Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Re: Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
lfischl - what do you think sweet's scumtell is? Did you actually pick up on one?
Re: Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
damo you put a placeholder vote on sweet and then never moved it. You later said that sweet was your strongest scumread. Toward the end of the day, when asked who you would shoot, you said sweet (or frog). No reasoning was given in either case. What was your reasoning behind your read on sweet?
- Frogsterking
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2022 10:31 pm
- Contact:
- Frogsterking
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2022 10:31 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
This really isn't a great postKakarroto wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 6:27 pmaren't there some maf-roles that 'eff' with PR roles? *looks* hmm, well, there is one kinda RB, and the rest are information gain roles. So ok, the potential isn't too great.BobMcBob wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 2:39 amCorrect me if I'm wrong, but the main gimmick of this setup is that nobody knows what they are. I have a suspicion that this may have been to directly combat mech clears while still having a lot of silly roles. Also I just don't like D1 mechs discussion. Mostly that.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 2:30 am
I thought you helped come up with the idea for this game. Why do you think in a game where every player is a PR that we should not try to use that to our advantage?
Still, one role which blocks and that could lead to a chain reaction so people don't get their supposed information (like, if the rb hit a role that scans a role, but that person was targeted by a role that returns what their target gets, and so on). If mafia knows what town generally plans, there are ways for them to manipulate.
We should be very cautious for any big plans that are complicated. I would prefer if everyone decides for themselves as that would also show us their thought process (at least partially), but if we decide to make a plan for all of us, then it should be one that is fool proof and doesn't let mafia much room for manipulations (well I doubt there will be none, but I haven't thought it through so maybe there is).
Re: Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
Bozo is correct. @Jamie to select someone to select up or down.
Back in 6 to 7 hours.
Back in 6 to 7 hours.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33939
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
I do not understand.damo666 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:57 amThis is doubly wrong.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:24 amI choose DOWN.
So the list is as follows:
<Snip>
------------
Okay? Is that right, and are we clear?
Firstly 4 determines the gap not the start point which achieved fuck all. So 4 means 10 targets 6 if up and 14 if down.
Secondly not up to Jamie to choose up down but nominate a person so to choose.
This gives a four person ladder and adequate protection against scum manipulation.
First - what "gap" are you talking about?
Second - Foodcoats nominated me, so I chose up or down, that was how it was stated.
You are confusing me Damo.
Potato, potato; potato.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33939
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
Well, her vote would have tied it, if the GM had said "PLEASE HOLD" 30 seconds sooner...Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:06 amThanks for the clarification. So, does this mean that the vote from babyspice shouldn't be looked on with suspicion, or it's still up there? Am I making something out of nothing?Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:10 amBecause the GM posted the "PLEASE HOLD" message about 30 seconds after the timer the bot uses decided the phase had ended.Hamilton Brian wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:08 amWait a minute:
Why did there happen to be a discrep with the bot and our final numbers?
Looking at the final vote count that Monarch posted, lfischl is on Just but the bot shows their vote on BK3K. What's up with that?
JustAGuyNamedWill (7) Diplomacy&Warfare, foodcoats, bozotheclown, Hamilton Brian, brainbomb, babyspice666, lfischl
BK3K (5) Frogsterking, BobMcBob, Kakarroto, JustAGuyNamedWill
sweetandcool (2) damo666, BunnyGo
lfischl (3) Chaqa, heartthrob24909, Jamiet99uk
Kakarroto (1) Nephthys
Diplomacy&Warfare (1) BK3K
Frogsterking (1) sweetandcool
Chaqa (1) worcej
The GM chose to accept all votes up to "PLEASE HOLD" including my vote for Lfischl, and Lfischl's vote for Will. Speaking as a regular GM, this is the correct adjudication.
Potato, potato; potato.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33939
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
I can't remember the last time Hamilton was town, he seems to have a knack of rolling scum a lot.Frogsterking wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:11 amI'm assuming that when I go to check Hamilton Brian's past D1 town games they're going to look completely different than the D1 they just played.
Potato, potato; potato.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33939
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
I did wonder about that.foodcoats wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:31 amThis is doubly wrong.
Firstly 4 determines the gap not the start point which achieved fuck all. So 4 means 10 targets 6 if up and 14 if down.
Secondly not up to Jamie to choose up down but nominate a person so to choose.
This gives a four person ladder and adequate protection against scum manipulation.
Over to Jamie to nominate, then.
[/quote]
I wanted to do Bozo's method and I thought this was a variant on that method.
