Nah.
I plan to use my night action on brainbomb.
#1641 Post by Chaqa » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:02 pm
Nah.
#1642 Post by brainbomb » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:02 pm
#1643 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:03 pm
What are you talking about?BunnyGo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:28 pmWhy doesn’t your post facto explanation match your stated goals? You have ascribed competing goals and narrative to your action. I have paid this out both with clearly stated logic which you’ve ignored and more emotional ways. You’ve responded with ad hominem attacks.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:52 pmBabySpice voted with around 1 minute to go until the deadline. Until that vote was cast there was no tie to break. I had a choice between acting at the very last second, or not acting at all.BobMcBob wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:45 pm
I'm gonna be honest, I seriously considered doing option 2, but not option 1 because I was overthinking the wagon crossing thing. But it is a weird explanation given his vote move was at the very last second (actually after it according to the bot) so moving anywhere else would've achieved the exact same thing.
It is both of you who are being weird by suggesting that I had some pre-meditated plan.
I would not be surprised if one of you is scum trying to create noise and smoke in the thread by getting me annoyed. BunnyGo has history of doing that; you are apparently just a naturally annoying person, Bob. So I wonder which of you it is.
Wherefor Jamie?
#1644 Post by Chaqa » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:04 pm
I don't want to choose someone I strongly townread in case I have a negative effect. I plan to choose brain because he's the highest volume poster.foodcoats wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:36 pmFor tonight, what specific value do you believe there is in choosing a target versus having a target randomly assigned?Chaqa wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 3:11 amStop using logic against me. Your jedi mind tricks won't work.foodcoats wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:50 am
The most important thing to consider, in my opinion, is that we can’t draw any meaningful clues from our returns without cross-referencing to other claimed returns. If we don’t claim, we basically throw away our powers. I suspect scum will not throw away theirs!
I think that if we don’t all claim, we make it harder for ALL town players to fully understand the meaning of their powers (consider getting a “town” return in isolation; who are you and what do you know?). Whoever does not claim actively deprives others of the fun of their role - and deprives themselves of the chance to learn valuable information and contribute to a shared Team Town victory!
Also, given that scum aren’t all vanilla goons, we are extra pooched if we don’t try to use our powers!
I see what you're saying. It will be difficult to know what results mean without collective results. I guess I mostly disagree with losing my choice of target.
#1645 Post by brainbomb » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:04 pm
#1646 Post by Chaqa » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:04 pm
That depends on the scum themselves. Different teams will have idealogical differences.foodcoats wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:37 pmYou smell nice either way - you have a dog it seems and I like how dogs smell!
But what do you think scum would prefer? Town mass claim or no town mass claim?
#1647 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:05 pm
Not the same thing.brainbomb wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:52 pmWell if this isnt the most ironic thing ive ever seen.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 11:44 amSorry if I seem tetchy but you're doing Bob's thing where you ask a question about a single post in isolation even though that post is very obviously one part of a conversation. It's annoying because it requires redundant extra posts to answer even though the context was already plainly available.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 11:35 am
I literally moved my vote to avoid a tie.
The question Brainbomb and Sweet were speculating about was why I preferred to move to Lfischl rather than JustWill. So I commented on that.
You are skimming quickly and asking questions that you could see the answers to if you slowed down and looked at the context.
#1649 Post by brainbomb » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:07 pm
I expect people to do some leg work and have a basic modicum of making logical inferences. something you consistently fail to do after 8 years of playing the game. if it isnt spelled out in bloody detail for you with diagrams, pictures, graphs and quotes you become this wookie in the thread flailing around about how everything is so confusing.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:05 pmNot the same thing.brainbomb wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:52 pmWell if this isnt the most ironic thing ive ever seen.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 11:44 am
Sorry if I seem tetchy but you're doing Bob's thing where you ask a question about a single post in isolation even though that post is very obviously one part of a conversation. It's annoying because it requires redundant extra posts to answer even though the context was already plainly available.
I am saying that in the case of Bunny's present nonsense, he was focusing on my post and ignoring the conversation.
You, meanwhile, often expect people to read your mind. I would rather not delve into that swamp.
#1650 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:09 pm
Even if said scheme obviously benefits town.Chaqa wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:58 pmOr people who want to actually make their own choices with their roles and not be forced into some scheme.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 10:22 amThey are a combination of obstinate morons and/or scum.
#1651 Post by brainbomb » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:11 pm
#1652 Post by foodcoats » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:11 pm
When I looked at the bot it was sweet 4 Bob 2 and I was comfortable with both wagons so I wanted to see what might occur by tying them to give future VCA.
#1653 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:12 pm
I assume this refers to me.brainbomb wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:04 pmthe specific reason for you refusing to cast a vote on the lead wagon would be that multiple scum partners of yours are already on said wagon --- or that No scum are on said wagon and you wanted to keep it that way.
those are examples of why you could be mafia and deliberately avoided casting a meaningful vote.
#1654 Post by Chaqa » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:12 pm
Who is this directed at?brainbomb wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:04 pmthe specific reason for you refusing to cast a vote on the lead wagon would be that multiple scum partners of yours are already on said wagon --- or that No scum are on said wagon and you wanted to keep it that way.
those are examples of why you could be mafia and deliberately avoided casting a meaningful vote.
