A1. our relationship does not have to be exhausting just because I think you are a mafiaFlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07, 2024 6:33 pmAGREED! But it seems like his argument is false now, though he still had good reasons for ghug soo and here's my response to you @ghug
https://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/posting.php?mode=quote&f=4&p=407226
Ok I'm back to thinking Flavius is town, and also back to thinking our relationship is going to be exhausting.
1. "I say stuff not designed to look good." not "I say stuff designed to not look good." there's an important difference.
2. I was not being buddy buddy with Vecna. I noted that we agreed and sweet ran with it, which is weird but I'm struggling to find scum motivation.
3. Your contradiction contradicts itself.
4. Has anyone agreed with Kak's meta read yet?
A2. also why do you think Im a town you cant just say that, arent you one of the people who are against naked reads? quoting something does not make it not a naked read
B1. there is no difference Im going to need you to explain it to me
B2. and you didnt push back against it until I brought it up thats the problem! Remember how Squiggs said you always pocket him? Then I said well he would know that so he wouldnt do it this time around. Well it looks like we found who you have started pocketing, Vecna!
B3. If there's a contradiction in what I said that is exactly what Im saying you dont make sense if you are a townie according to your meta
B4. That's odd isn't it, that NO ONE has commented on it?
V the contradiction I put forward V
"You saying this scummy thing is exactly the contradiction I put forward that you did
"So either your a big solver and thats unlike your town meta
Or you are a solver, and you all of a sudden dont want to solve until day 4""
[/quote]
I have no idea where the commentary and where the quote is.