What "gap" is Damo talking about? I don't get it.
Can someone explain the methodology?
It looks like several people are refusing to participate anyway so the whole thing is likely screwed up.
Potato, potato; potato.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33939
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
They are a combination of obstinate morons and/or scum.
Potato, potato; potato.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33939
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
Logic puzzles are an inherent part of the game of Mafia.
If you don't like that, may I suggest Mario Kart?
Potato, potato; potato.
- Jamiet99uk
- Posts: 33939
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
- Location: Durham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
Or a nice little cabaret act by Scum!Bungo....
Potato, potato; potato.
Re: Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
yes, there is also the tradition of posting EoN thoughts, just in case of being the nk target.
Though not all follow that tradition and people who normally do them sometimes forget to do them. I'm usually one who do them, even when I'm kinda low-target of mafia usually, since it also can be a thing to let others see where you stand and having more people do so might catch one or two mafia.
but feel free to not post any EoN thoughts/read lists
Re: Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
concern 2) should be pretty easily deterred by the random choosing effect, I thinkBunnyGo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:08 am@damo:
Still catching up. Putting kids to bed. Upshot is 3 concerns:
1) scum will have game solved much faster and know powers to target before we benefit
2) if scum have influence over choice of order they can manipulate things
So I don’t mind the plan so much but would like to add some crypto:
1) use math so nobody chooses the order
2) when you announce your results:
If you got fail, then announce
Otherwise announce both your real result and a result you cannot possibly get. So if you die, we know your real result.
This allows town to solve, while hiding from scum who is who.
Modifications likely good, but the idea of encrypting results is important.
I like the sound of putting out more than one result. Very much so.
Re: Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
wat? What did you put into your food? I think I named it in a pretty neutral way that doesn't misrepresent it, given I thought about the naming only for a couple of seconds. That post feels totally out of the world. What a very strange thing to hang on.foodcoats wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:16 amCalling them "directed PR actions" obscures the fact that you can't even properly direct your own action because you don't know what it is and you won't be able to determine what the results mean without cross-referencing. Read the setup and think about it!
Re: Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
well, that's great to hear. I picked you two since I think you two are town. Even if one of you is mafia, the other one should be town. Also I think that most if not all peeps in here are on the same wavelength here, that at least one of you has to be town and mafia wont be able, or at least not easily, manipulate it, let alone get an advantage out of itJamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:21 amI prefer Kak's proposal where I get to be involved or something.
Re: Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:24 amI choose DOWN.
So the list is as follows:
4 bozotheclown
targets
5 Brainbomb
targets
6 BunnyGo
targets
7 Chaqa
targets
8 Damo666
targets
9 Diplomacy&Warfare
targets
10 foodcoats
targets
11 Frogsterking
targets
12 Hamilton Brian
targets
13 heartthrob24909
targets
14 Jamiet99uk
targets
15 Kakarroto
targets
16 lfischl
targets
17 Nephthys
targets
18 sweetandcool
targets
19 Worcej
targets
1 babyspice666
targets
2 BK3K
targets
3 BobMcBob
targets
4 Bozotheclown
------------
Okay? Is that right, and are we clear?
nah, I'm pretty sure you did a wrong. You just posted the normal thing bozo suggested, just with a different beginning, but it doesn't change the outcome. Its supposed to count four down, right? As a target. So if we take the list (and remove poor will from there) it looks like this:
babyspice666
BK3K
BobMcBob
bozotheclown
Brainbomb
BunnyGo
Chaqa
Damo666
Diplomacy&Warfare
foodcoats
Frogsterking
Hamilton Brian
heartthrob24909
Jamiet99uk
Kakarroto
lfischl
Nephthys
sweetandcool
Worcej
starting at the top, babyspice would target brainbomb; BK3K targets Bunny; jumping down, you would target sweet and I worcej. For those below, they count down and continue counting down from the top after exceeding the limit, so lfischl would target babyspice, Nephthys would target BK3K and so on
should look like this:
babyspice666 → brainbomb
BK3K → BunnyGo
BobMcBob → Chaqa
bozotheclown → damo666
Brainbomb → Diplomacy&Warfare
BunnyGo → foodcoats
Chaqa → Frogsterking
Damo666 → Hamilton Brian
Diplomacy&Warfare → heartthrob24909
foodcoats → Jamiet99uk
Frogsterking → Kakarroto
Hamilton Brian → lfischl
heartthrob24909 → Nephthys
Jamiet99uk → sweetandcool
Kakarroto → worcej
lfischl → babyspice666
Nephthys → BK3K
sweetandcool → BobMcBob
Worcej → bozotheclown
that is, if we even going to follow that plan
Re: Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
not wrong with information gain about how the wagons go and stuff, BUT you overlook one thing: not going for lurkers/low participants hurts town, especially in the long run. If they don't send information, then we can't read them properly, right? They just hang back and have them there, sitting grinning (at least some of them) and we don't know much about them and have used up most or all of our misvotes. Now what?!?Nephthys wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:38 amInherently D1 is a semi-blind shot. There is often little of objectively analyse, yes we hit town more than mafia. However we can then analyse the wagons etc with our first piece of objective evidence. In a role madness where we never really know our own actions, I would argue that we need all the objective information we can get. Another reason why I find anyone that wants to kill a lurker today inherently scummy
Another thing, if we de-incentivize people playing that way by going for lurkers/low participants early, it's becoming a less viable strategy for mafia. It might be incredible long term, but game after game after game, lurking/low posting mafia stop using this strategy, forced to come up sending information or get weeded out.
