Mafia 86: Accidents Happen... - Game Thread

[Frogsterking]

here's where I'm at

Town Gang
brainbomb
BunnyGo
Jamie

Scum Gang
Bozo
Damo
Will

Sneaky Null Gang
foodcoats
Frogsterking
ghug
Hamilton Brian
heartthrob24909
sweetandcool
Vecna

I think I've explained the non-null reads in my postings, but I can elaborate if needed.

I will not vote Bunny, food, or sweet today.

I'm not really seeing any reason to vote Hamilton either.

Chaqa essentially said he would not vote for any of his counter wagons except damo, despite specifically not town reading Hamilton and sweetandcool an hour earlier.

If you read all of my posts, I was skeptical of the lack of cases on sweet and Hamilton. I’m still not sure how we caught them besides dumb luck

Skeptical of lack of cases sounds different from last game I guess

[Frogsterking]

I'll be on for a bit as I catch up. Sorry for the absence, tonight's city council meeting was a long one.

To the GT:

That last sentence is such a good teaser. I really want to hear more about the meeting.

So the city I live in has a historic downtown from the 1700s that is soon to be a World Heritage site. There is a massive, ugly parking garage next to it that is currently being demolished due to it being 50 years old and falling apart. The city has been working to replace it so that we only miss one Christmas season (big part of the local economy, we're called "The Christmas City")

As part of this, the Historical Architecture Review Board was consulted, and they basically have been rejecting any proposal that is not rebuilding the garage exactly as before. This is ostensibly because of historic reasons, but many of us and the majority of the City Council rightly argue that no parking garage can be historic, and that the HARB is acting in bad faith as they did not provide any comments on anything except "we will only accept a garage on the same footprint rebuilt in kind"

They are hyper focused on the fact that the old garage, which is literally a block large (back in the 70s it displaced 40 low income homes to be built, but HARB didnt bitch then, did they - wonder why?), will be smaller and taller by a few feet, and that a portion of the old site may be used for some other purpose. As such, the plan is to subdivide the lot and leave the other bit empty. In the mocks, the designers simply put a white box placeholder, which all of us with non-lead poisoned brains understood to be just that.

There's been literally dozens of hours of informative presentations on this, yet these NIMBYs are saying the process hasn't been transparent and have been basically conspiratorial in their beliefs that there's (to quote a fellow resident) "a secret cabal of city officials trying to sneak something nefarious into the white box"

This has been probably the biggest drama in the city in awhile, with a bunch of people carrying signs saying "Support HARB". Not to be crass, but every single one of these people is over the age of 50. They cry about the city's future while actively trying to repeat the mistakes of the past.

[dargorygel]

To the GT:

That last sentence is such a good teaser. I really want to hear more about the meeting.

So the city I live in has a historic downtown from the 1700s that is soon to be a World Heritage site. There is a massive, ugly parking garage next to it that is currently being demolished due to it being 50 years old and falling apart. The city has been working to replace it so that we only miss one Christmas season (big part of the local economy, we're called "The Christmas City")

As part of this, the Historical Architecture Review Board was consulted, and they basically have been rejecting any proposal that is not rebuilding the garage exactly as before. This is ostensibly because of historic reasons, but many of us and the majority of the City Council rightly argue that no parking garage can be historic, and that the HARB is acting in bad faith as they did not provide any comments on anything except "we will only accept a garage on the same footprint rebuilt in kind"

They are hyper focused on the fact that the old garage, which is literally a block large (back in the 70s it displaced 40 low income homes to be built, but HARB didnt bitch then, did they - wonder why?), will be smaller and taller by a few feet, and that a portion of the old site may be used for some other purpose. As such, the plan is to subdivide the lot and leave the other bit empty. In the mocks, the designers simply put a white box placeholder, which all of us with non-lead poisoned brains understood to be just that.

There's been literally dozens of hours of informative presentations on this, yet these NIMBYs are saying the process hasn't been transparent and have been basically conspiratorial in their beliefs that there's (to quote a fellow resident) "a secret cabal of city officials trying to sneak something nefarious into the white box"

This has been probably the biggest drama in the city in awhile, with a bunch of people carrying signs saying "Support HARB". Not to be crass, but every single one of these people is over the age of 50. They cry about the city's future while actively trying to repeat the mistakes of the past.