#1655 Post by foodcoats » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:13 pm
Democracy isn’t fool proof. Do you prefer dictatorship?Kakarroto wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:19 pmAssuming we ALL chose to participate in the directed PR system:
Plus assuming there will be no roleblocks for town because curfew enforcer hits sicko (I first thought they would act in the same phase but it turns out the curfew enforcer is faster so there is a chance that mafia RB is town RB'ed), PLUS assuming NK is saved by doc:
openly towncleared:
news host (+gets info on their target out)
openly towncleared if target claims:
paper delivery boy
door darter
openly towncleared if no counter claim or copy from mail man:
a) private investigator
a) middle manager (plus two info that needs sorting but that can be done)
b) detective
b) internal affairs
b) electoral comission officer (plus two useful info that needs more sorting since one useless info is mixed in)
c) ruber driver
c) pollster
outs the sicko if docsave is one of the above and if lobbyist finds out their role with no further claims of success/failure:
curfew enforcer
depending on the role/alignment of the target, a few more peeps are outed. That would be a pretty fast game for town.
but this is the best case scenario. We shouldn't expect that to happen.
===============
Assuming two town don't participate in the directed PR system:
Plus assuming sicko RB's a town role (randomly) plus assuming curfew enforcer doesn't hit sicko, plus no doc save:
random chance for town roles not to participate:
roll 9 (hits ECO)
roll 10 (hits middle manager)
random chance for sicko to hit town:
roll 14 (hits lobbyist)
random chance for curfew enforcer to hit:
roll 19 (hits lobbyist too, what are the chances)
random chance for mafia to hit:
roll 7 (hits mail man)
openly towncleared:
news host (+gets info on their target out)
three people claim alignment return:
looks good but one mafia is hiding unknowingly to town since ECO didn't participate
two people claim role return:
looks good but one mafia is hiding unknowingly to town since middle manager didn't participate
two people claiming target:
appears to be town and are actual both town but might cause shade if one of the upper two tiers flip mafia
a bunch of successful/failure claims (including doc, lobbyist and some fake claims)
after EoD people know that lobbyist was rb'ed though
so with that scenario, there seemed to be quite the chance of misinformation happening and mafia hiding while getting to know some good detective/private detective
So it seems to me, the directed system isn't fool proof, especially when not every town participates.
any thoughts?
#1656 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:13 pm
My brain works the way my brain works. I cannot change the functioning of my brain to suit your particular neuro-divergences. Get over it.brainbomb wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:07 pmI expect people to do some leg work and have a basic modicum of making logical inferences. something you consistently fail to do after 8 years of playing the game. if it isnt spelled out in bloody detail for you with diagrams, pictures, graphs and quotes you become this wookie in the thread flailing around about how everything is so confusing.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:05 pmNot the same thing.
I am saying that in the case of Bunny's present nonsense, he was focusing on my post and ignoring the conversation.
You, meanwhile, often expect people to read your mind. I would rather not delve into that swamp.
#1657 Post by brainbomb » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:13 pm
Maybe you should read this again and respond to the scenarios where you did this because youre mafia. And discuss if you agree with those being possible things you would have done if you were mafiaJamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:12 pmI assume this refers to me.brainbomb wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:04 pmthe specific reason for you refusing to cast a vote on the lead wagon would be that multiple scum partners of yours are already on said wagon --- or that No scum are on said wagon and you wanted to keep it that way.
those are examples of why you could be mafia and deliberately avoided casting a meaningful vote.
My vote was extremely meaningful because it prevented a tie. I had to make a split-second decision. Clearly I should not have bothered. I will not seek to break ties in future, I am learning my lesson, thank you.
#1658 Post by brainbomb » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:14 pm
JamieChaqa wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:12 pmWho is this directed at?brainbomb wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:04 pmthe specific reason for you refusing to cast a vote on the lead wagon would be that multiple scum partners of yours are already on said wagon --- or that No scum are on said wagon and you wanted to keep it that way.
those are examples of why you could be mafia and deliberately avoided casting a meaningful vote.
#1659 Post by Jamiet99uk » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:14 pm
Why are we talking about shooting again?brainbomb wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:11 pmChaqa, you mentioned the two most net negative outcomes possible for me. that I come back as guilty, or that you shoot me. Is that the extent of how you view my play so far - that I am so anti town and so loud that I could only either be mafia, or deserving of just dying?
I guess I find that really surprising, or is it just purely you dislike top posting players and want the game to be smaller?
#1660 Post by Chaqa » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:14 pm
I think my thoughts were more on focusing on someone with a high potential for townplay but also a high potential for scumspam. Resolving that seems prudent when we have a roster capaable of 50 pages per day.brainbomb wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:11 pmChaqa, you mentioned the two most net negative outcomes possible for me. that I come back as guilty, or that you shoot me. Is that the extent of how you view my play so far - that I am so anti town and so loud that I could only either be mafia, or deserving of just dying?
I guess I find that really surprising, or is it just purely you dislike top posting players and want the game to be smaller?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Ernst_Brenner, Hominidae