole. They should claim it ASAP.

Case 3) everyone else: knows they were not targeted with either. Scum already knows it to.

We claim RIGHT NOW to force.

I had nothing happen to me last night. No tadpole. No attack.
I did not get tadpoled or nothin'


I do want to ask the question though, why are we asking this? Why wouldn't the 'poled person lie? Or even say they rejected? What does this achieve?
The point is we really want to know if anyone will report anything else. If no doc saves or etc. are reported, then we know someone is tadpoled.

Obviously we don't expect a tadpole claim, except possibly to declare they destroyed it.
hmmm.... I suppose


#CALL GM

You know if you're doc saved?
Does your doc know?
If you RB the mafia kill, do you get to know?

TheMadMonarch
Posts: 1995
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:24 am
Location: Probably not in your timezone (They/She)
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4056 Post by TheMadMonarch » Sat Jun 08, 2024 3:07 am

##VOTE ghug

I've just got a gut feeling about him.

I don't have a ton else, due to not having read half the thread 😁

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4057 Post by Foxcastle » Sat Jun 08, 2024 3:08 am

FlaviusAetius wrote:
Fri Jun 07, 2024 6:03 pm
sweetandcool wrote:
Fri Jun 07, 2024 12:06 am
It took Fox 33 minutes to make his meta case discrediting Balki.

Not impossible, but impressively speedy.

This supports the notion that Fox had it in his grudge folder. That is, this stuff from years ago was so seared in his mind he was able to find it relatively quickly, or he literally had some of this stuff saved or something.

Alternatively, it could be part of a coordinated plan with Balki.

Here I would post a detailed case, but not doing that this game probably.

I'm not impressed with Fox's day, and his love for voting Dip is :sick:

I think he is Mafia, but of course it's possible I'm wrong.

Then again, I'm 100% so far so maybe y'all will listen.
I said this before and I'll say it again I wont vote Fox until I see his spreadsheet. The longer he delays his spreadsheet giving the more I think he is a mafia. But we should still see the thing, EVERYONE should want to see it.
1. if you think he is mafia, then seeing this spreadsheet that is likely being workshopped by the mafia gives us keen insight into what their thinking
2. if you think he is town, then reading his reads are an important part of what would make the case for that
3. if you think he is NAI right now, then this is whats going to move you over the edge one way or the other
4. if you are fox then you talk about your spreadsheet so much, share us the results!
Oh, I missed this on catchup, sorry.

You'll never see the spreadsheet. It only works if scum don't know what I'm looking for in terms of deciding that two players can't be scum together.

Also, FWIW, I'm not doing a spreadsheet for this game. (Well, not yet anyway, it's much more useful later on.) I mean, sure, I've heavily implied that, and maybe I even said it, but mostly, I'm just enjoying how much it's become a Thing.

TheMadMonarch
Posts: 1995
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:24 am
Location: Probably not in your timezone (They/She)
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4058 Post by TheMadMonarch » Sat Jun 08, 2024 3:09 am

People complain about my emoji use, and how it makes bot reading difficult. That's just making me do it more.

Don't be a coward and read the game for real. Join the "online" status club. Invisible is for losers. 😝

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4059 Post by Foxcastle » Sat Jun 08, 2024 3:11 am

TheMadMonarch wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 3:05 am
Speaking of "town clears", if there was a tadpole, I think we should look towards people we trust (i.e. squiggs).
This probably ends up relying too much on meta, but one thing that has to be considered (by mafia and by town trying to figure it out) is whether someone would accept. I don't think Squiggs or Jamie would accept, for example.

Yoyoyozo
Posts: 761
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 1:57 am
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Contact:

Re: M89: Baldurs Gate Mafia Game Thread

#4060 Post by Yoyoyozo » Sat Jun 08, 2024 3:13 am

TheMadMonarch wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2024 3:07 am
##VOTE ghug

I've just got a gut feeling about him.

I don't have a ton else, due to not having read half the thread 😁
##VOTE MadMonarch

Your rapid succession of posts seem prepared. How are you replying to posts that are hours apart in a few minutes, jumping back and forth in time, etc.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], brainbomb, Hominidae, Jamiet99uk, Spartaculous