What's your point, frog? Why repost this?

[Frogsterking]

Well I'm biased to think it's chaqa because then my D2 is a lot better

[Frogsterking]

So the city I live in has a historic downtown from the 1700s that is soon to be a World Heritage site. There is a massive, ugly parking garage next to it that is currently being demolished due to it being 50 years old and falling apart. The city has been working to replace it so that we only miss one Christmas season (big part of the local economy, we're called "The Christmas City")

As part of this, the Historical Architecture Review Board was consulted, and they basically have been rejecting any proposal that is not rebuilding the garage exactly as before. This is ostensibly because of historic reasons, but many of us and the majority of the City Council rightly argue that no parking garage can be historic, and that the HARB is acting in bad faith as they did not provide any comments on anything except "we will only accept a garage on the same footprint rebuilt in kind"

They are hyper focused on the fact that the old garage, which is literally a block large (back in the 70s it displaced 40 low income homes to be built, but HARB didnt bitch then, did they - wonder why?), will be smaller and taller by a few feet, and that a portion of the old site may be used for some other purpose. As such, the plan is to subdivide the lot and leave the other bit empty. In the mocks, the designers simply put a white box placeholder, which all of us with non-lead poisoned brains understood to be just that.

There's been literally dozens of hours of informative presentations on this, yet these NIMBYs are saying the process hasn't been transparent and have been basically conspiratorial in their beliefs that there's (to quote a fellow resident) "a secret cabal of city officials trying to sneak something nefarious into the white box"

This has been probably the biggest drama in the city in awhile, with a bunch of people carrying signs saying "Support HARB". Not to be crass, but every single one of these people is over the age of 50. They cry about the city's future while actively trying to repeat the mistakes of the past.

What's your point, frog? Why repost this?

It's potentially scummy

[brainbomb]

i am not a PR as shouldve been very obvious by my guilty guilty guilty claims. I would not do that as the doc.

[brainbomb]

##vote will as he was looking for PR crumbs which is not something town usually do

[Frogsterking]

It's potentially scummy in concurrence with what someone observed recently:

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

NIMBYs? What’s that?

[BunnyGo]

What's your point, frog? Why repost this?

It's potentially scummy

why? He answered my question for more information?

[brainbomb]

Id consider frog but prefer will.

Chaqa offering to die is probably bad also but im buying the sentiment in the situation

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

##vote will as he was looking for PR crumbs which is not something town usually do

…yes it is? Don’t want inv getting DKed. And I wouldve killed him???

[BunnyGo]

##vote will as he was looking for PR crumbs which is not something town usually do

##vote just

I thought HE was the cop. It was the reason I was protecting him.

[JustAGuyNamedWill]

##vote will as he was looking for PR crumbs which is not something town usually do

##vote just

I thought HE was the cop. It was the reason I was protecting him.

I’m… not the cop? When did I say that?

[BunnyGo]

i am not a PR as shouldve been very obvious by my guilty guilty guilty claims. I would not do that as the doc.

why claim this?

[BunnyGo]

##vote will as he was looking for PR crumbs which is not something town usually do

##vote just

I thought HE was the cop. It was the reason I was protecting him.

no...I thought he was town for many other reasons.

##unvote

[BunnyGo]

##vote ghug

[dargorygel]

I could easily vote for Just, foods, or froggy... and maybe chaqa.
I joined the frog wagon because I didn't want to start a vanity wagon.
But I will go with my most scummy scummypants on my list and see what happens. I am happy to consolidate if needed.

##VOTE FOOD

(the PR claim... particularly the LONG WAIT to announce it...)

[BunnyGo]

##vote ghug

would consider a damo vote, or a brain vote.

I think froggy needs to show us his thoughts more, but his day 1 vote gets him one more reprieve.

[dargorygel]

##vote ghug

would consider a damo vote, or a brain vote.

I think froggy needs to show us his thoughts more, but his day 1 vote gets him one more reprieve.

I get that...
damo is ALMOST on my list. Today he has reprieved himself for me, a bit.