This way, we get rid of weak town and easily hidden mafia. We get MORE information over the game and the potential for future games increases. If we pile on this, game after game, we get added interest, maybe even a game with no lurker/low participant. How about that? Wouldn't that sound fun?
(ok maybe not for the people who already complain about reading a few pages, but still, it is the opposite of not wanting to gain information)
Also, it's not we don't get no information by going for lurkers; we still get the vote progression and reasoning from people that can be connected to the flip.
Sure, it might be a little less RIGHT NOW ON D1, but that also keeps high poster in the game which increases information for the next phase and for town that is a big positive.
You might not like it, and honestly, I don't love it either, but weeding out weak or low intensity players on D1 isn't bad for town and overall not a bad strategy.
Re: Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
ohh, I see. So depending on the person Jamie chooses, the target list could also be this (if chosen up):damo666 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:57 amThis is doubly wrong.Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:24 amI choose DOWN.
So the list is as follows:
4 bozotheclown
targets
5 Brainbomb
targets
6 BunnyGo
targets
7 Chaqa
targets
8 Damo666
targets
9 Diplomacy&Warfare
targets
10 foodcoats
targets
11 Frogsterking
targets
12 Hamilton Brian
targets
13 heartthrob24909
targets
14 Jamiet99uk
targets
15 Kakarroto
targets
16 lfischl
targets
17 Nephthys
targets
18 sweetandcool
targets
19 Worcej
targets
1 babyspice666
targets
2 BK3K
targets
3 BobMcBob
targets
4 Bozotheclown
------------
Okay? Is that right, and are we clear?
Firstly 4 determines the gap not the start point which achieved fuck all. So 4 means 10 targets 6 if up and 14 if down.
Secondly not up to Jamie to choose up down but nominate a person so to choose.
This gives a four person ladder and adequate protection against scum manipulation.
babyspice666 → lfischl
BK3K → Nephthys
BobMcBob → sweetandcool
bozotheclown → worcej
Brainbomb → babyspice666
BunnyGo → BK3K
Chaqa → BobMcBob
Damo666 → bozotheclown
Diplomacy&Warfare → brainbomb
foodcoats → BunnyGo
Frogsterking → Chaqa
Hamilton Brian → damo666
heartthrob24909 → Diplomacy&Warfare
Jamiet99uk → foodcoats
Kakarroto → Frogsterking
lfischl → Hamilton Brian
Nephthys → heartthrob24909
sweetandcool → Jamiet99uk
Worcej → Kakarroto
if I'm not wrong, that is?
Re: Mafia 85: Return from Lockdown
if you read this and haven't read the rest of the game, I dare you to reread the whole game and get opinionated!BK3K wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:43 amBold of you to assume I have a guess on anyone’s role. I’ve hardly read half the postsbrainbomb wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:08 amFrom the Maf Qt
BK3k: Okay I think brain might be the cop, and worcej is probably the doctor
Jamie: No. Everyone has no idea what their role is. It is very specific.
Bk3k: But they might be those roles
Jamie: Utter rubbish. absolute poppycock. Complete bullshit.
Damo: Jamie keep fighting with brain and find something to get under his skin about.
Jamie: Utter rubbish, brainbomb isnt real. He is just an AI generated by elon musk.
Bk3k: Who should we kill
Jamie: Utter rubbish. the idea that we should kill someone is absolute bullshit and complete poppycock
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: JustAGuyNamedWill, SaintSimmer, Spartaculous