Cultafia Game Thread

[Squigs44]

And suddenly I'm the only one on Bozo. Guys, his play has been pathetic. Bozo is so much better at the game than this. He usually posts much more analysis, and puts out reads.

[Squigs44]

Also, no one is on Damo right now, and I think his play has actually been more pathetic than Bozos. Anyone up for a damo lynch since the Bozo wagon dissipated?

[brainbomb]

Nope

[brainbomb]

Im rooting to be converted at this point.

[brainbomb]

This towns pathetically lost chasing ghosts. Not listening to me. Id love to be in the cult at this point and just kick back loving the chaos

[Squigs44]

This towns pathetically lost chasing ghosts. Not listening to me. Id love to be in the cult at this point and just kick back loving the chaos

Lol if you are actually cult leader.

[Squigs44]

This towns pathetically lost chasing ghosts. Not listening to me. Id love to be in the cult at this point and just kick back loving the chaos

So you want us all to listen to you and just vote Yav? I think his play has been much more active than last game. He feels more like tiny hunt Yav than last game to me.

[DemonRHK]

I'm more interested in brain calling out squigs for angleshooting as playing counter to wincon and then somewhat doing the same, running the same 'convert me' angle as the person he's voting for. What the fuck.

[Jamiet99uk]

@Brainbomb:

DurgaRHK's analysis appears right to me.

As DRHK has said, but just to summarise, in the course of a *single* post, ChippeRock:

1. Accused me of being scum for, he claimed, jumping on Squiggs because it was "an easy wagon" (ignoring the fact that I created and pushed that wagon),

2. Declared that he scumread Squigs himself.

So, ChippeRock, you think I'm scum for hopping onto the easy mislynch of someone...that...you....uuhhh.....claim to scumread

If he *actually* scumreads both me and Squigs in that situation, he would accuse me of bussing my scum-mate, but you'll notice he didn't actually do that. Therefore we can conclude that either (a) one or both of his stated scumreads is insincere, or (b) he knows that one of me or Squigs is not scum.

If it's (a) that's fairly scummy, and if it's (b) he's scum for sure.

##VOTE CHIPPEROCK

Please actually respond to this rather than just brushing it off?

[Jamiet99uk]

Moreover, when questioned by DRHK, Chippe claimed he had been scumreading me and Squigs at different times.

This was incorrect and looks like back-pedalling.

He scumread us both IN THE SAME POST, and then denied it.

Tell me this isn't scummy?

Youre scumreading him for not accusing you of bussing -simply because he has you both as scum-.

No, I'm scumreading him for accusing me of going for an easy mislynch by voting for Squiggs, when he *also* said he scumread Squigs in the same post!

The failure to accuse me of bussing despute me voting someone he thinks is my scum-mate is just the icing on the cake.

[Jamiet99uk]

How can Squigs be both scum himself AND an easy mislynch for scum to push?

[brainbomb]

@Brainbomb:

DurgaRHK's analysis appears right to me.

As DRHK has said, but just to summarise, in the course of a *single* post, ChippeRock:

1. Accused me of being scum for, he claimed, jumping on Squiggs because it was "an easy wagon" (ignoring the fact that I created and pushed that wagon),

2. Declared that he scumread Squigs himself.

So, ChippeRock, you think I'm scum for hopping onto the easy mislynch of someone...that...you....uuhhh.....claim to scumread

If he *actually* scumreads both me and Squigs in that situation, he would accuse me of bussing my scum-mate, but you'll notice he didn't actually do that. Therefore we can conclude that either (a) one or both of his stated scumreads is insincere, or (b) he knows that one of me or Squigs is not scum.

If it's (a) that's fairly scummy, and if it's (b) he's scum for sure.

##VOTE CHIPPEROCK

Please actually respond to this rather than just brushing it off?

I see you getting hung up on semantics as usual. Is there something Im supposed to see here?

[brainbomb]

How can Squigs be both scum himself AND an easy mislynch for scum to push?

Because hes probably an idiot. I didnt say it made sense I just think hes town

[Jamiet99uk]

@Brainbomb:

DurgaRHK's analysis appears right to me.

As DRHK has said, but just to summarise, in the course of a *single* post, ChippeRock:

1. Accused me of being scum for, he claimed, jumping on Squiggs because it was "an easy wagon" (ignoring the fact that I created and pushed that wagon),

2. Declared that he scumread Squigs himself.

So, ChippeRock, you think I'm scum for hopping onto the easy mislynch of someone...that...you....uuhhh.....claim to scumread

If he *actually* scumreads both me and Squigs in that situation, he would accuse me of bussing my scum-mate, but you'll notice he didn't actually do that. Therefore we can conclude that either (a) one or both of his stated scumreads is insincere, or (b) he knows that one of me or Squigs is not scum.

If it's (a) that's fairly scummy, and if it's (b) he's scum for sure.

##VOTE CHIPPEROCK

Please actually respond to this rather than just brushing it off?

I see you getting hung up on semantics as usual. Is there something Im supposed to see here?

For the love of fuck, yes. He said I'm scum because I'm pushing an easy mislynch. He also said he scumreads the person I'm pushing. How can both of those things be genuine?

[brainbomb]

Oh. Well thats a valid point.

@chippee how can squiggs be an easy mislynch and Jamies partner?

[Jamiet99uk]

This is nothing to do with semantics and everything to do with someone making totally conflicting claims within a single post - and then, when challenged, trying to change his story, backpedalling.

[brainbomb]

Ok
##Vote chippee

[brainbomb]

Town are more likely to trip over their words jamie.

[brainbomb]

Scum reread their posts several times before posting to avoid logic conundrums

[Jamiet99uk]

Town are more likely to trip over their words jamie.

This is not about tripping over words.